Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Democrats and exiting impeachment Republicans pass Liz Cheney's bill, which allows voting 5 days after elections
The Blaze ^ | September 23, 2022 | JOSEPH MACKINNON

Posted on 09/24/2022 2:38:55 PM PDT by conservative98

On Wednesday, the House of Representatives passed a bill to alter the 1887 Electoral Count Act. The so called "Presidential Election Reform Act" revises rules pertaining to the congressional certification of presidential elections, which some contend will benefit Democrats. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), who lost her primary race in August and leaves office on January 3, along with Democrat Rep. Zoe Lofgren, both of whom are on the January 6 Committee.

[cut]

Extending elections

Among the changes this bill makes to the 135-year-old law is an extension of time for a presidential election.

In the event of a "catastrophic event" that has "prevented a substantial portion of the State's electorate from casting a ballot on such day, or caused a substantial portion of ballots already cast to be destroyed or rendered unreadable by such event," a candidate for president who appears on the ballot of the State can ask for an extension.

One of the criteria that must be met is that "the ability of that candidate to win the election with respect to one or more presidential electors" must be shown to be potentially affected.

If the criteria are met, time for voting in the election can be extended, but for "not later than 5 days after" Election Day.

A "catastrophic event" may include a variety of events or mishaps, from a major glitch in a state's voting machine software to rolling blackouts.

Tenney stated that not only is the bill's definition of "catastrophic event" broad, but as a law it would trample "on the core principle of state sovereignty and directly contradicts the United States Constitution."

(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cheating; cheney4ukraine; democrat; dickcheney; electionintegrity; elections; electoralcountact; georgewbush; illegal; josephmackinnon; lizcheney; neoconwarpig; rigging; tampering; tyranny; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: BigEdLB

I think so too...


21 posted on 09/24/2022 2:50:23 PM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

Murky may lay low. If it’s going to fail, she might not want to further annoy Alaska Republicans.


22 posted on 09/24/2022 2:50:55 PM PDT by gundog ( It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: facedown

Exactly what is happening during those five days?

“Oh, no, I missed voting?”

“My grandfather lived here and so did the previous guy at this house. I believe they would have voted Dem.”

“”10,000 more votes and five swing states go Dem”

“Trucks registered to Soros companies arriving to aid vote counters”

“Buyers’ regret over some voting for GOP say top TV news analysts.”


23 posted on 09/24/2022 2:50:56 PM PDT by frank ballenger (You have summoned up a thundercloud. You're gonna hear from me. Anthem by Leonard Cohen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Old news.
And it won’t pass in the US Senate either.


24 posted on 09/24/2022 2:53:28 PM PDT by SmokingJoe ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

She has the nerve to talk about threats to democracy.


25 posted on 09/24/2022 2:55:03 PM PDT by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Election laws are strictly for the states.
Won’t pass in the US Senate.
Plus it won’t even stand challenges in the US Supreme Court even if it did.


26 posted on 09/24/2022 2:56:17 PM PDT by SmokingJoe ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

That’s what I was thinking about unconstitutional


27 posted on 09/24/2022 2:56:57 PM PDT by BigEdLB (Let’s go Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

What a hero Lizzie is, breaking the Constitution in order to save it.


28 posted on 09/24/2022 2:58:09 PM PDT by nicollo ("I said no!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

She got “threats to democracy” alright.
By losing by a massive record close to 40% for an incumbent.
Chuckle.


29 posted on 09/24/2022 2:58:14 PM PDT by SmokingJoe ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

Democrats are not batting .300 in the Supreme Court.


30 posted on 09/24/2022 2:59:00 PM PDT by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Hey, give the Demoncrats a break. It takes a lot of time to garner votes from all their dead supporters.


31 posted on 09/24/2022 3:01:48 PM PDT by antidemoncrat (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Vote rigging: How to spot the tell-tale signs
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-37243190

“Delay in announcing results”


32 posted on 09/24/2022 3:08:02 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Hell no.

All states must vote on the same day and ballots collected and secured on THAT day. Want to make it a federal holiday, fine. But you’ve got 18 hours to submit your vote.


33 posted on 09/24/2022 3:08:41 PM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ought-six

It could be. The states determine the process within their own respective states.

````````````````````````````````````````````

Just one more encroachment on states rights.


34 posted on 09/24/2022 3:09:14 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: facedown
Laying more groundwork for one party rule.

They might think this, but if they continue down this path the only thing they are laying the foundation for is the destruction of the system that has given them everything they have. History has shown that it will not end well for them.

35 posted on 09/24/2022 3:09:42 PM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB
"Isn’t this potentially unconstitutional?"

Since when has THAT mattered?
But even if it IS ruled thus, then just 'revise' it - tweek
the wording a bit (inconsequentially) and vote again,
and the gist of the monstrosity will pass easily.

Possibly.

36 posted on 09/24/2022 3:13:55 PM PDT by GaltAdonis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Sore loser exiting replies last parting shot.


37 posted on 09/24/2022 3:22:49 PM PDT by Jean2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

Even Roberts will rule against it.


38 posted on 09/24/2022 3:24:02 PM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Sewer scum


39 posted on 09/24/2022 3:30:17 PM PDT by eeriegeno (Checks and balances??? What checks and balances?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave
so the democrats are taking took over elections back in 1960
40 posted on 09/24/2022 3:31:18 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson