Trump would be on glide path to reelection if 40,000 more "votes" were counted in his favor in WI, GA, and AZ.

[springwater13]

People rightfully are questioning what is going on in Pennsylvania with fraud but that state was not necessary to Trump winning the election.

Right now, he lost Wisconsin by 20,000 votes.

He is losing Georgia by 7,000 votes.

He is losing Arizona by 20,000 votes and still has an outside chance to win the state outright. Even if he loses, it will be a very close result like Georgia within 10,000 votes.

This election was extraordinarily close and Trump would be on a glide path to 269 electoral votes and a House state delegation tie breaker vote (which R's increased their majority to 29 states).

so,so,so painfully close. It makes you think the campaign erred in spending so much time in Pennsylvania and Michigan which had large urban democrat controlled areas.

Wisconsin was always the state most likely to go to Trump out of the blue wall.

[PJ-Comix]

WI---RECOUNT!

GA---RECOUNT!

AZ---RECOUNT!

And especially, PA--- RECOUNT!

How much do you think those totals would hold up on a recount?

[MHGinTN]

There is a counter attack coming. The CIA program Hammer Scorecard was used widely in this election. It changed vote counts the way Brennan wanted the outcome. THE Use of that program/algorithm is TRACEABLE, especially by the guy who created the algorithm mix for the CIA and blew the whistle on the obamaroids who used it to win in Florida in 2012. Don’t roll over YET!

[blueplum]

at 269, AK would come into play and AK is Red

[MagillaX]

I believe they are still trying to figure out what just happened with all the chaos and lawlessness that occurred.

There is no way to fix this election since it was screwed up from the beginning and President Trump is not going to allow fake votes to count and fake news does not certify the next president.

If you are so sure Trump lost, why worry what people think since the truth always comes out. But there sure seems to be a big push to declare Biden a winner. Why the rush

[MHGinTN]

It will depend on the way the recount is carried out. If just looking at transferred numbers, pshaw a waste of time. IF on the other hand it is carried out ballot by ballot, the CIA evil will be revealed.

[Peter W. Kessler]

AUDIT!!!

Then recount.

[Pearls Before Swine]

But there sure seems to be a big push to declare Biden a winner. Why the rush?

Wasn't it just last week that Hillary was advising Joe not to concede if the election was close, but to play it right out to the end?

[LastDayz]

Whatever.... Trump had already won by 3:00am Wednesday morning.

[grey_whiskers]

https://macris.substack.com/p/why-trump-will-triumph-in-pa-litigation

Excerpt:

Thus the situation as it stands is that there is still a petition before the Supreme Court to review the situation in Pennsylvania, it just refused to do so before the election.

Now that raises the question: What’s the situation in Pennsylvania? Let’s work through that.

In 2019, the PA legislature passed a law called Act 77 that permitted all voters to cast their ballots by mail but (in Justice Alito’s words) “unambiguously required that all mailed ballots be received by 8 p.m. on election day.” The exact text is 2019 Pa. Leg. Serv. Act 2019-77, which stated: “No absentee ballot under this subsection shall be counted which is received in the office of the county board of elections later than eight o’clock P.M. on the day of the primary or election.” I agree with Justice Alito: That is unambiguous.

Act 77 also provided that if this portion of the law was invalidated, that much of the rest of Act 77, including its liberalization of mail-in voting, would also be void. The exact text is: “Sections 1, 2, 3, 3.2, 4, 5, 5.1, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 12 of this act are nonseverable. If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remaining provisions or applications of this act are void.”

To again put this into common English, the Pennsylvania legislature passed a law that said mail-in ballots had to arrive by 8PM on election day to be counted, and then said that if the Court over-ruled that law, the entire law that permitted mail-in ballots was invalid.

In the face of this clear text, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, by a vote of four to three, made the following decrees, summarized here by SCOTUS:

Mailed ballots don’t need to be received by a election day. Instead, ballots can be accepted if they are postmarked on or before election day and are received within three days thereafter. Note that this is directly contravenes the text above.

A mailed ballot with no postmark, or an illegible postmark, must be regarded as timely if it is received by that same date.

In doing so, PAs’ high court expressly acknowledged that “the statutory provision mandating receipt by election day was unambiguous” and conceded the law was “constitutional,” but still re-wrote the law because it thought it needed to do so in the face of a “natural disaster.” It justified its right to do so under the Free and Equal Elections Cause of the PA State Constitution.

.
.
.
There is a strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution. Justice Alito writes: “The provisions of the Federal Constitution conferring on state legislatures, not state courts, the authority to make rules governing federal elections would be meaningless if a state court could override the rules adopted by the legislature simply by claiming that a state constitutional provision gave the courts the authority to make whatever rules it thought appropriate for the conduct of a fair election.”

Justice Alito is referring to the following clauses of the US Constitution:

Art. I, §4, cl. 1, which states “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof.”

Art. II, §1, cl. 2, which states “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.”

Again, translating this into common English, the US Constitution grants state legislators the exclusive right to prescribe the time, place, and manner of holding elections, and to direct the appointment of the electors.

= = = = = =

If Pennsylvania mixed the ballots, (*smirk* “what can you do now?”) then the Supreme Court rules 9-0 for Trump; they do not look kindly on anyone flipping them the bird.

[Regulator]

PA will be easier to throw out crap ballots under the sequestration order. The Philadelphia BS can be easily overturned.

No way was he up 700,000 votes and that gets steamrolled on absentee ballots alone.

[MHGinTN]

Why the rush? Because such a declaration cowers judges from following law since they are accused of changing the outcome. Fox news was first in line to serve the leftist meme.

[over3Owithabrain]

Definitely more coming. Lin Wood is a legal assassin and he sounds very confident. Pence sounds confident. The Prez went golfing today and took pics laughing with a wedding party.

[LastDayz]

LOL.... the magic ballot fairy.

[Dilbert San Diego]

for whatever reason, the media decided in unison that today was the day to declare Biden the winner. The news all day has shifted into election night mode, in which they are talking about what Biden will do, who will be in his cabinet, etc. The media have decided this election is over.

I know nothing is official yet in any state. I’m just saying the media decided in concert to declare it’s over. The fact that there are ongoing challenges to be made to various states is ignored as the media decided today was the day to end the election.

[Zhang Fei]

It was 37 days after Election Day that 2000 was decided. It ain’t over yet. Best of all, Trump can not only call on the resources of his small dollar donors - he can also dig into his personal resources for the tens of millions of dollars required for this effort. Fingers crossed.

[sitetest]

Not recount, but re-canvass, and question the validity of every ballot. And other judicial remedies, if necessary.

[SelfhatingMillennial]

Is it an honest recount? Will we be allowed to watch? Will fraudulent ballots be tossed?

If so, GAME OVER. A Biden win with the current published “numbers” and “turnout” is statistically impossible. IMPOSSIBLE. The math is undeniable that fraud did happen and is happening.

[Zhang Fei]

[I know nothing is official yet in any state. I’m just saying the media decided in concert to declare it’s over. The fact that there are ongoing challenges to be made to various states is ignored as the media decided today was the day to end the election.]

---

President Gore would disagree that the media decides elections.

[Don Corleone]

3 SUV’s and a couple of sedans could do it.