Posted on 01/13/2002 4:38:46 AM PST by The Wizard
A Media, TV Press, et al that spent all it's time defending the Clinton lies, and giving a lot of space and time to the Clinton lacky's, has just about let it's glee at the potential to attack an honest President, and help make the democrats look less crooked by implying the old stand by:"they all do it" walk themselves into a fatal trap.
Being led by the notorious Waxman, defender of any corrrupt democrat, the criminal liberal media is allowing itself to be used to make a case that isn't there.
They fell so flat in the beginning, because the Bush Administration WASN'T corrupt like the last bunch of bought and paid for crooks, that they have already started to retreat into the claims that BECAUSE the Bush Administration DIDN'T do anything wrong there is a problem
The media whores are about to spend their most important chip, credibility, to support the liars and cheats in congress and the democrat party, clinton's old guard, to help sell a story that doesn't exist, putting them even more visibly in bed with the American terrorists that have attacked the country since the election of Smilin' Bill "Capone"
Some of the smarter people, like Wolf Blitzer have already seen how they have been set up and are starting to retreat.....
Whoraldo even got out of the country, (you think he just decided to leave???)
We'll soon see who are real reporters and who are on the payroll, won't we....
NOW *you* are falling a bit of subterfuge sown by a disingenuous poster, a probable democRat, whose only posts, save for one tha I saw, was to sow doubt on GWB's involvement.
I think it preceeds Nov. '63 - it stems from when those in the press first learned that they could affect the King's or the people's opinion, as required and when required to influence a situation to one of *their* (the press's) liking or desire.
You will note that "The G man" (AKA DaGman) won't respond.
His mission here is to agitate WITHOUT becoming too visible.
See how *effective* he's been in stirring something up?
At least Tuco-bad will enter into interactive, 2-way give and take debate!
What has he done? Deprived some bank of the use of its money (most likely insured) for a period of time. How many people were actually hurt?
When corporations and individuals conspire to defraud tens of thousands of investors of what may be part or all of their retirement savings they usually walk away with a slap on the wrist and a full and public accounting of the money involved never takes place.
In my opinion these criminals are the worst of any you can name. If convicted of these huge swindles they should be publicly hanged or shot in the back of the head. If the government won't step up and do it a group of the swindled investors should hire it done. What court in the land could find 12 people who would be willing to convict them?
It seems ABC didn't read the Washington Post today.....
This first occured during the Crimean War with the reporting of Willam Howard Russell and Thomas Chenery for The Times about the horrible condition of the British war wounded.
I just went to the CNN web site and copied the transcript. It go into my files, to be resurrected when that part of the story falls on its face.
Check it out at: Transcript of Reliable Sources
BTW, one of the liberals was Phil Bronstein of the SF Chronicle. Isn't that Mr. Sharon Stone?
On the evidence to date, the Bush Administration would seem to have admirably rebuffed pleas for favors from its most generous business supporter.
No,he did not! I listened to every word and he did a very credible job. Was honest and straightforward.
Your chicken little scenario is not going anywhere as the big media guns start pulling back from this story.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.