Posted on 05/29/2024 8:23:32 AM PDT by janetjanet998
Merchan just delivered the coup de grace instruction. He said that there is no need to agree on what occurred. They can disagree on what the crime was among the three choices. Thus, this means that they could split 4-4-4 and he will still treat them as unanimous
So a dead misdemeanor for falsifying business records was zapped back into life by alleging that under NY election law 17-152 it was done to influence the election by the unlawful means of falsification of business records. It is so circular as to produce vertigo. So the jury finds some documents were falsified to use the unlawful means of falsifying other documents. That is only one of three possible crimes and the jury does not have to agree on which was the basis for their conviction.
Illegal
Writing is on the NY wall.
The legal experts did no favors by pretending this Judge and NY Court had any interest whatsoever in Justice.
It should’ve been called out from the beginning.
Daughter’s total has to be $120 Million by now.
Daddy is advising her to hide the total.
There is no legal or illegal in America any longer. There is simply the exercise of power.
Truth
How quickly can this be overturned on appeal
If some jurors believe that Trump falsified business documents solely to cover up a tax crime, while others believe that he falsified business documents solely to cover up an election crime, the jury can still convict Trump on the felony-level falsifying-documents charges, despite disagreeing on the predicate crimes
—
But without the “other crime” the case would only be as misdemeanor with statue of limitations running out in 2019 and we wouldn’t even be here
So how can he be found guilty of a falsifying records if any of the other crimes are not each unanimous?
Don’t you have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a particular felony crime occurred?
Hawaii said it is no longer bound by US law, but by tribal tradition. What was done?
Why would NY be any different?
Really?
I want you to think long and hard about that.
The GOP has a problem. Do you keep Trump or not?
Trump or nothing. All of you squishes GTH. All of you.
Here’s What Could Happen If Trump Is Found Guilty in the Stormy Daniels Case
PJ Media ^ | 05/29/2024 | Matt Vespa:
According to conservative radio host Mark Levin, in the event of a guilty verdict, Trump could seek a direct appeal to the Supreme Court.
“I asked my friend of nearly 45-years [sic], Arthur Fergenson, who served as a law clerk to the late chief justice, Warren Burger, and one of the smartest lawyers I know, if he represented President Trump how he might seek a direct appeal to the Supreme Court if necessary,” Levin wrote in a post on X/Twitter.
Levin posted Fergenson’s reply.
The US Supreme Court can act by its statutory writs of certiorari to take a case from a lower appellate court, and the Court also has a host of other processes, often called common law writs. I became acquainted with these common law writs (actually authorized as a general matter by the Judiciary Act of 1789: law.justia.com/constitution/u… ), when IBM sought review of a discovery order by a vindictive federal judge when I was clerking for Chief Justice Warren Burger. A total of six petitions were filed; all were denied, and rarely are any common law writs ever issued by the Supreme Court, but there are, nonetheless, multiple ways to offer the Supreme Court an opportunity to forthwith review.
BREAKING: The Biden-Harris team is holding a press conference outside the courthouse where Trump’s trial is taking place
They’re openly taunting him—almost boasting about the fact that this case was ordered by them!
Even if DJT were "convicted" of only one count, Biden is ready to call a white house presser to say we have to respect the verdict, notwithstanding the fact that Merchan manipulated and deceived the jury.
Merchan doesn’t care. His objective is to help Biden get elected at any cost.
In other words, Merchan, Bragg and Biden are conspiring to commit a federal election crime.
What I want, and you want, has no bearing on what the people picking the candidates want.
That is my point.
I am not a Trump fan. That is true. However he is the best candidate we got at this point.
But the intel boys and girls really, really, hate Trump. They will remove him from the board. This trial was done with that in mind, and judging by the polls it failed. There are a few other things to try, but it wouldn’t be the first time an unacceptable candidate was removed by the establishment.
Only two questions remain. What will be the way they do it? What will be the response?
The latter has to be the thing keeping a lot of people up at night.
Yes. Why is that a question for you?
From what I read, the same four can vote to convict on all three and that’s good enough.
It appears so.
Deep State is running the show.
You are not convincing, Nostradamus. If you had posted, "I believe..." that would have been better.
IOW, say six of them say he's guilty of counts 2, 5 and 21, and four say he's guilty of 3, 10 and 15 and two say he's guilty of 6, 18 and 34. Then by the judge's instruction he's guilty of all................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.