SCOTUS Opinions [Thursday, June 20, 2024]

scotusblog ^ | 6/20/24 | staff

[CFW]

The Supreme Court will be releasing Opinions for the October 2023 this morning at 10:00. Attorneys at Scotusblog will be in the press room and will liveblog the opinions as they are released here

You can find a list of the cases for this term here:

October 2023 term

There are 23 cases remaining to have decisions released between now and the end of the month (I can recall one time when the term continued into the first week of July but that's not the norm).

For those keeping score, thus far Roberts has written 2 opinions; Thomas 6, Alito, 4, Kagan 4, Gorsuch 2, Kavanaugh 4, Sotomayor, 7, Barrett 3, and Jackson 4. (Two cases were per curiam)

Cases of interest that remain undecided are the Trump immunity case, the Fischer case (relating to Jan 6 and Trump), and the two cases relating to the Chevron deference issues, Loper Bright and Relentless.

There is also a 2nd Amendment case, Rahimi, regarding possession of a firearm by persons subject to domestic-violence restraining orders. And a taxation case, Moore v. U.S. regarding whether the 16th Amendment authorizes Congress to tax unrealized sums without apportionment among the states.

And of course, there are the First Amendment case. First is NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton, then Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, and then Missouri v. Murthy Issue: Whether respondents have Article III standing; (2) whether the government’s challenged conduct transformed private social media companies’ content-moderation decisions into state action and violated respondents’ First Amendment rights; and (3) whether the terms and breadth of the preliminary injunction are proper.

[spacejunkie2001]

amen and amen! It DOES work and we all constantly need to be reminded. Remember the disciples were told over and over by Jesus what was going to happen to Him and when it happened, they didn’t remember.

The world wants to weigh us down but it’s incumbent upon us to not let it.

[LS]

No off shore money for people shielding accounts from taxes. Good. This will have the effect of forcing a repatriation of US money abroad.

[LS]

Zen Master, my court guru, says Trump wins the immunity vote 6-3 or possibly 7-2, but says the total leftoids on the court won’t go for it.

[Jane Long]

Amen!

[Jane Long]

Good. This will have the effect of forcing a repatriation of US money abroad.

---

👍🏼

[spacejunkie2001]

both of those vote counts are the perfect score! LOL I’ll take it.

[pollywog]

THANK you my FRiend!!

[OneVike]

People still have to realize that FDR committed a pretty serious infraction with interning huge numbers of American Nisei during WWII. IMO, the same thing goes with Johnson and Gulf of Tonkin...

Yea if the court says there is no immunity, then we can bring both Biden and Obama up on charges also, and as for FDR and Johnson we can do what the Pope did to Wycliffe.

Wycliff died in prison in 1384, but by decree of the Council of Constance, the Catholics had his remains dug up 44 years later in 1528, and burned him to ashes in 1528. This was accomplished under the command of Pope Martin V.

So you see, there is precedence for such a thing.

[OneVike]

Interesting, someplace I missed that.

Thanks

[Lazamataz]

I mostly agree based upon the same reasoning. But they may give a narrow pathway for the left to go against Trump (and Trump only).

If they do -- and I don't think they will -- that would be a Bill of Attainder.

Of course, if they did, who would we go to? The Supreme Court?

[going hot]

At the bottom of the text will be a simple one line sentance, “except trump”

[aMorePerfectUnion]

Thanks for posting these threads!

[cdnerds]

No they havent. Someone on twitter was lying.

[11th_VA]

Chuck Schumer can easily get over THAT fence … just saying

[Shady]

That does not let the Presidential Potato off the hook. The majority of his crimes occurred when he was Vice Mullah.

[OneVike]

Not when it is all about politics I wouldn’t

[Jeff Chandler]

Thus I am confident that the ruling will be 9-0 in favor of immunity

The leftists on the court, even if they believe the law confers immunity, will vote against President Trump -- against immunity. Politics trump all.

They can always vote the opposite next time to protect their own.

[BigEdLB]

7-2. “Wise Latina”, and “Don’t know what a woman is” will vote no. Kagan will probably see future effect on future Donk Preses

[Verginius Rufus]

"1528" should be "1428."

According to his biography on Wikipedia, Wycliff suffered a stroke while saying Mass in a parish church on Dec. 28, 1384, and died on Dec. 31, 1384...so he did not die in prison.

[kiryandil]

I mostly agree based upon the same reasoning. But they may give a narrow pathway for the left to go against Trump (and Trump only).

Donald "Immanuel Goldstein" Trump.

It's OK if we use bills of attainder and ex post facto laws against HIM.