Posted on 01/07/2022 4:55:23 PM PST by TexasGurl24
paid ater 30 days, is that because they want to see if the shot taker is still alive, maybe they won’t have to pay?
What a repulsive discussion. Why the Bell is there any discussion of the efficacy of the vaccine? Or any medical topic? They are supposed to decide if the Constitution permits the mandate. Supreme. Kurt Nustices babbling about hospital capacity and how many kids have COVID??
And same for the discussion about negative impacts on industry. Meaningless!! If it had no effect on business it’s still not Constitutional for our government to force injections. I wish they would e gone straight for the heart. Many good attorneys could’ve done that. What idiots.
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
Military and federal employment-related issues aside, misguided (imo), post-FDR era, institutionally indoctrinated Supreme Court justices are predictably stubbornly continuing to ignore the states have never expressly constitutionally given the feds the specific power to tax and spend for INTRAstate healthcare (Obamacare unconstitutonal imo).
”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphasis added].” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824
By continuing to ignore Congress's constitutionally limited powers, post-17th Amendment ratification activist justices are wrongly helping to unconstitutionally expand the powers of the already unconstitutionally big federal government imo.
Corrections, insights welcome.
The ultimate remedy for unconstitutionally big, alleged election-stealing, Democratic Party-pirated federal and state governments allegedly manufacturing crises to oppress everybody under their boots...
Consider that the states effectively have "veto power" over continued unpopular, unconstitutional actions of the feds.
More specifically, the states can effectively “secede” from the unconstitutionally big federal government by doing the following.
Patriots need to primary federal and state elected officials who don't send voters email ASAP that clearly promises to do the following.
Federal and state lawmakers need to promise in their emails to introduce resolutions no later than 100 days after start of new legislative sessions that propose an amendment to the Constitution to the states, the amendment limited to repealing the 16th and ill-conceived 17th Amendments (16&17A).
In fact, I challenge the states to ram the repeal amendment for 16&17A through the ratification process faster than Nancy Pelosi irresponsibly rammed unconstitutional Obamacare through the House. /semi-sarc
Again, insights welcome.
No, the employees can get the bonus right away after they have been vaccinated, if they have already been there at least 30 days, it’s to keep people from going to work there and getting vaxxed and quitting right away. New employees have to be there 30 days to get the bonus.
I believe that the shortages on tests was deliberate BECAUSE if you choose test and there are none your are forced to quit or take the shot!! I believe that is WHY the administration decided against ordering the tests BEFORE the new outbreak!! Something VERY NEFARIOUS is going on with these vaccines they don’t work and YET they are STILL pushing them down our throats WHY?? Why are SO MANY healthcare workers leaving their jobs over these shots???
That is awesome.
They embarrassed themselves completely with their ignorance. I have no doubt that those two have MSNBC on 24/7 at home and in their office.
This bonus will NOT help with employees getting the virus the $1000.00 bonus is wasting his money!!
So it’s okay to require a vaccine document so you can go to work but it’s racist to require identification to vote. Makes no sense.
Sotomayor and Breyer need to at least educate themselves enough that they aren’t spouting nonsensical statistics before they vote on anything.
After her dumb statements Sotomayor should recuse herself.
How is a person that has not been vaccinated more of a threat than anyone else?
Some of you almost rabid numbskulls should ask yourselves this: Did you get vaccinated for your own protection or for the protection of everyone else?
SCOTUS (government) "MAY ALLOW (AKA require)" for some but not others are scary words.
What amendment will they allow for some but not others?
The first?
The Second?
So you think that threatening people’s jobs if they won’t take an experimental treatment falls into the area of merely “stupid”?
SCOTUS is emanating from their pudendums.
What are you going on about? I’m not vaccinated and won’t ever be.
Well, yeah — what else would it be?
If SCOTUS is leaning to mandates for health care, Osete and Murrill should have argued for SCOTUS vigorously defending religious exemption.
Seems like a good sign if the leftists are getting histrionic.
I guarantee you that is the other 800-lb gorilla in the room.
Another dumb move by government...just like quarantining well people...only to find out that almost 70% of new cases were those "well people" whole had been homebound.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.