Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan scolds Trump attorney
Washington Post via MSN ^ | May 9 | Patty Nieberg

Posted on 05/10/2024 12:10:00 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?

NEW YORK — New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan blamed Donald Trump’s attorney Susan Necheles in court Thursday for not sufficiently objecting in real time to adult-film actress Stormy Daniels’s detailed testimony this week — and again said Daniels’s testimony does not warrant a mistrial.

In the lead-up to his ruling against a mistrial, Merchan observed that there were “many times when Ms. Necheles could have objected but didn’t.” The judge acknowledged that he wished New York prosecutors hadn’t asked Daniels certain questions. But in a biting review of Necheles’s performance as Trump’s defense lawyer, Merchan cited one incident as a key example: Daniels’s allegation Tuesday that Trump did not use a condom when they had sex. Trump and his team have previously denied he had sex with Daniels. “Why on earth she wouldn’t object to the mention of a condom, I don’t understand,” Merchan said.

During her testimony Tuesday, Daniels described her alleged 2006 sexual encounter with Trump in a way that could be viewed as unwanted, though she did not say she was assaulted. She told prosecutors that she was concerned Trump did not use a condom but that she never expressed that to him. Trump’s lawyers argued Thursday that Daniels’s testimony amounted to a “dog whistle for rape.” In ruling against the defense’s motion for a mistrial, Merchan said that prosecutors had the right to “rehabilitate” Daniels’s credibility to the jury, given that Trump’s team denies a sexual encounter ever took place. He also criticized the cross-examination for going into “ad nauseam” details about Daniels’s testimony.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: invasion; merchan; nytrumptrial; stormydanials; trump; trumptrial
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: SERE_DOC

Here is the issue from my point of view. Trump is meticulous. Everything is scheduled, checked, rechecked and rechecked again. That’s what a Project Manager does and Trump is one of the best Project Managers on the planet. He would have schedules of everything he has ever done with notes to go along with it.

So my question is, why hasn’t his schedule from the time the Kielbasa Queen made the accusation been brought up in court? Oh wait, she already said she never had sex with Trump. I believe that is documented, so why is this trial even happening? /We know the answer.


21 posted on 05/10/2024 3:40:23 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Give the Anti-Israel Protesters a one way ticket to fight with Hamas. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Are Trumps attorneys allowed to bring up the documents that “Stormy Daniels” signed saying she never had sex with Trump?


22 posted on 05/10/2024 3:53:57 AM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869
I didn’t want to hear about it, or assume that I was paid prostitute, which I wasn’t

Oh please. The only difference between prostitute and porn actress is a camera.

23 posted on 05/10/2024 4:05:18 AM PDT by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
She should have never been called. She considers it free advertising. She's a whore...through and through. Want to know where I might get that impression....see the Jimmy Kimmel show where she describes her fictitious story.
24 posted on 05/10/2024 4:13:41 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Trump’s only hope at this point is a hung jury.


25 posted on 05/10/2024 4:15:12 AM PDT by phil00071
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

there are over a dozen reasons this could be thrown out on appeal


26 posted on 05/10/2024 4:17:58 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

not a single thing she said had anything to do with how an expense was categorized.


27 posted on 05/10/2024 4:20:02 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Of course, there’s a lot missing from this article. Such as Trump lawyers put in place a standing objection to Daniels testimony and every question she was asked by the prosecutor. This is done in some jury trials because it keeps the lawyer from having to object to every question and be hated by the jury for doing it.


28 posted on 05/10/2024 4:30:05 AM PDT by Captain Jack Aubrey (There's not a moment to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

The defense objected both to Daniels testimony generally, and to inappropriate paths the questioning and answers would go down (which they did), and Merchan over-ruled their objections and even denied doing so.


29 posted on 05/10/2024 4:39:29 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Salacious testimony has tainted the jury.
Of course it was not defenses fault. She just let the judge relly hang himself. And he did.

The MAGA spin meme upside?

Re: Stormy Daniels uncharacteruistic black out alleged during supposed sex with Trump.

PDJTs plenipotentiary instrument is so YUGE that the poor hooker and porn star blacked out from trying to accomodate Mr. Trump as he then was.

Not only is PDJT a wonderful MAGA president for America, BUT HE IS HUNG LIKE A HORSE!

America should rejoice...Pooty, Lil Kim, Xi and the Iranian Mullahs must now surely realized that they are completely over matched! All of their wimmin are belong to US !


30 posted on 05/10/2024 4:41:34 AM PDT by Candor7 (Ask not for whom the Trump Trolls,He trolls for thee!),<img src="" width=500</img><a href="">tag</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway

Are Trumps attorneys allowed to bring up the documents that “Stormy Daniels” signed saying she never had sex with Trump?


Yes, part of the prosecutions questioning was over why she has recanted, for which she gave several reasons.


31 posted on 05/10/2024 4:43:43 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Juan Merchan should be impeached, convicted, and encouraged to leave the United States.


32 posted on 05/10/2024 4:46:10 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skr
If he’s here legally, he’s not a “wet-back”,>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Yeah, he is a wetback because he is now acting illegally, violating his duty of citizenship to uphold and defend the Constitution , violating TRumps civil rights by acting under color of law.IN fact Juan Merchan is detroying the administration of Constitutional justice by his unlawful judicial administration of this bogus case.Its a kangaroo court.

WETBACK!


33 posted on 05/10/2024 4:48:12 AM PDT by Candor7 (Ask not for whom the Trump Trolls,He trolls for thee!),<img src="" width=500</img><a href="">tag</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

The judge knows this will be overturned but trump will be a convicted felon on the campaign trail


34 posted on 05/10/2024 4:51:16 AM PDT by SPRINK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
That is mistrial in the making.

EXACTLY! The judge allowed this witness, knowing the only reason she was there was to taint and bias the jury against Trump. This is a business records case, not a sexual assault (although that is also what this whore alluded to in her testimony).

The judge then scolds Trump's lawyers for not sufficiently objecting to testimony that he, THE JUDGE, allowed in HIS courtroom!! REALLY??!??

Her very presence and testimony would have been enough to cause a mistrial in any other business records case - PERIOD!
35 posted on 05/10/2024 5:10:29 AM PDT by ExTxMarine (Finish the Wall and Deport them All!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SPRINK

Merchan knows this will be overturned on appeal. He doesn’t care. he’ll be a hero to the left, as will every last one of the jurors who promised “impartiality” when they were ready to pronounce him guilty before they even sat down. Appeals take time, one thing Trump is running out of before the election.


36 posted on 05/10/2024 5:11:05 AM PDT by pawpawrick (I had a life once but my job ate it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Sicon

Most notable absence from the so-called ‘testimony’ session was failure of DJT’s atty to question whether she was lying now...or when she previously flat out denied that anything she said in court ever happened.

At least not that I’ve seen...


37 posted on 05/10/2024 5:12:41 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: pawpawrick

As a legal system weaponizer, Merchan has forfeited his rights to life, liberty and happiness


38 posted on 05/10/2024 5:14:04 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. +12) Hamascide is required in totality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Judge Merchan is either an incompetent buffoon...

...or culpable (as he proves over...and over...and over...)...


39 posted on 05/10/2024 5:17:24 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

Merchan is guilty


40 posted on 05/10/2024 5:18:25 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. +12) Hamascide is required in totality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson