Posted on 11/02/2020 7:08:54 AM PST by Enlightened1
While the law enforcement and intelligence community, along with the mainstream media, has been pushing the meme that there is no basis to believe that Seth Rich, as claimed by multiple independent sources, had contact with Julian Assange’s Wikileaks, the evidence suggests otherwise and it turns out the FBI has been covering up more relevant documents.
The first hint of the coverup came from David Hardy, an FBI Senior official, who affirmed in a 2017 affidavit that there were no responsive records. Hardy is the Section Chief of the Record/Information Dissemination Section (“RIDS”), Information Management Division (“IMD”),1 Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), in Winchester, Virginia. Here are the relevant portions of his first affidavit:
(19) CRS Search and Results. In response to Plaintiff’s request dated September 1, 2017, RIDS conducted an index search of the CRS for responsive main and reference file records employing the UNI application of ACS. The FBI searched the subject’s name, “Seth Conrad Rich,” in order to identify files responsive to Plaintiff’s request and subject to the FOIA. The FBI’s searches included a three-way phonetic breakdown5 of the subject’s name. These searches located no main or reference records responsive to Plaintiff’s FOIA request.
(9) By letter executed on November 9, 2017, OIP advised Plaintiff it affirmed the FBI’s determination. OIP further advised Plaintiff that to the extent his request sought access to records that would either confirm or deny an individual’s placement on any government watch list, the FBI properly refused to confirm or deny the existence of any such records because their existence is protected from disclosure pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(E). . .
David Hardy either was lying or dangerously incompetent. The FBI did have documents–emails to be specific. The FBI’s habit of stonewalling or denying..
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
FBI is an enemy of the Republic and needs to be dismantled asap.
Yes. Some people seem to feel that firing Wray might fix stuff. This is not fixable. They need to disband the FBI and put 100% of the workers on a “do-not-hire” list for federal employment.
Just fire every Democrat FBI agent, that will reduce corruption by a large percentage.
Maybe its time for a German-style “Truth Commission”
Trump can cement his place in history by declaring the FBI will be re-made and re-built, after all its files are first opened and revealed.
The FBI killed Epstein. The FBI at the direction of the Hillabitch Clintdog killed Seth Rich.
:: The FBI’s searches included a three-way phonetic breakdown5 of the subject’s name. ::
That’s all well and good but phonetic and CSR avoiding changes are different things.
Case-in-point: Jarnes 8. Corney
The FBI sure seems to misplace an awful lot of documents.
How do we get a handle on these treasonous agencies
Yet the FBI is supposedly the “premier” exemplar for law enforcement??? sigh
many repubs are as bad or worse.
How do we get a handle on these treasonous agencies//
Well,
#1 sedition and insurrection acts
#2 GITMO
#3 military tribunal
#4 gallows
#5 pigs blood
#6 burial at sea
,,just an idea.
“Just fire every Democrat FBI agent, that will reduce corruption by a large percentage.”
No, they ALL need to go. Every last one. The rot is from top to tap root and bark to core.
The FBI has been a corrupt organization since Hoover. He taught them their dirty tricks and put sycophants in positions of authority. Those sycophants continued on in the Hoover tradition.
If a national investigative force is needed then simply expand the scope of the US Marshals service. They are the oldest law enforcement organization having been founded by President George Washington.
Let them take over from the FBI, ensuring that no current FBI employees remain.
Problem solved.
Do you have to be a lying dirt bag before you apply or do they teach you that at Quantico?
Asking for a friend...
His name was Seth Rich
5&6 special John brennon treatments
In todays FBI, how would you know the difference between a RAT and a REP?
When you think about who has been hiring FBI people for the last 30 years - is it any wonder they are corrupt?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.