Posted on 11/20/2020 3:04:34 AM PST by Carriage Hill
We asked the Trump campaign attorney for proof of her bombshell claims. She gave us nothing.
On Thursday, Rudy Giuliani and a number of President Trump's other lawyers held a press conference on the topic of voter fraud. If you didn't actually see it, you've probably heard about it by now.
Giuliani, along with former federal prosecutor called Sidney Powell and a number of others, alleged that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump. To demonstrate that, they exhibited some of what they found after two weeks of investigating. The presentation went on for 90 minutes with many different threads, about which more anon.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Looks to me like Tucker Carlson has no concept of what the litigation process is and how it works.
Either Sidney Powell and Rudy Guiliani and Lin Wood will present compelling evidence or they will look like complete fools. Its that simple. There is no in-between given their repeated and definitive statements.
They don’t need to release it right this instant, just soon and they certainly don’t have any obligation to do so on Fox News.
Ahh...you can take Ingraham off that list.
Exactly. Eric Trump spelled it out. Sorry Tucker, nobody owes it to you to give you a scoop. That is particularly so given you work for Fox News which showed everybody who is not on the left that it is completely untrustworthy.
Whine all you want. I’ve stopped watching and listening to anybody from Fox.
What a weasel. He gets to look good for his leftist thug bosses and still pretend to be impartial.
Tucker will still get his substantial paycheck no matter who occupies the White House.
He doesn’t want to jeopardize that.
Even Jenna Ellis, near the end of the presser, described it as their “opening statement” of a long process WHICH WILL TAKE PLACE IN COURT AND NOT THROUGH THE MEDIA.
Get the globalist SHIT out of your ears, Ticker.
On that note...
Sean Kehoe 🇬🇧
@SeanAKehoe
·
8h
I was a litigation lawyer for 25 years. I would never have given my evidence to the media before giving it to the Court. Besides that, one needs to consider the safety of witnesses who could easily be suicided. Remember, the Clintons are not yet in jail.
Quote Tweet
Daily Caller
@DailyCaller
· 10h
Tucker Carlson calls on Sidney Powell to release evidence of her claim that votes were moved illegitimately by software from Trump to Biden.
He says he would have given her “the whole hour” on his show but she refused to provide evidence and told them to stop contacting her.
Tucker’s head has grown so big that he thinks presenting evidence to *his* show is more important than presenting it in a court of law. He knows damn well that it would be detrimental to the Trump team’s case to show their cards right now.
In January he spent at least a week criticizing Trump for ordering the assassination of Qasem Soleimani. He was as outraged as any TDS-afflicted lib about it. That was the last time I was a regular viewer. After this, I’m done being even an irregular one.
Time for ole Tucker to go down in flames with his FOX masters
This is from totally discredited Fox so who cares?
I agree completely with Supreme Court Justice Tucker Carlson: Time for Sidney Powell to show all her evidence! After all, Justice Carlson Tucker probably has a higher IQ than you do, has three law degrees from Harvard, graduated in the top half of his law school class, and won the award for best student in the political science department!
[Justice Tucker angrily bangs his gavel.] Hey, gw-ington! You're out of order, she's out of order, this whole courtroom is out of order! Why are you watching far-left Fox News anyway? Switch to Newsmax and OAN! [More Justice Carlson angry gavel-banging .......]
Just to be on the safe side: /s
..an embarrassed Laura Ingraham, who probably had a producer in her ear, “fact checked” Sidney on this issue the other night. Sidney sternly said that she could prove everything she was saying.
Lou Dobbs gives her fairer treatment. Tucker really messed up on this one...
His point is that so far they have not demonstrated enough physical evidence that would overturn the results in the contested states. All they have said publicly is the purely theoretical. Do they have enough to get the results overturned? I hope so but the burden of proof is on them. Also, time is running out. We are now about halfway through the 37 days that Gore/Bush
40% (and I suspect growing) of the population believes the election was rigged. That's an alarming level. If people stop voting because they lost faith in the integrity of our election system and feel they no longer have a voice in our government, then yes, violence will be their next recourse. I can live with the fact Trump lost fair and square. But I can't and won' accept Trump losing if there is concrete evidence of voter fraud and ballot box stuffing and nothing is done about it.
Agree. In the court room. Tucker knows that. He is following orders from Fox now.
Sidney was interviewed on Maria Bartiromo and said Tucker was rude and pushy and she told him not to contact him again. I can see that and don’t blame her.
She is more popular than Tucker.
Didn’t Tucker just mention that his presence on Fox will be expanding?. . .that “he isn’t going anywhere?” Sounds like he’s made a deal with the Devil. . .thus, dumping on Sidney Powell and reciting the “no evidence” chant, like a good boy.
Did you listen to the whole press conference yesterday? They were very clear why they could not give all the evidence to the public.
Tucker knows this.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?478246-1/trump-campaign-news-conference-legal-challenges
It is the full conference from Rudy's opening statement to the closing.
cspan also provided direct links to segments including raw closed caption text which take you to appropriate part of the video without having to hit and miss skipping to search.
The transcriptions are all in caps. My droid phone was unable to copy the text...maybe other viewing platforms allow for text copying.
Offering it to rebut the fifth column surrender monkeys with specific reference points. Clearly they, as Tucker Carlson, never bothered to listen to the presentation...lazy with short attention spans is my guess.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.