Posted on 01/25/2024 12:22:34 PM PST by ChicagoConservative27
The dress that E. Jean Carroll — the woman who has sued former President Donald Trump for defamation for denying her claims that he sexually assaulted her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the early 1990’s — claims she wore during the alleged attack did not exist at the time, Trump’s lawyer pointed out.
Carroll’s second defamation trial against Trump is underway. Notably, Trump is not facing criminal charges in these cases. Carroll first went public with her story in 2019, posing for a cover of New York Magazine in the Donna Karan blazer dress that she claims she was assaulted in. However, it turns out the dress was not even available the original year that she claimed the attack happened.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
The odd of this being a true accusation are the same as me winning the 3 billion powerball lottery and getting hit by lightening in Biden’s basement.
If the dress don’t exist you must desist.
“The odd of this being a true accusation are the same as me winning the 3 billion powerball lottery and getting hit by lightening in Biden’s basement.....” while riding a bicycle on top of a horse
Did she also take a shower after she got a perm? (Legally Blond denouement)
She made the entire thing up with the help of lard ass George Conway and the prick who went to Epstein island Hoffman..the entire thing was baloney from the start
Oops. That’s why I quit lying when I was young…. too hard to keep your story straight. Telling the truth is so much easier.
( now someone is going to point out it’s a lie to say I quit lying..)
She can’t seem to consistently remember the date this ‘horrific’ thing happened to her. I find it hard to believe she remembers the dress.
I have never believed this story, not for a second. I have met plenty of Billionaires in my line of work and one thing I do know is that, most women will drop their pants on hello for them.
That’s a fun movie, especially the part with the gay boyfriend.
Any judge hearing this farce should be removed and disbarred.
Sort of like the font on the fake records of GWB’s service in the Alabama National Guard didn’t exist at the time of typing- remember that one??
“She is a lying sack of you know what.”
Either that or she’s a time traveler.
Too bad this wasn’t determined before the first verdict.
While I agree, wasn’t DJT found guilty already? Isn’t this a second defamation trial for later comments?
What I am wondering is does this info derail the first verdict and be a cause for the second trial to be tossed?
That would be tremendous news indeed...
“Sort of like the font on the fake records of GWB’s service in the Alabama National Guard didn’t exist at the time of typing- remember that one??”
Yes, had forgotten that one! Hysterical.
I’ll take Linda Tripp’s expert testimony on this matter.
NO...he was NOT found “guilty” of rape; he was declared INNOCENT of that.
This stuff would be funny if it weren’t tragic ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.