Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate OKs $40B Ukraine aid bill for Biden’s signature
Roll Call ^ | May 19 | By Aidan Quigley

Posted on 05/19/2022 11:44:13 AM PDT by RandFan

A $40.1 billion aid package to help arm the Ukrainian military and provide economic and humanitarian relief is on its way to President Joe Biden’s desk roughly three weeks after he asked Congress for another emergency cash infusion.

The Senate voted 86-11 Thursday to clear the supplemental funding bill, with all of the “no” votes coming from Republicans. Biden is expected to sign the measure quickly, as Thursday was the day his administration anticipated Defense Department funding and “drawdown” authority to send weapons and equipment to Ukraine would run out.

The outcome was preordained after a 368-57 vote in the House last week and after the Senate voted 88-11 to proceed with debate on the measure Tuesday. A large majority of GOP lawmakers in each chamber voted to advance the package.

“Today the Senate will approve more lethal assistance for Ukraine, and it’s going to be a big bipartisan landslide. I encourage every senator on both sides to join this bipartisan supermajority,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said on the floor before Thursday’s vote. “The most expensive and painful thing America could possibly do in the long run would be to stop investing in sovereignty, stability and deterrence before it’s too late.”

There remained an undercurrent of skepticism among Republicans, however, who argued the package was too large and should be financed with cuts elsewhere in the budget.

“The vast majority of Americans sympathize with Ukraine and want them to repel the Russian invaders. But if Congress were honest, they would take the money from elsewhere in the budget or ask Americans to pay higher taxes or, heaven forbid, loan the money to Ukraine instead of giving it to Ukraine,” Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said during debate earlier this week. “But Congress will do what Congress does best: spend other people’s money.”

Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer blamed GOP reticence on fealty to former President Donald Trump’s “Make America Great Again” philosophy.

“It is beyond troubling to see a growing circle of Senate Republicans proudly oppose Ukrainian funding,” Schumer said on the floor Thursday. “It appears more and more MAGA Republicans are on the same soft-on-Putin playbook that we saw used by former President Trump.”


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 10percent4bigguy; 40billionforcrooks; americalastagenda; bankruptingamerica; bidenswar; crime; criminals; debt; defendukraineborder; hunterscashcow; inflation; neocons4biden; neocons4schumer; payyourtaxes; republicans4schumer; uketards; ukrainemafia; ukraineslushfund
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: All

I was worried that America wouldn’t piss a few billion in a pointless war this year


21 posted on 05/19/2022 12:33:32 PM PDT by escapefromboston (Free Chauvin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

“For they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind...” Hosea 8:7


22 posted on 05/19/2022 12:37:33 PM PDT by who knows what evil? (Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...siameserescue.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

40 billion in US Taxpayer cash for a bunch of criminals and scam artists in the Ukraine.

Zelensky and his gangsters will definitely get this cash into their offshore accounts as covertly as possible.

Only a fool thinks one single nickel of this stolen money will actually go toward “the war effort.”


23 posted on 05/19/2022 12:45:55 PM PDT by Prole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

And without any oversight!!!!


24 posted on 05/19/2022 12:58:22 PM PDT by BobL (Putin isn't sending gays into our schools to groom my children, but anti-Putin people are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Where’s the money to complete the border wall?


25 posted on 05/19/2022 12:58:59 PM PDT by SubVet72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Can they just pay off my house so I can retire in peace? Only a hundred kilobucks


26 posted on 05/19/2022 1:04:15 PM PDT by dsrtsage ( Complexity is just simple lacking imagination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

An arms race against who?
Russia is completely incapapable of sustaining an “arms race”. Even China really can’t, not against a focused US.


27 posted on 05/19/2022 1:26:05 PM PDT by buwaya (Strategic imperatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
“The vast majority of Americans sympathize with Ukraine and want them to repel the Russian invaders. But if Congress were honest, they would take the money from elsewhere in the budget or ask Americans to pay higher taxes or, heaven forbid, loan the money to Ukraine instead of giving it to Ukraine,” Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said during debate earlier this week. “But Congress will do what Congress does best: spend other people’s money.”

Sheesh, Congress. What on Earth is wrong with this way of thinking?

28 posted on 05/19/2022 3:07:40 PM PDT by CDB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

A focused US? Hah, that’s rich. The traitors and dip $hits in DC are borrowing enough to float two entire new Ford Class carrier battle groups to be pi$$ed away in Ukraine this week. A “focused US” would have spent that money where the real threat is, China. You have to remember that this summer NATO increases its border to be defended by 800 miles as well. The Russians seem to be holding their own against NATO or are you one of the fools who’ve been lecturing me about Russia’s imminent running out of gas, ammo, tanks, food, spare parts and generals since March 1. We’re arms racing with the Russians to the tune of $20B a MONTH, and that doesn’t even include the dark money billions. Reagan spent the Soviet Union under the table. My grandchildren aren’t willing to borrow the Russians under the table. A “focused US”, that’s the most ridiculous statement I’ve heard in a while.


29 posted on 05/19/2022 3:18:49 PM PDT by hardspunned (former GOP globalist stooge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

Nato increased its border, but added no new enemies. Russia added new enemies, AND their own border was also increased.


30 posted on 05/19/2022 3:28:58 PM PDT by buwaya (Strategic imperatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

They don’t have $40 billion to help homeless vets, but they have $40 billion to give to Ukraine, where no doubt much of it will be siphoned off by corrupt politicians. (CoughHunterBidenCough)


31 posted on 05/19/2022 3:29:13 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal is a blood-thirsty fascist yearning to be free of current societal constraints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreshPrince

Certainly not going to help the inflation. And as for handouts, we outta stop them all, and had the lunatics running this country not shut everything down over covid……well we would be in a lot better place I submit.

We are seeing shortages all over the country, but apparently there are no paper or ink shortages at those dollar bill printing presses 😀


32 posted on 05/19/2022 3:38:21 PM PDT by walkingdead (We are sacrificing American youth's future on the altar of our own fear. And it is a travesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

Men and equipment, yes. These are running out. Their current cadres are limited and are taking heavy casualties in Ukraine - all those dead colonels? Consider them proxies for all the dead majors, captains and lieutenants. And that does not measure the wounded, sick and worn out. They have never even tried calling up their reservists in the last 20 years, they have no system for mobilizing them. They dont have the cadre for them anyway.

They have very limited capacity for new construction. There are no great tank factories anymore. IIRC last week their one factory celebrated building 50 T90M’s this year. Consider that situation across the gamut of military equipment. They are living off accumulated resources, and are losing vastly more than they can replace.

Russian equipment stocks are all Soviet stuff. If they try rearm with these things they would have a 1985 army to fight the rest of this war.

Russian equipment and abilities displayed so far are underwhelming.


33 posted on 05/19/2022 3:40:39 PM PDT by buwaya (Strategic imperatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: walkingdead

Yep we are so in the hole won’t argue that!


34 posted on 05/19/2022 3:56:10 PM PDT by FreshPrince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

Yeah, yeah, yeah, the same hopeful disinfo. The exact, verbatim, trash I’ve listened to for ten full weeks. The bumbling, ill equipped, ill led, ragamuffin paper bear that has depleted NATO supplies to the point of provoking Xi and after tens of billions already blown, 40 more billion to clean up the remnants? Give me a dang break! The pentagon boobs even admit our commitment is open ended.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/05/14/the-pentagon-testified-assessing-ukraine-and-no-one-noticed/


35 posted on 05/19/2022 5:01:20 PM PDT by hardspunned (former GOP globalist stooge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

Your POV is rather odd. It comes, perhaps, of the difficult conditions you work under in the troll farm, or perhaps your supplies of alcohol are over-generous. Its hard to imagine Russian management being over-generous, but that my inexperience on these matters showing.

Anyway, the whole thing is now obviously a dogs breakfast, on the Russian part. Its even worse that the Russians have been fighting only a “ragamuffin paper bear”. Its really very careless, at least, to mislay a thousand tanks and other equipment in proportion, while failing to defeat the “ragamuffins”.


36 posted on 05/19/2022 5:12:34 PM PDT by buwaya (Strategic imperatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

I detest our leadership more than anything else in this world. All who voted for this should rot in hell!!!


37 posted on 05/19/2022 6:45:41 PM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FreshPrince

What is sad is seeing people like you carrying the water for the very people who hates us. The left loves useful idiots such as yourself.


38 posted on 05/19/2022 6:48:57 PM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Thieves


39 posted on 05/20/2022 4:16:38 AM PDT by eartick (Stupidity is expecting the government that broke itself to go out and fix itself. Texan for TEXIT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

Pretty trashy talk for a guy toting your big guy’s water to this quagmire. I really get tired of you hybrid neocon, Biden stooges.


40 posted on 05/20/2022 4:18:17 AM PDT by hardspunned (former GOP globalist stooge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson