Posted on 04/14/2023 7:49:55 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
The son of FedEx shooting victim Jaswinder Singh is suing American Tactical, Inc., over the use of one of their ammunition magazines during the April 15, 2021, shooting.
Four people were killed in the incident when the gunman opened fire in the parking lot, then four more people were killed when the gunman entered the facility and shot more.
The Associated Press noted that Singh’s son is suing over American Tactical’s marketing tactics, claiming that the company has an obligation to seek controls over who can buy their products.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Make iosing party pay court costs and all legal fees. If only we were a just country.
Not in CaCaLand. The Fed law prohibits this. But, the new law out thisaway pays people to file suits. All they have to do is say that the company influenced minors to buy — and the suit will go forward. Win or lose, they get tax $$. $$ which eventually come from all 50 states.
Once Newsome becomes next Pres this will intensify.
Too bad victims of crime cannot sue the state, cities and feds, media and people like this pushing for gun control on the innocent victims.
I’m going to sue every food brand for making me overweight.
It doesn’t matter - are you familiar with dram shop law? They will hold anyone and everyone responsible that they can, including the liquor store. Whoever has the money - deep pockets.
“Strict” product liability is what’s really at stake here too. Welfare for lawyers. They’ll sue the car manufacturers for DUIs for example.
This will go nowhere.
I forget, have people sued fast-food joints for causing obesity and heart problems yet or was that just a story in The Onion?
Should sue the FedEx truck for not protecting him
Here is the thing: Loser pays legal bills. So, who is paying these high bills just to harass the manufacturer. Drag their ass into court too!
This Ping List is for all news pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from this Ping List.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
Here is the thing: Loser pays legal bills.
I have no respect for people who do this, and they DON’T get a pass because one of their relatives got killed.
They’re money-grubbing scum. Or worse.
These types of lawsuits are frivolous and should be rejected as such. It is no different than suing Kia and others for poor car security. They sell a product, not a license to use in a particular way. Instead, the lawsuits should be against the people misusing or stealing these items.
this is despicable.
they should sue every company that made the food he ate, the clothes he wore, the medicine he took, the car he drove, etc that day. it all contributed just as much
Yep, that magazine loaded itself and grabbed onto a fully automatic glock camo painted scary gun and they uber called an evil SUV to drive them around.
lol
how about suing the murderer? the city that wouldn’t keep citizens safe, the democratic party who wants to defund police etc?
the gun is innocent.
Yes, it’s death by a thousand paper cuts.
the loser pays their own legal bills, but not yours if you win. I guess you could counter sue to get your legal expenses back.
“claiming that the company has an obligation to seek controls over who can buy their products.”
I wonder how he figures that the company can ‘control’ who buys their products?
Some people are simply too dumb for words.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.