Posted on 11/20/2020 3:04:34 AM PST by Carriage Hill
We asked the Trump campaign attorney for proof of her bombshell claims. She gave us nothing.
On Thursday, Rudy Giuliani and a number of President Trump's other lawyers held a press conference on the topic of voter fraud. If you didn't actually see it, you've probably heard about it by now.
Giuliani, along with former federal prosecutor called Sidney Powell and a number of others, alleged that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump. To demonstrate that, they exhibited some of what they found after two weeks of investigating. The presentation went on for 90 minutes with many different threads, about which more anon.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Tucker has decided to go down with the ship.
No, the time to show the evidence is in the court of law.
Sorry Tucker. The press don’t declare winners in elections and the press don’t try cases.
— We asked the Trump campaign attorney for proof of her bombshell claims. She gave us nothing. —
This guy is being purposefully ignorant. They have given us reams of evidence, most of it first-hand witness affidavits. Rudy explained that they cannot release all of the name of the witnesses because of threats and intimidation.
The last 4 of Rudy’s videos on his “Common Sense” site give us many details and scads of evidence.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-9J07yyuXQTx_uZQchtwsg/videos
Tucker is a smart guy. I don’t know what his game is, but Tucker is being woefully dense.
Tucker has become such a putz lately. oh well Tucker, we hardly knew you.
I would suggest that the bulk of Fox ‘journalists’ are not able to do their own homework (same as CNN, MSNBC). What idiot would stand around for 3 hours at night to get packaged news from any of these networks?
Which will be soon I hope. Time is running out.
That’s what I said in #1.
Gee, tucker, do you promise to keep it secret until she uses it at the the trial?
Why not just call up dominion and show them everything that Trump's legal team has?
Tucker had his sincere, honest, baby face on when he looked pleadingly into the camera, and claimed that he wants to believe Sydney, but he just needs the proof.
When will he bring back the bow-wow tie?
I went cold turkey. I adored Tucker. After this comment, glad cut him off too.
She doesnโt have to show a thing to Tucker or the media and would be wise not to. Having said that, it is time for them to show their evidence in a Court of law if they hope to have an effect on this election.
duck duck go search result this morning using "Sidney Powell" news:
Don't use google, but can imagine the negative headlines are more extensive. Which no doubt gladden the hearts of the concern troll surrender monkeys on the board.
Don’t forget Hannity, Ingraham, Levin, Watters, Judge Jeannine, and Steve Hilton. They have not wavered in this election dispute at all.
Tucker has been threatened somehow back channel. The demons haven’t been applying the full court press that you’d expect in this “Joe won” situation because they know damned well it isn’t quite in the bag yet. It is hardly likely that they aren’t going as hard as they can in the back round though.
this is disappointing. i feel like TC did not listen to the entire presser.
I clicked my remote to Fox News from Newsmax just to see where Tucker was going last evening. As soon as he said that he had given Sidney Powell the opportunity to use his entire hour to present her evidence, and she did not respond to his invitation, I went back to Newsmax, and I will never go back to Fox News. At my house Fox News, the NFL and the NBA are in the same off-limits category never to be visited again.
God Bless you @molmccann
@TuckerCarlson needs to focus on our rigged election system & not attack those trying to fix it & save our republic at the same time.
@SidneyPowell1 @LLinWood @RudyGiuliani @VicToensing @lofly727
God help us all ๐๐บ๐ธ
Read & RT this thread! https://t.co/Vy7h11gQSoโ General Flynn (@GenFlynn) November 20, 2020
The MSM is drunk with power, and believe that they are the arbitrator of the law, and masters of the election. Screw ‘em.
dittos
He’s become like O’Reily — an attention whore... I know EVERYONE is waiting - but there are legal procedures that have to be followed for the evidence to be admissible... and Tucker does not get a pass on it - just because he has a top rated show... and this is what makes the MEDIA not likeable ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.