Posted on 09/26/2024 12:31:09 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
This is the third week in a row that former President Trump has held a two-point national lead over sitting Vice President Kamala Harris in the Rasmussen Reports weekly poll.
Rasmussen surveyed 1,820 likely voters on September 19 and 22-25 and found 48 percent support for Trump and 46 percent support for Harris.
“These findings are nearly unchanged since last week, when Trump held a 49% to 47% lead over Harris, which was the same as the survey published September 12,” writes the pollster.
The internals show — and this is a large sample size — that Trump leads Harris with Hispanics, 49 to 42 percent. The former president is also overperforming with black voters, 28 to 66 percent. That should be closer to 15 to 85 percent.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
One would think the bureaucracy of government would conduct itself much differently with half the public that is against their expensive nonsense machinery. If they love mob rule raw democracy so much??????.......
This is nuts. Trump should be blowing out Harris like Reagan was blowiny out Mondale at this point in the game
The polls say that Trump will win, but the bettors are voting for Rat fraud to prevail again.
This isn’t the same country that it was in Reagan’s time.
If that is a Democrat over sampled poll, this is great news. Trump/Vance is kicking the JV team to the curb.
The only lede that counts is the lede in the Electoral College.
Amen.
“The polls say that Trump will win, but the bettors are voting for Rat fraud to prevail again.”
The bettors are starting to get close again. Polymarket only has the commie up 1.
Ignore the polls...really. Gallop does a survey that says party ID is +3 Republican and I don’t think even on of these polls is working with that assumption. Every poll is making some big assumptions. Just worry about getting out the vote and Trump could pill it off.
That was at least 2 brainwashed generations ago.
That’s many, many millions of voters.
Also, since CA and NY suck....dems have flooded R states and turned them blue or competitive.
they are like roaches.
I was 12 when The Great One won.
It was a great time to be a teenager under Him.
Not enough. He needs to be +7 to make the massive fraud untenable.
The polls were tight in both 1980 and 1984. It wasn’t until the last week or so the Gipper started pulling away. That was before we had early voting, so the dynamics aren’t the same, obviously.
“Not enough. He needs to be +7 to make the massive fraud untenable.”
Whatever🙄.
https://earlyvoteaction.com/
https://truethevote.org/donate
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/?utm_soure=website
https://www.gop.com/
This is nuts. Trump should be blowing out Harris like Reagan was blowiny out Mondale at this point in the game
*******************
Really?
So Trump should be winning
California
New York
New Jersey
Massachusetts
Washington
Illinois
Connecticut
Maryland
Rhode Island
New Mexico
Hawaii
Oregon
Vermont
Maine
Etc
That GD Trump can’t do anything right and is alway screwing up.(sarcasm)
Whatever you’re drinking, I want some.
Bingo! Can’t believe this is such a tight race. The woman is floundering in her interviews etc the only thing Trump messed up was to give her credence at the debate. He should’ve creamed her but instead he tried to play the nice guy and it came back to bite him in the ass. Infuriating that the cackling hyena is this close. You would think that by now the honeymoon would’ve been over and she would be taking a nose dive down the cliff. Seems like Trump can’t shake her off his back. Ugh!
Oh, I’m sure he’s more like 42 points.
But the polling has to tell us that it’s close. Sadam made that mistake.
I’ve seen 2 Harris signs and one Harris sticker on a car. I’ve seen over a thousand cats in a parade flying expensive Trump flags as they circled the entire town.
Trump is so far ahead that’s ridiculous.. and they’ll never even admit it.
If it was baseball they would have forfeit.
Not true. We'll have to work hard. And maybe a little bit of luck, this election will be like 2016.
While I acknowledge that times are different, I’ll add into the mix that when Reagan was running against Mondale, the press back then were talking about the race being very close and competitive. The same was said with Reagan vs. Carter as well. I was a teenager during that time and I remember turning to my father and saying that based on the polls from two different presidential cycles it seemed that if one subtracted two points from the democrat and added four or five to the republican that gave you a more accurate sense of what is really going on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.