Thanks for the link to the complaint!
Southern District of Florida. Case 2:22-CV-14102
RICO claim based on theft of trade secrets and obstruction of justice.
Section 1961(1) of RICO also provides that “racketeering activity” includes any act indictable under 18 U.S.C. 1832 (relating to theft of trade secrets) and 18 U.S.C. 1503 and/or 1512 (obstruction of justice). As set forth herein, in furtherance of the scheme to defraud the Plaintiff, the RICO Defendants engaged in numerous acts in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1832 and 18 U.S.C. 1503 and/or 1512, including, without limitation, as set forth herein.
Count III Injurious Falsehood (18 U.S.C. 2701-12) (Against Clinton, Sullivan, Schultz, Danchenko, Sussmann, and Steele)
Count IV Conspiracy to Commit Injurious Falsehood
Count V Malicious Prosecution
Count VI Conspiracy to Commit Malicious Prosecution
Count VII Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (18 U.S.C. 1030)
A few more.
Lays out a couple hundred factual allegations, many with citation to supporting evidence. Demands a trial by jury. All defendants will move to dismiss (it would be malpractice to not do so), and odds are the case will be tossed by the courts. This is too big to expose, and too wrong to set right. Courts will not render a legal conclusion that favors Trump, even if he is in the right. Banana Republic does not roll that way.
👆👆👆👆👆unfortunate, but this👆👆👆👆👆