Posted on 11/20/2021 10:35:08 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
On Friday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s “The Last Word,” Rep. Gwen Moore (D-WI) stated that when she saw the judge in the Kyle Rittenhouse case throwing out smaller charges against Rittenhouse that “completely took the pathway, I think, to the conviction of anything further than that.” And that “as a black person, I probably am seeing what a fair trial looks like in some sort of twisted way.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
There shouldn’t have even been a trial. Stevie Wonder could see it was self-defense.
IOW, she figured the major charges couldn’t be proven, so she hoped they would be able to put him away for something.
The tear is a nice touch on the face of Grosskreutz. Was it photoshopped? I guess the tear was him realizing his $10 million lawsuit just got “vaporized” just like his bicep. lol
[[it’s all about race with blacks]]
They are enslaving the white man by subjecti g them to cknstsnt false charges of racism and white supremacy so that the white man has to wal, around subservient to whatever whims and demands that the black crowd wants to impose on them. If they say you are a racist, it would be racist of you to deny it. If they want to burn down your businesses,, or chase you through the streets shooting at you,, then you are a racist if you try to resist them.. if they are committing crimes,, and white cops try to stop them,, that cop is a racist.. if you use any term that they don’t like, you are cance.led and harassed and threatened, and attacked by mobs of angry blm members. If a white man is found innocent for defending himself agaisnt 3 white criminals who were trying to murder him ,why then he is a white supremacist because blm says so.
They own the white man now.
Affirmative action and low IQ go together.
I think the democrats are more upset a child rapist was taken out. Why do they support child rapists?
Yeah, but the smaller charges, even what the prosecution said he did was not illegal. It was a question of law, not fact. So she wants jury nullification in favor of the prosecution now?
I can see skin tone too as I have eyes, But when the person opens their mouth and starts to speak —— then I see the real person.
Rd later.
Yeah.
You know those current ‘laws’? Well, they don’t fit our narrative anymore. They shouldn’t be followed any longer. Justice is now just what we say it is, according to the whim of the collectivist, useful idiots.
How about possessed.
If she thinks she is seeing the system work in this case, and granting for sake of argument that it would not work as well for a black person, why not advocate to bring that proper working into all cases rather than try and diesrupt it for a boy who was there to help her community, and who ended up being targeted by the actual predators who were there to undermine her cause?
Black Supremacist
The lesser charges simply had no legal grounding. Can’t convict just because the jury wants to, there must be evidence the law actually applies - and it didn’t.
As a black person she’s as willfully ignorant as the day is long: the curfew charge was dismissed because the prosecution did not put on any evidence about a curfew. The weapons charge was dismissed because the weapon didn’t fall within the restriction set out in the statute. I k ow these are pretty tough legal concepts; I guess it’s just easier to emote that a drooling idiot
Only in America can a white man shoot three other white men and it is called a crime against blacks.....
Now I’ve looked at the embedded video. She looks like and idiot and dispels are doubts when she opens her mouth
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.