Posted on 11/19/2020 4:06:39 PM PST by Magnatron
A news briefing by President Donald Trump's legal team outlining details of his challenges to the Nov. 3 election was summarily dismissed Thursday by Fox News, whose reporter ostensibly called lawyer Rudy Giuliani a liar.
Without any independent verification, Fox News' White House correspondent Kristin Fisher claimed Giuliani's statements were "light on facts," "baseless," or "simply not true."
"That was certainly a colorful news conference from Rudy Giuliani, but it was light on facts," Fisher said in her report. "So much of what he said was simply not true or has already been thrown out in court."
Trump lawyers Giuliani, Sidney Powell, and Jenna Ellis outlined the president's legal challenge to the election results at a press briefing Thursday.
The allegations ranged from complaints Republican observers were not allowed to observe vote-counting in Philadelphia and Detroit to a claim by Powell that U.S. voting machines made by Dominion Voting Systems Inc. had ties to Venezuela.
"What I'm describing to you is a massive fraud," Giuliani told reporters.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
Ok so on one hand I have a highly experienced federal prosecutor backed by sworn eye witness testimony. On the other I have the chattering echo chamber who don’t even want to go find out what is going on.
Blob Bleckel?
I think they are told. Someone either briefs them before the show, or whispers something into their earpiece. Remember the show where Harris Faulkner had on Newt and some blonde Fox News Infoskank? Newt was talking about "George Soros DA's" and how they don't prosecute looters/rioters/vandals. The skank said "I don't see why we should bring George Soros into this conversation". Harris then paused, and there was an awkward silence and the segment ended. It was obvious that Harris heard an Obi-Wan type voice in her earpice saying "you don't need to talk about George Soros..."
Oooh....that would make a great tagline!
Might have to steal that!
All yours. :)
The legal suits filed by Giuliani so far have only been determinations of probable cause to proceed with an evidentiary presentation. The judge did not dispute the facts of the affidavits as untrue only that he didn’t believe the law required observers to “meaningfully observe” the ballots to determine signature validity or other legal requirements.
This is absurd on its face and reflects the dismissive political hackery of local legal systems. The evidence will be presented once they are through this legal jockeying.
“”That was certainly a colorful news conference from Rudy Giuliani, but it was light on facts,” Fisher said in her report. “So much of what he said was simply not true or has already been thrown out in court.”
And she never mentioned Sidney Powell.
Another good point. You damn right there were WMDs in Iraq.
“ Gee, what is happening to the media?????”
Ever heard of a government press? This is the USSR. Only those approved by the party are allowed to exist.
Fox went this way not because of an audience, but because they won’t be allowed to exist if they don’t tow the government party line. They know we are becoming the next USSR, and they’re trying to burnish their party bonafides so they’ll be allowed to exist when the expected hammer comes down January 21.
Her parents are hard core democrats. The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.
“Just wrote Tucker and told him that it’s sad, but so long as he is on Fox he is dead to me. Teeny bopper Kristin is a tw[i]t.”
Did you see the segment of Tucker talking about Sidney Powell not providing any evidence to back up her claims of massive fraud?
Correct amundo ..thanks.
But it is “community accepted knowledge” that “there weren’t any”.
Mainly because Rove told W to not say what we found, huge misstep there that allowed the mefia to craft the “accepted truth©” for the time forward.
“One thing I am surprised has not made the rounds was that Giuliani was sweating...”
Yes, it has made the rounds. With the country hanging in the balance, you and entire left choose to highlight that. Why not highlight what he said?
I can’t believe Fox actually showed the whole thing. It was damning.....for the Democrats
I believe that that snippy little faux snit was referring to Giuliani’s make-up running down his face when she called it a “colorful” press conference. Yes, I’m going there. Somebody turned the heat in the room up. Probably the snippy little faux snit.
And I just purchased the domain “FlushBiden.com just for the fun to come....
Fox was apparently paid to convince conservatives that Biden won.
They’re dead to me.
I really hope that is not a slam on Laurie Dhu. When she comes back to Fox, I will too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.