Skip to comments.
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer to retire, giving Biden a chance to nominate a replacement
CNBC ^
| 26-JAN-2022
| Kevin Breuninger
Posted on 01/26/2022 9:02:22 AM PST by SpeedyInTexas
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer is retiring, NBC News reported Wednesday, giving President Joe Biden a crucial opportunity to replace the liberal justice.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1stcircuit; breyer; breyerretiring; breyerthestooge; carterjudge; clintonjudge; firstcircuit; leftystooge; peanutboyjudge; rapinbilljudge; scotus; stephenbreyer; supremecourt; thankstolinwood; theicecreamjudge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 221-230 next last
To: TBP
Does an Asian meet the race card requirement?
To: SpeedyInTexas
And what is his retirement date? I am guessing the perfect date to set up the confirmation hearings right at October/November to try to motivate a base that know their dementia puppet is a failure…
To: Sacajaweau
A liberal replacing a liberal...no change. Why do I think the nominee will be a super surprise...hmmmm...or not...
Might be Garland... to stick in Mitch’s eye..
143
posted on
01/26/2022 10:24:17 AM PST
by
TiGuy22
To: SpeedyInTexas
I am sure he is retiring because he knows the GOP will be taking back the Senate later this year. This is the best chance he has of making sure a liberal replaces him before he dies.
144
posted on
01/26/2022 10:29:39 AM PST
by
Preachin'
(I stand with many voters who will never vote for a pro abortion candidate.)
To: TiGuy22
Replacing an 83-year old with a 53-year old adds 30 years to the leftist bank.
145
posted on
01/26/2022 10:29:48 AM PST
by
campaignPete R-CT
(I owe, I owe, it's off to work I go ...)
To: SpeedyInTexas
I abhor the intimidation any justice receives to retire because of age. But, you know, color. And, female.
146
posted on
01/26/2022 10:37:23 AM PST
by
peggybac
(My will is what I wanted. God's will is what I got.)
To: Republican Wildcat
Yes, I’m afraid the replacement will be a thousand times more radical.
147
posted on
01/26/2022 10:39:51 AM PST
by
rdl6989
( )
To: JimRed
148
posted on
01/26/2022 10:41:01 AM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
To: Trump20162020
If Biden appoints a 'man' - we need to find bimbos who will swear he ran rape rooms in high school.
Why should we treat their choices with dignity when they drag our people through piles of sh*t?
If Biden puts up a woman find men who will attest to her slamming gay nonagenarian sexual weirdos.
Why should we treat their choices with dignity when they drag our people through piles of sh*t?
If they appoint a thing that doesn't know what 'they' are find street thugs who will attest to they's lies.
Why should we treat their choices with dignity when they drag our people through piles of sh*t?
149
posted on
01/26/2022 10:42:33 AM PST
by
GOPJ
(Ukraine's thugs paid off Biden's family BUT THEY DIDN'T PAY OFF OUR FAMILIES - No War. No way... )
To: fieldmarshaldj
Not anymore. She doesn’t need to have handlers and briefing books anymore on SCOTUS. Just vote due Left and don’t write any opinions. Pay’s good. Thinking minimal.
150
posted on
01/26/2022 10:43:51 AM PST
by
Eleutheria5
(Buck Foe Jiden!)
Ketanji Brown Jackson, most likely.
Obama's Army, clerked for Breyer.
This feels like a fait accompli, Breyer agrees to leave for his hoochie mamma, Miotch signs on, and the White Hospice celebrates with ice cream.
151
posted on
01/26/2022 10:44:05 AM PST
by
StAnDeliver
(Each of you have at least 1 of these in your 401k: Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, J&J, Merck and GSK)
Joe Biden is a radical liberal. He’s going to appoint a radical.
To: SpeedyInTexas; All
Sweet, we get to see every bone head politician make the exact opposite argument they made in 2018 and 2020
To: JimRed; SpeedyInTexas
BH0 is too lazy to accept the nomination. He would actually have to show up to work every day. And it would take him away from being the guiding force behind Biden’s presidency and establishing communist rule of this nation.
154
posted on
01/26/2022 10:49:03 AM PST
by
GreyFriar
(Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
To: ActresponsiblyinVA
155
posted on
01/26/2022 11:01:31 AM PST
by
TBP
(Decent people cannot fathom the amoral cruelty of the Biden regime.)
We could do worse than Judge Jackson.
She peppers her decisions with hyperbole. Witness AFGE v Trump (where also interestingly, she did not give the unions everything they wanted), particularly towards the end of a decision that she greatly overcomplicated, her flourishes punctuate every new paragraph:
- "For the grand finale, they reasons that clearly Congress must have intended for the President to employ this power to impact federal sector labor relations..."
- In so arguing, Defendants have (voila!) made a distracting shiny object out of an otherwise entirely unremarkable statutory exemption.
- "This Court now arrives at the final stop in the epic journey that the parties’ various claims and arguments have required it to consider."
- "The end is nigh. As explained in Part IV.D of this Memorandum Opinion, many of the challenged provisions of the President’s Orders..."
That reeks of Imposter Syndrome; at a minimum, don't expect Roberts to permit her to write much of anything -- including Dissents -- lest she embarrass the Wise Squatina and Keggers.
156
posted on
01/26/2022 11:03:01 AM PST
by
StAnDeliver
(Each of you have at least 1 of these in your 401k: Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, J&J, Merck and GSK)
To: plain talk
157
posted on
01/26/2022 11:04:53 AM PST
by
kiryandil
(China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
To: T.B. Yoits
Your next supreme court (in)justice...
158
posted on
01/26/2022 11:05:46 AM PST
by
RasterMaster
("Towering genius disdains a beaten path." - Abraham Lincoln)
To: D Rider
How is Biden “determined to be illicit by withdrawal of electors” ? In other words, what exactly does that mean ?, in your mind.
To: BillyBoy
I personally wouldn't be surprised if Xiden nominated Merrick Garland. That would open an old rift between both parties and could provoke the Republicans in the Senate to make a severe mistake, which would then be used against them in the midterms.
The Democrats are desperate to do anything to take the attention off Biden's continued failures and stick them on the Republican Party.
Whether or not they actually do re-nominate Merrick Garland, I expect they're going to put someone as equally, if not more controversial then him going forward so they can claim "mainstream" while trying to paint the Republican party as hood wearing KKK members. That's what the Democrats always go back to: calling any Republican opposition racist.
160
posted on
01/26/2022 11:13:53 AM PST
by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 221-230 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson