Posted on 05/29/2025 8:03:01 AM PDT by thegagline
A U.S. federal judge has inflicted another blow to the Trump administration’s efforts to end a multiple Biden-era parole program for hundreds of thousands of migrants*** U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani of Massachusetts on Wednesday ordered the Trump administration to resume processing applications from those migrants who are seeking work permits or renewing their status.
Talwani, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, rejected the Trump administration's claim that suspending the parole programs was within its broad discretion to direct immigration policy.
Federal law still requires agencies under the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to follow a lengthy process for granting or denying parole ***
Talwani also certified a nationwide class, temporarily protecting all individuals in several humanitarian parole programs while the case proceeds.
"This court emphasizes, as it did in its prior order, that it is not in the public interest to manufacture a circumstance in which hundreds of thousands of individuals will, over the course of several months, become unlawfully present in the country, such that these individuals cannot legally work in their communities or provide for themselves and their families," the judge wrote.
*** The migrants were granted a two-year "parole" to live in the country under programs established by former President Joe Biden. The programs let migrants and their immediate family members fly to the United States as long as they had sponsors in America. Then, they would be placed on parole for two years.
However, the Trump administration has been trying to end all parole programs as part of its immigration crackdown and has already asked the Supreme Court to weigh in on the matter. President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Jan. 20 directing the government to end "all categorical parole programs" set up during the Biden administration.
***
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Furthermore, when Biden and Obama imposed tariffs, how many judges struck them down? None.
When Obama and Biden (rarely) enforced our immigration laws, how many judges issued injunctions? None.
How many people voted for these tyrannical judges? None.
Jefferson once wrote to Madison:
“Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem. [I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery] Even this evil is productive of good. It prevents the degeneracy of government, and nourishes a general attention to the public affairs. I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical.” - Jefferson to Madison, January 30, 1787
Ignore and proceed.
No worries. Trump will win most of these injunctions. Of course this will happen around jan 19 2029.
I’m looking ahead to see who may be running in 2028
“that it is not in the public interest “
Sorry Lawfare Judges, that’s not a question for you to answer.
Indira Talwani Is a weird name
....and the Supreme Court says......{crickets}
“Federal law still requires agencies under the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to follow a lengthy process for granting or denying parole *** “
The Biden administration did no “lengthy process” in granting the paroles, and on appeal that argument will void them.
Where are the Republicans in Congress???????????????????
DO NOTHING HACKS who only want our votes every 2 years!!
GET OFF UR collective rear ends AND DO SOMETHING!!!!!!
“...that it is not in the public interest... “
Whatever is or isn’t “in the public interest” is none of your damn business..............
Looks like the Liberal courts are to block Trump until the Liberals can retake the House and Senate in two years. We now
live in the age of Judges. They are the new masters of the nation. Goal: keep the Democrat Gravy Train rolling!
He'll win a lot of them, and it will happen a lot faster than that. Of course, he'll lose some too, because sometimes he's fighting not just Biden EO's, but actual laws passed by Congress.
https://realrawnews.com/2025/05/antony-blinken-military-tribunal-part-4/
That one will not last, as it was create by EO. Thus, it can be removed with an EO. This is what needs to be prohibited, and anyone ruling like this should face immediate impeachment.
Uh, not in India where she is really from.
And for those who jump in and say “but she wuz born here!” my answer is so what. Her loyalty, her genetics, her attitudes are all to the people of “India”, whatever that is, and secondarily, to anyone who’s foreign of any strip...except White European.
The idiot just advanced the theory that a Presidential EO can never be revoked...unless Don Trump issued it. And she did so because she simply has the political bent towards the aliens who were allowed to bypass all the immigration laws.
We are no longer a federal republic, we are an autocratic tyranny run by judicial fiat.
Add this one to the list. They just blocked the tariffs and closing the Dept of ED. Trump’s unwillingness to defy even the most outrages ruling has left him with a crippled Presidency. He even grounded a plane on the other side of the world endangering ICE agents because of a rat judge.
When in the course of human events
If the SC won’t do their job, Trump needs to ignore all lower courts. They are created by congress, are not co-equal with the executive. WTF did we have an election for? WTF is Blondi doing?
Are you a very young person?
If not, what are your life experiences that would lead you to look to Congressional Republicans to do anything at all about this problem?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.