Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court seems poised to block vaccine-or-test policy for workplaces but may allow vaccine mandate for health care workers
SCOTUS Blog ^ | 01/07/2022 | Amy Howe

Posted on 01/07/2022 4:55:23 PM PST by TexasGurl24

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
This is SCOTUSBlog's take on this. They tend to be left of center in their reporting.
1 posted on 01/07/2022 4:55:23 PM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

Split the baby, apply the tyranny slowly so as not to spook the sheep.


2 posted on 01/07/2022 4:57:56 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin ( (Natural born citizens are born here of citizen parents)(Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24
Makes sense — when healthcare workers who refuse to take the “vaccination” it reveals to the public that the “vaccinations” are not something to be accepted lightly.

So the SCOTUS statists will want to punish those workers for not obeying the party.

3 posted on 01/07/2022 4:59:09 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: TexasGurl24

I think that a vaccinate *or* regular testing requirement might be a reasonable one for health care workers...and maybe others as well. But a vaccinate or be fired requirement is *never* justified.


5 posted on 01/07/2022 5:01:23 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Covid Is All About Mail In Balloting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24
Indeed, he noted, most OSHA regulations apply only while workers are on the job, but a vaccination is permanent.

Good for Alito for pointing this out. It’s even more ludicrous when you consider that OSHA mandate is behind issued under an Emergency Temporary Standard. There’s nothing “temporary” about a vaccine.

Mandating a vaccine as a workplace safety measure is the equivalent of requiring construction workers to get hard hats surgically attached to their heads.

6 posted on 01/07/2022 5:01:34 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("All lies and jest; still, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/index.html


7 posted on 01/07/2022 5:02:28 PM PST by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

I’ve found Amy Howe’s takes mostly on the mark, so this may cause some folks some heartburn.

I’ve been listening to the audio. What the hell was going on with AJ Kagan? I don’t believe I have ever heard her so agitated.. It was noticeable.


8 posted on 01/07/2022 5:03:29 PM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fury

I noticed the exact same thing. I commented on that in the live thread. I have never heard her act like that before. It was very, very unprofessional.

She came off like a Karen. I think she has completely bought into the COVID stuff.

All three of the liberal justices were acting the same way. It was all emotion, no logic or legal reasoning, and they were shrill and angry. Sotomayor is always like that, but Breyer and Kagan don’t normally act that way.

I thought it might be because they know that the OSHA mandate is going to get struck down and they are angry about it but that’s a wild guess.


9 posted on 01/07/2022 5:06:08 PM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

Sotomayor and Breyer need to at least educate themselves enough that they aren’t spouting nonsensical statistics before they vote on anything.


10 posted on 01/07/2022 5:07:01 PM PST by FreedomForce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

Activist judges trying to write legislation.

What does the Constitution say?
Does the federal government really have power to say anything on this? Where?
And does the Constitution single out healthcare workers for a labor area where the federal government gets special control?
Is it OK to control this profession, but not that profession? How do we know where these lines are drawn?

The whole thing is totally inappropriate.
One might (possibly) think it’s all a really swell idea. But that doesn’t make it permissible.


11 posted on 01/07/2022 5:08:12 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (The experts are liars. The conspiracy theorists are the people who have figured out the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

It’s interesting because it was split on the law wording - Medical people because the medicare contracts state that they have to abide by government rulings to get the money. OSHA may get blocked because it’s outside their legal powers for workplace regulations.

I’m stuck under the executive order mandate for government subcontractors though and I don’t think either of these rulings will apply to me.


12 posted on 01/07/2022 5:08:17 PM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

No one seems to care that the treatment being mandated doesn’t stop the disease from spreading. It seems that the Chief Justice would approve a mandate for all healthcare workers to eat peanut butter and jelly sandwiches if that is what HHS demanded.


13 posted on 01/07/2022 5:09:06 PM PST by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

So much for “Heroes”


14 posted on 01/07/2022 5:09:20 PM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

I will also chalk up AJ Breyer’s 750 million number as he misspoke. But AJ Sotomayor - she’s a space cadet.


15 posted on 01/07/2022 5:09:39 PM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: devere

From a legal standpoint that’s outside the bounds of today’s debate. Yes, it applies, but the SC was strictly concerned about law - Does OSHA have legal power to give the order? Does HHS have legal power to give the order?


16 posted on 01/07/2022 5:11:42 PM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
"Split the baby, apply the tyranny slowly so as not to spook the sheep."

That's been the SOP of the left for decades, and it's worked. Republicans have willingly gone along.

17 posted on 01/07/2022 5:15:17 PM PST by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

I agree,I think a lot of the original proposed mandates were “or be tested” weekly. One local meat processor is offering $1000 bonuses to it’s employees to get vaccinated, the bonus goes into effect after 30 days employment. They claim they are having too many employees out sick or quarantined and can’t keep up production demands.


18 posted on 01/07/2022 5:16:39 PM PST by Quickgun (I got here kicking,screaming and covered in someone else's blood. I can go out that way if I have to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

The problems arise when there aren’t enough tests.

What happens when someone documents in writing that they have chosen “test”, and they can’t find anyplace to get tested?


19 posted on 01/07/2022 5:17:55 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((The more you tighten your grip, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: devere
It seems that the Chief Justice would approve a mandate for all healthcare workers to eat peanut butter and jelly sandwiches if that is what HHS demanded.

I’m not a big fan of Roberts, but in this hypothetical scenario he wouldn’t necessarily be wrong. As he correctly pointed out about ObamaCare, it’s not the job of the Supreme Court to overturn laws just because they are stupid.

20 posted on 01/07/2022 5:19:10 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("All lies and jest; still, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson