Is Klaus Schwab and his World Enslavement Forum paying Fox to to talk crap like the rest of the MSM ?
The last paragraph got cut up, bad editing on my part. This is posted to make the last sentence above make sense.
In another filing made public earlier this month, a trove of messages and emails from the most prominent stars and highest-ranking executives at Fox News showed they had privately ridiculed claims of election fraud in the 2020 election, despite the right-wing channel promoting lies about the presidential contest on its air.
The messages showed that Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, and Laura Ingraham brutally mocked lies being pushed by former President Donald Trump’s camp asserting that the election was rigged.
Was there ever a serious investigation that proved these so called lies?
False????
“False claims” CNN? You mean the claims that you bent over backward to not investigate at all? Those claims, CNN? You just labeled them all false and slammed an iron curtain down on any reporting about anything. You just wanted to go with the BS that it was the cleanest and most secure election in history and damned if you’re not still at it.
Yellow journalism is one thing, but you guys have turned into blood-red communists with your constant democrat propaganda.
“false stolen election claims” is false.
I’m still trying to figure out how Fox calling Arizona for Biden influenced the 2020 election. Can someone help a brutha out?
The one thing that we do know is that the Slug Potato Joe did not get 81 million votes. He did not get more votes than Obama so we know he cheated.
The claims have never been proven true or false. They have been declared false. Any disagreement with the declaration that the claims are false is a matter of opinion and therefore free speech. There is anecdotal evidence that the claims are true but they have not been investigated. Never before in history has the person who was leading a presidential election when people went to bed that night not won the election.
Claiming that the allegations are ‘false’ is editorializing.
Editorializing is defined as inserting personal opinions into objective statements.
If anyone suggested that there were irregularities that should have been looked into, the left flew into a hysterical tirade about conspiracies and endorsements of a stolen election. Their reaction made me suspect that something was being covered up that terrified them. It was very telling, to me anyway. To this day I believe there was massive fraud based just on how they react whenever the topic is broached.
Murdoch is a weak and foolish old man.
Trump lost the election by 43,000 votes in WI, GA,and AZ.
The essential issues are how many ineligible voters voted, and how many ballots had no verifiable chain of custody.
None of the top Fox News reporters were claiming mysterious computer issues with Dominion voting machines after the first week.
They may have reported the accusations about Dominion and interviewed various Fox commentators about Dominion, but none of the major Fox News reporters were claiming the accusations were true after the first week.
Now, when are CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, and NBC admit that they told lies about Trump (Russia Collusion, Fine People, WW1 dead “suckers”, Russian Bounty, etc., etc.) for the last 8 years?
Hey Rubert, the claims were not false.
Can’t control themselves. They just gotta editorialize.
How does he know the claims are false. Being a dumbass doesn’t make you a dumbass fart checker who is “always right”.
Prime time opinion hosts having suspicions , skepticisms about election fraud is perfectly natural and healthy. To claim otherwise is to know with certainty that fraud did not exist and no one knows that to this day.
They offered time to those that countered the establishment line. They reported, you decide.
Whereas, a CNN or MSNBC stenographer would adopt their opinions as gospel and peddle it as fact. They may be proven true someday,.....but I doubt it.
Stupid cowards.
Who cares what he has to say since he cannot prove a word of it.
Welcome to Opposite World.