Posted on 06/25/2021 9:28:53 AM PDT by aimhigh
A Franklin County judge recently began including vaccination against COVID-19 as a condition of defendants’ terms of probation. Common Pleas Judge Richard Frye said Thursday he added the vaccine as a condition on three cases this week of the roughly 20 sentences he imposed.
He said he discussed the matter in open court with the defendants, and they attributed their unvaccinated status to procrastination. None raised any philosophical, medical or religious objection. “It occurred to me that at least some of these folks need to be encouraged not to procrastinate,” Frye said in an interview. “I think it’s a reasonable condition when we’re telling people to get employed and be out in the community.”
(Excerpt) Read more at go.tiffinohio.net ...
Can’t do that. Not approved.
Isn’t that unconstitutional to compel or force medical treatment?
The ‘aclu’ will be weighing in any minute now......
It’s a true “Naked Emperor” moment, but it remains to be seen who has the lungs to be heard saying so.
“We’d like to perform medical experiments on you. It could shorten your prison stay. Are you interested?”
There’s plenty of case law that supports the forced medication of prisoners to varying degrees. It’s not hard to imagine that courts would look favorably on this even if implemented as a condition of probation.
No less Constitutional than requiring a female perp (e.g., guilty of child abuse) to get her tubes tied as a condition of release.
Regards,
Only for mentally ill people and possibly serial offenders; not for something like a vaccine that has no relationship to criminal conduct.
Americans have no rights now. We have tyrants and bullies forcing evil upon us,
How will the judge ‘remove’ the vaccination after probation has concluded? Or does defendant have to sue judge to financially guarantee he will be made ‘whole’ from detrimental effects of the vaccine virus?
“Isn’t that unconstitutional to compel or force medical treatment?”
Gross violations of 21 U.S.C. section 360
and
The Nuremberg Code
Plus various medical ethic guidelines.
Well, it’s largely only come up in cases of antipsychotics...so far. But, the writing is on the wall that this is likely to be litigated for vaccines, soon.
Whether federal prisons could do this remains to be seen. But, since the 1905 Supreme Court ruling in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, it’s clear that police power of the state is sufficient to compel vaccination, in the eyes of the Court.
In the intervening years since Jacobson, the Court has had a few opportunities to walk it back and have passed every time.
Welcome to the late 1800s
Will we start having Fitter Family contests again? Forced sterilization?
TITLE 45
CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS
Part 46
Revised January 15, 2009
§46.109 IRB review of research.
An IRB shall require that information
given to subjects as part of informed consent is in accordance with §46.116. The IRB
may require that information, in addition to
that specifically mentioned in §46.116, be
given to the subjects when in the IRB’s judgment the information would meaningfully
add to the protection of the rights and welfare of subjects.
Informed Consent=Informed consent is the process in which a health care provider educates a patient about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a given procedure or intervention. The patient must be competent to make a voluntary decision about whether to undergo the procedure or intervention.
IRB=Institutional Review Board
Who says people have any rights? The government does what it wants.
Yes, but democrats and their rino ilk care nothing about laws rules and regulations
He’s a medical doctor?
That’s an illegal act. Judge dismissed!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.