Posted on 01/13/2024 1:30:19 PM PST by Uncle Miltie
The Al-Aqsa Mosque compound in the Old City of Jerusalem sits atop the site of the Second Temple, the central place for Jewish worship before its destruction during the Roman siege of Jerusalem in 70 C.E.
One wonders if any of the people braying about the alleged “settler colonialism” of Israel ever wonder how Al-Aqsa got there.
Did the Jews voluntarily erect a version of it in an eighth-century homage to multiculturalism? If not, how did the Muslims who built it come to be in Jerusalem in the first place?
These are rhetorical questions, of course. The caliphate besieged Jerusalem and took it from the Byzantines in the early seventh century.
Since the “decolonization” agenda is meant only to target Western nations and peoples, you rarely hear of the conquests and empire-building of the non-Western world, which is conveniently forgotten behind a narrative of pervasive victimization.
All of human history is a story of never-ending layers of conquest and defeat and of migration and exile. If it were to be undone, we’d need to extirpate almost all peoples everywhere, including those who are currently portrayed as the hopelessly oppressed.
The earliest phase of the seventh-century Arab expansion was truly explosive, and then it continued at a slower but still impressive clip.
Indeed, it is one of the most sweeping acts of conquest and successful exercises in colonialism in world history. This wasn’t the Mongols driving all before them and then receding to leave little in their trace, or the Normans getting absorbed into the England they conquered. No, the Arabs followed up their military conquest with a cultural imperialism still felt today.
The Arabs would gobble up Syria, Palestine, Egypt, and Mesopotamia. They chipped away at the Byzantine Empire and launched a no-kidding effort to conquer it wholesale that fell short after two epic sieges of Constantinople. They basically took all of the Persian empire. Eventually, they assembled an empire with the greatest territorial extent since the Romans, encompassing 80 percent of the population of the Middle East and North Africa and reaching to the south of France.
Dan Jones writes in his history of the Middle Ages, Powers and Thrones, “Syria was one of the first major triumphs of a new power that was about to sweep across the world, branching out to the borders of China and the Atlantic seaboard of Europe, establishing an Islamic state that covered more than twelve million square kilometers.”
Its armies “appeared everywhere from central Asia, through the Middle East and north Africa, throughout the Visigothic Iberian Peninsula, and even into southern France.” Everywhere they conquered, they put in place “Islamic governments and introduced new ways of living, trading, learning, thinking, building, and praying.”
And of speaking and writing. The caliph Abd al-Malik imposed Arabic as the official language of the empire, an act of the highest cultural significance, since Arabic and Islam were so intertwined. “Arabization,” Jones writes, “was gradually followed by conversion across the Muslim-held territories—a shift that can still be seen, felt, and heard in almost every part of the old caliphate in the twenty-first century.”
Once they had Islam foisted on them, these territories, by and large, never went back, except in the cases of Spain, Portugal, and Sicily.
In the Levant, in particular, as the archaeologist and historian Alex Joffe writes, there was an imperial project that included bringing in new people. Settlers came of their own volition or were moved there by political authorities, Joffe notes, including Egyptians in the early 19th century and Chechens, Circassians, and Turkmen at the hands of the Ottomans later in the century.
A Hamas official once said, “Half of the Palestinians are Egyptians and the other half are Saudis.”
Should all this shuffling of population be reversed? Should the land conquered by the Arabs so long ago go back to the Byzantines or Persians, or their legatees? What do Ben and Jerry think?
Obviously, the decolonizers don’t care about any of this, or the fate of the Kurds, Assyrians, and Amazighs, peoples who have suffered more recently from the Arabization of the broader region.
What they really favor is another act of Arab colonization to eliminate the Jewish people, who must succumb, finally and completely, to the long tide of Islamization and Arabization “from the river to the sea.” This isn’t a principled adherence to the rights of indigenous people or a respect for ancient homelands, but Lenin’s notorious formulation, “who whom,” in a different context.
The work begun in the seventh century, in other words, is still incomplete.
They will be, as soon as they run out of usefulness.
“Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel.” -- Leon Uris
The only people they hate more than each other, is us... But they're always fighting each other and that will always be their way.
Give Spain and Sicily back to the Arabs!
Because they just don’t have enough land 🤪
Is Leon Uris Arab?
The whole colonization trope is funny. The biggest export from “Palestine” is rocks. It’s not exactly a resource you would occupy a country over.
True dat.
Islam went from ZERO in 623 AD to 57 states (UK, France, Germany, Minnesota are having a race for #58) in 2023.
But Europeans are “colonizers”?
Today's Palestinian Arabs probably are mostly descended from the population of Palestine in the 7th century, with a mixture of Arabians, Franks (Crusaders), and other later settlers. I think DNA studies show Palestinian Arab DNA being fairly close to Jewish DNA. It's religion which is the big difference. Along with culture.
Because they aren't white europeans.
Close... He’s Jewish.
70 CE ? Is that anything like 70 AD?
No, they are white west asians. Just like the jews. And the last group of whites on the planet to favor slavery.
FIFY
CE (Communist era) and BCE (before the Communist era) is used by Communists, atheists, Christophobes and the religious Left.
Woketardism 101: only whiteys can be colonizers.
So the Crusaders were time first anti-colonialists... Good to know!
“All of human history is a story of never-ending layers of conquest and defeat and of migration and exile.”
Agreed
So nicely put, even Woke-Libtards should understand it.
It is getting hard to tell.
But people are attached to their heads and want to keep them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.