Posted on 03/24/2022 11:31:29 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Former President Trump is suing Hillary Clinton, the Democratic National Committee (DNC), White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan and several others over allegations that his 2016 campaign colluded with Russia.
“The actions taken in furtherance of their scheme — falsifying evidence, deceiving law enforcement, and exploiting access to highly-sensitive data sources — are so outrageous, subversive and incendiary that even the events of Watergate pale in comparison,” a complaint filed Thursday said.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
“Good. Sue them into oblivion. A billion each - for starters.”
even better will be discovery!
Oh I didn’t know that. Excellent!
What difference ,at this point, does it make.
It’ll go nowhere but kudos to President Trump for trying.
“But, but, does he have................... STANDING???”
Just show the lawyer bills from defending himself from the first impeachment trial.
Discovery is gonna be a ball! Interrogators are going to draw blood,and depositions will bury these traitorous bastards.
Go for it Brandon!
Bookmark
(
“The actions taken in furtherance of their scheme — falsifying evidence, deceiving law enforcement, and exploiting access to highly-sensitive data sources — are so outrageous, subversive and incendiary that even the events of Watergate pale in comparison,” )
Absolutely the truth regarding the events that took place.
(NELLIE OHR)
She thought he was Dan Marino. /Hat tip to unknown FReeper
I hope that the uber-obnoxious “woman” Rachel Madcow is on that list. She did great harm.
The lawsuit left open the possibility of adding more defendants later as facts evolve. The defendants in the charging document all had a hand in fabricating fake charges and pushing it to the FBI and pushing it out to the media.
Disappointing damages claim.
Trump sues Hillary, Democrats for trying to ‘steal elections’
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/324644
Trump is suing Hillary Clinton and her ‘cohorts’ for $24 million as 2/3 of Democrats agree that she should stand trial.
Yep!
Has already given me a pep in my step today!
Thanks for the link to the complaint!
Southern District of Florida. Case 2:22-CV-14102
RICO claim based on theft of trade secrets and obstruction of justice.
Section 1961(1) of RICO also provides that “racketeering activity” includes any act indictable under 18 U.S.C. 1832 (relating to theft of trade secrets) and 18 U.S.C. 1503 and/or 1512 (obstruction of justice). As set forth herein, in furtherance of the scheme to defraud the Plaintiff, the RICO Defendants engaged in numerous acts in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1832 and 18 U.S.C. 1503 and/or 1512, including, without limitation, as set forth herein.
Count III Injurious Falsehood (18 U.S.C. 2701-12) (Against Clinton, Sullivan, Schultz, Danchenko, Sussmann, and Steele)
Count IV Conspiracy to Commit Injurious Falsehood
Count V Malicious Prosecution
Count VI Conspiracy to Commit Malicious Prosecution
Count VII Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (18 U.S.C. 1030)
A few more.
Lays out a couple hundred factual allegations, many with citation to supporting evidence. Demands a trial by jury. All defendants will move to dismiss (it would be malpractice to not do so), and odds are the case will be tossed by the courts. This is too big to expose, and too wrong to set right. Courts will not render a legal conclusion that favors Trump, even if he is in the right. Banana Republic does not roll that way.
First moves are motions to dismiss. Discovery only if the suit survives that.
Technically, tor triple that. He is claiming actual damages around 24 million. RICO allows recovery of treble damages.
I found it at the Treehouse: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/03/24/president-trump-files-a-massive-civil-lawsuit-against-the-entire-russia-conspiracy-scheme-team/
I agree about the motion practice which will also assert some or all claims are barred by the Statute(s)of Limitations. The legal battle should be epic.
For those who will be following the machinations, here is a link to Court Listener, or RECAP, which crowd sources documents that have been downloaded from PACER, the official Federal Court search webpage or website.
It shows what is filed with the Clerk of the Court (the Docket) and provides a downloadable free copy of what other users have downloaded from PACER and have shared through the RECAP app.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63184300/trump-v-clinton/
IIRC, default federal SOL is five years. Rico is four, but see rico.uslegal.com/rico-and-statute-of-limitation/ for caveats.
I figure there are other grounds, for example anything based on obstruction of justice is barred to civil complainants. Obstruction being solely under the province of the government sort of argument.
-- The legal battle should be epic. --
The press will completely ignore it.
👆👆👆👆👆unfortunate, but this👆👆👆👆👆
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.