Posted on 10/19/2020 4:33:41 AM PDT by Lazamataz
Hey Lar, couldn’t link your animated gif, but found it again outside the Twitter sphere of oppression. Did a pretty good job matching it. :)
Ping
Nine months ago, the Democrats were CERTAIN that impeachment would be the club they used to beat Trump.
It is telling that you hardly ever hear them say the word “impeachment” anymore.
All true.
But logic like this never stopped an Antifa’rally’...
I think in my neck of the woods they might have solved the early voting issue. Offer previously impossible to get free WuFlu quick testing to any and all just to time to make sure you’re locked up for election day if you test positive.
If we have a sudden rash of positives, be interesting to see what percentage are Republican.
Voting absentee is one thing, voting by mail is another. Different instructions, etc. We’re already seeing record numbers of ballot rejections, and it’s going to get worse. This could turn into a blowout because people can’t follow directions lol. Winning is winning, though; I’ll take it.
It is telling that you hardly ever hear them say the word “impeachment” anymore.
—
Because IMPEACHMENT = HUNTER BIDEN
I think they have known all along they would lose and so they threw all in on Biden because he was the oldest and least effective and will sooon be forgotten.
I also think even though they know they would lose they also know they had nothing to lose and so they would throw everything they have just in case it would change the tide. Plus they have early voting, harvesting strategies they have been refining for years.
JUst my feeling, but I think Nancy and the oldsters of the Dem party will be swept away next.
red china could still cause an incident in taiwan
Does this mean on election night we will see an initial wave of Democrat votes, because the VBM has already been counted?
A question about “conceding”. There’s a lot of discussion most years over whether the loser should have conceded or not.
Gore conceded, but then changed his mind and it was a big deal.
Obama told PIAPS to concede, and everyone waited for that.
Didn’t Nixon concede to Kennedy, even though he knew there was fraud?
Now PIAPS is telling Traitor Joe not to concede under any circumstances.
Is a loser’s concession required by law to make a winner official? Can’t the obvious winner just say, “Screw you. I won. Concede if you want, but I don’t care.”?
Thanks Laz,
The Twittme link has already been pulled. You beat it! (no sarcasm intended)
So, let’s get out there and encourage Dems to submit their mail-in ballots!
That way, WE will know how many votes it will take to win the election...legitimately.
Stacy Abrams never conceded her race in GA. It just made her look ridiculous.
Only two things to watch: Polls shutdown due to COVID. Secretary of States. Bush v Gore was not decided by Supreme Court. They just honored the Florida Secretary of State. I do not know what the breakdown of D and R Secretary of States in swing states, but it does make a huge difference if it is not a total blowout.
Oh, yeah. Abrams still believes she’s governon. LOL!
But concessions isn’t a requirement, right? It’s just courtesy...?
The fear that polls will not be accessible to voters on Nov 3 is why I voted early for the first time ever. Could it be that Dem governors are keeping their own economies from recovering so they can have an excuse to close polls on Nov 3?
All that would do is add 3 points to Trump's election totals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.