Posted on 11/24/2020 7:25:39 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
Monday on Fox News Channel’s “The Ingraham Angle,” Laura Ingraham expressed her pessimism about the prospects of the 2020 presidential election going in Donald Trump’s favor.
Ingraham also disputed any notion that saying it was likely Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden would be sworn in was a departure from conservatism.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Oh, how I wish Ingraham is proven wrong!
She is being honest and we all know it. Fraud, for dang sure. Proof to throw out votes, I don’t know. Point being, make sure there is no fraud during election.
“I would be lying to you... “
Stop there.
If she and other presstitutes would talk up the FACT that Multiple States had their Election Laws Modified or Created by UNAUTHORIZED State Agencies in DIRECT Violation of Article 2 of the US Constitution, I believe the chances would be greater.
Makes you wonder why they don’t?
Anyone who works for Big, Corporate Media is compromised.
It is an uphill climb. Even if Trump shows incontrovertible evidence of theft the court could still rule against him “for the good of the country”...
Don’t kid yourself folks... anyone who tells you this is a slam dunk, even with all the evidence in the world is lying to you.
Fox News is dead to us. So is everything they say.
Don’t kid yourself folks... anyone who tells you this is a slam dunk, even with all the evidence in the world is lying to you.
+10!
Laura is not a prophet of God.
Well there is precedent for SCOTUS applying the Equal Protection clause with Florida in the Bush/Gore race.
But in that case Bush was in the lead and Gore was trying to get recounts.
I can see why Rudy is purusing Equal Protection and letting Powell pursue the Dominion stuff. He said Dominion would take longer. Both are important and critical to establishing election integrity going forward.
We can only undo what Biden/Harris do in the next 4 years if we have fair elections to vote him out.
But I’m still hoping Trump pulls this out. Never bet against Trump.
rIGHT, tHE sUPREMES MUST FIRST PROTECT THEIR OWN BUTTS. wITHOUT rEPULICAN OUTRAGE AND SUPPORT, THEY HAVE NO REASON TO GO OUT ON A LIMB.
And she’s absolutely right... there are NO guarantees with the SCOTUS.
This woman has a media death wish.
I have no clue how the SCOTUS would rule on President Trump's potential appeal to that court. Of course, the staunch conservative Chief Justice Roberts is now a swing vote. Why is it only supposed "conservative" Justices become the swing vote on the Court? I don't recall a liberal SCOTUS Justice ever becoming a swing vote. Only conservatives. Given that, I assume conservatives have only a 5-4 SCOTUS advantage. You know the three liberal Justices will vote to put Harris in office (oh and biden too). So Harris only needs one of five conservative Justices to flip and rule in her favor (oh and in biden's favor too). That's a concern.
She’s right. You point out reality here and get called a pearl clutcher.
I hope and pray that SCOTUS finds the proper penumbra that will allow them to deny the LIEberals the White House!
Those LIEberal bastards cheated, BIGLY!
Probably in all 50 states!
And do not deserve to be rewarded for their LIEs and DECEPTIONs!
President Trump won the election fairly and squarely, and should be re-inaugurated on Jan 20.
Why is it, that we’ve all seen some of the statistical analysis of the voter fraud. It’s clear and straight forward.
Instead of giving us her opinion on things, why not comment on the elections fraud. Sounds like Tucker Carlson did, why not you too, Laura?
I’m sick of these manbi pambi cowards esp the ones on FOX.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.