Posted on 11/09/2020 9:22:25 PM PST by bitt
We need a forensic investigation of the code to see why these “glitches” are happening.
I am pretty sure that not only the balance of the Senate, but also of the House, rests on these fraud issues not only in the swing states, but in other states and districts as well.
It sounds like a cheat and a betting bluff....a bet that the courts won’t order wide scale hand recounts of the ballots across the state and an audit of the vote ballot numbers in their sealed boxes. If the hand recounts don’t occur then the machine code frauds won’t be uncovered.
Alito was dissed and is probably pissed so I wouldn’t count on Alito and court not calling the bluff.
A choice could be offered....a quick in person only redo of the voting in the “questionable” states, a dismissal of the votes with the electors appointed by the legislatures of those states, or to send the entire election to the congress with a state by state vote to be done in January.
I’d be ecstatic if there was a computer error in WI that caused a 19,000+ switch in votes that, when corrected, would cut Trump’s deficit to only 1,500 votes. However, what Hot Air is claiming is that the final numbers in Rock County, WI were inverted, so that the true results were that Trump beat Biden in the county by 54.66% to 43.51% instead of Biden beating Trump by such amount. Trump got only 41.40% in Rock County in 2016, and the last time that a Republican presidential candidate carried that county was in the second Reagan landslide (1984). Yes, we have seen Trump win counties that we hadn’t won since Reagan, but usually Trump also had done really well there in 2016, not lose by over 10%. And Rock County is not dominated by a demographic group that swung wildly towards Trump between 2016 and 2020, such as Mexican-Americans in the Rio Grande Valley or Miami-Dade Latinos.
So the likeliest explanation for the discrepancy is that the original reported result of Trump winning the county by 9,500 votes was wrong because someone had input (or the computer assigned) the Biden number for Trump and vice versa, and that when the numbers were flipped later on it was a correction of the prior error. I hope that I’m wrong about this, but I doubt it. And while President Trump definitely should request a recanvassing and/or recount in Wisconsin, the margin that he needs to make up will be 20,000, not 1,500.
In the real world of engineering, a “glitch” is a transient condition that is almost always the result of a poor design which doesn’t account for all possibilities that can occur with input conditions.
In that sense, this is not a glitch.
The real question is whether these anomalies seen in the data are the result of innocent human error or deliberate malicious tampering.
It’s possible that the fraudsters intentionally created these “glitches” as bait for investigators. They were meant to be found, to distract attention from much more significant data tampering.
They will tell you that an entry error which gave votes to one candidate that should have gone to the other was the “innocent human error”, and a later correction was made which reassigned the votes to the proper candidate thereby creating the “glitch” which is seen as one candidate gaining the exact number of votes that the other one lost.
This is “plausible deniability”.
They are getting very busy trying to convince everyone Trump has no chance.
_________________________
Are they depressed establishment Rs or are they trolls?
I think many have seen that Ds are never prosecuted, so they have internalized serfdom.
Zapata County TX, first time since 1920, amazing.
Methuselah up in Tarrant County by a few hundred.
LMAO! bray, you tossed a rock at a pack of dogs, and you can tell the one you hit by the yelp.
If this goes to the federal level of 1 senator per state to submit their choice for the POTUS — do you think Trump will gain the majority?
This scenario is problematic as well — some senator will vote yes, but what’s the payoff?
This whole election fraud has poisoned so much - so quickly.
Seems that the 1 person for 1 state will be the likely choice ... having the states in questions re-vote again will demonstrate the Conservatives will show up - like they did on election day - the Dem’s will cry fowl that their supporters could not get out or were scared of COVID... sure, Trump wins and we all go on... but those cry baby little bastards will continue their onslaught of violence...
Watching this playing out is stressful !
I’m just north of Charlottesville — I saw that in Fairfax and wondered how many other counties - counted 1 vote for Biden 3 times !
I think Repubs have been demoralized over the years to just think they have been slowly losing the country. I think we need to consider the possibility that we have been the victims of a “long con” job... that the dems and their scams and voting machines have been stealing elections from repubs all over the country for years.
...a dismissal of the votes with the electors appointed by the legislatures of those states, or to send the entire election to the congress with a state by state vote to be done in January.
_______________________________
These two.
A redo for this many precincts is not feasible and many of those precincts are political machine-controlled.
Recounts impossible with so many fraudulent ballots.
I want to see a SCOTUS decision under the 14th and various Civil Rights laws that forbids the Ds from running any elections without Federal Marshall oversight AND forbids them suing under any Civil rights Act or 14th Amendment pretext for 40 years.
The owners of the software are the true controllers of the world. They need severe penalties up to and including all assets forfeit to pay reparations for any election where this program was used, anywhere in the world from its inception.
PPV executions after military tribunals would be a consideration.
THE CABAL THAT STOLE THE WORLD.
The senate votes for vice president one vote per state.
The vote is by state delegations in the congress...we’ll have 27 of them in January
...federal level of 1 senator per state to submit their choice for the POTUS ...
______________
NOT how it is to be done per the Constitution.
Decided in the House . Each state gets 1 vote. Majority of states are R legislature-controlled, which is the parameter.
This sort of question must be decided by those closest to the people, which is the House and those state caucuses are weighted by the legislative control in each state.
R control was not affected by this fraud. The Ds did not gain control in any state that was already R controlled.
The redo option was a Solomon like stinger option....it gives the fanatical dems an option to choose it but knowing that they would lose it they would probably take their chances with their state legislators(which could be lobbied to assign 1/2 the electors based on geographical support based on where each individual assembly person came from with the Senates of the affected states getting to chose have and the assembly the other half...the Governor could be allowed to choose one elector since he was voted on from all over the state. Then each side would feel it got something...Dems love stuff like that and I think there would be less chance Pelosi would reject the electors from pa based on such a process)
They could redo it if they really wanted to.
This would give Trump the lead. Biden is leading right now, and has for several days by 20,500 votes. If you move 19,000 votes from Biden to Trump, Trump will take the lead by 18,500 votes. Gateway Pundit is far too often click bait... NO ONE else has this, and if its true, it may already be baked into the number.
I can see Trump at 54% when all is said and done... but they will stop the investigating small fry once Trump flips the fraud. Trump 51.2% to Biden 47.8%.
In short, if absolutely no one voted in the 2020 election, Harris would still have won by the exact same numbers. As of right now, no one not the FBI or the DOJ is interested in pursuing this damming evidence.
The SOFTWARE is hard coded to cheat!
—
Not exactly. The software has openings which can be used by anyone to change the vote however much or often and leave no trace - one cyber expert parked car outside a polling place and, using his cell phone, was in the voting software in 3 minutes ... There are at least 4 different root places that the vote can be altered by managers as often as needed by as many votes as necessary. These systems were used in the 2018 elections and expanded in the 2020 election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.