Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Durbin: Republicans Have Been Packing the Court for the Past Three-and-a-Half Years — ‘They Brag About It’
Breitbart ^ | 11 Oct 2020 | Pam Key

Posted on 10/11/2020 9:15:47 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) said Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that Republicans have bragged about “packing the court” under President Donald Trump.

When asked if he will expand the number of justices on the Supreme Court if Judge Amy Coney Barrett is confirmed in a clip, Democratic nominee former Vice President Joe Biden said, “You will know my opinion of court-packing when the election is over. Look, the moment I answer that question, the headline in every one of your papers will be about that. Other than focusing on what’s happening now.”

Anchor Chuck Todd said, “Senator Durbin, did the fact that Vice President Biden used the phrase court-packing, was that a tell of where the vice president stands on this, that he doesn’t want to see this happen?”

Durbin said, “I can tell you that we’re getting this question. It’s a common question being asked because the American people have watched the republicans packing the court on bias the past 3 1/2 years and brag about it. They’ve taken every vacancy and filled it. They sent us, and we approved, only with their votes I might add, ten people whoa have been judged unanimously unqualified by the American Bar Association. Do you know how many judicial nominees came from Obama, who was judged unanimously unqualified? None. So we are dealing with people on the court packed into the court with little or no qualifications who are going to be there for a long time. So it’s understandable. The Republicans raise the issue of court-packing.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: acb; article2section2; braking; durbin; durbthedick; fakenews; judiciary; liberalagenda; notpackingthecourts; politicaljudiciary; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Dick Turbin earning his CCP paycheck.
1 posted on 10/11/2020 9:15:47 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

More insanity


2 posted on 10/11/2020 9:17:19 AM PDT by vigilante2 (Make liberals cry again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Durbin is a lying dfps. He knows “packing the court” doesn’t mean filling constitutional vacancies. He is depending on his supporters to be uninformed.


3 posted on 10/11/2020 9:19:09 AM PDT by Savage Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Is “packing” dog whistle for “filling a vacant seat?”


4 posted on 10/11/2020 9:19:58 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Mocking Liberals is not only a right, but the duty of all Americans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Yes Dick, and what was Constitution hating Obama doing with his appointments?

Selecting objective Constitutionalists?

5 posted on 10/11/2020 9:20:23 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no merit in compromising with the Devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

False “court packing” narrative #1 STARTED.


6 posted on 10/11/2020 9:22:24 AM PDT by doc maverick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Mr. Durban is confused (again) President Trump is NOT packing the courts...he is filling vacancy's...there IS A DIFFERENCE.
7 posted on 10/11/2020 9:22:42 AM PDT by yoe (Vote for President Trump!..Keep America Great and protected by the US. Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Rider

> He knows “packing the court” doesn’t mean filling constitutional vacancies. He is depending on his supporters to be uninformed. <

Bingo. As Goebbels said, tell a lie big enough and people will believe it.


8 posted on 10/11/2020 9:24:13 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Savage Rider

>>He knows “packing the court” doesn’t mean filling constitutional vacancies. He is depending on his supporters to be uninformed.<<

Clearly and sadly a well-founded dependency.


9 posted on 10/11/2020 9:24:59 AM PDT by freedumb2003 ("Do not mistake activity for achievement." - John Wooden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Durbin is another entry on the Wall list...

All in all, he’ll just be up against the wall...with apology to Roger Waters...


10 posted on 10/11/2020 9:25:44 AM PDT by MCEscherHammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The Dims are trying to change the definition of “packing the court”, to deflect from what they and Biden are planning to do. Of course the media is complicit and will follow their narrative instead of challenging them on it.


11 posted on 10/11/2020 9:26:56 AM PDT by throwthebumsout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Turban forgets that elections have consequences.

Turban ranks pretty high on my Senators that are Bald-faced Liars and whom I find Repulsive List


12 posted on 10/11/2020 9:29:02 AM PDT by sauropod (Let them eat kale. I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Why didn’t obiden fill those vacancies?


13 posted on 10/11/2020 9:29:04 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vigilante2

The rats are filling the room with smoke by exploiting the Confusion surrounding the meaning of packing the court. Harris launched this effort at the debate. We are going to start hearing “Trump has been packing the court with white conservatives for three years” thereby moving the question of packing away from the true issue. Biden will use this to shift to question away from adding more SC justices. With MSM help he will probably get away with it.


14 posted on 10/11/2020 9:30:47 AM PDT by iamgalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Savage Rider

It’s the latest DNC talking point, and it’s the best they can come up with.


15 posted on 10/11/2020 9:32:32 AM PDT by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
ten people whoa have been judged unanimously unqualified by the American Bar Association. Do you know how many judicial nominees came from Obama, who was judged unanimously unqualified? None.

The ABA has become a bunch of leftists hacks. You might as well complain about judges who have been declared unanimously unqualified by the CPUSA. Were any of Obama's nominees judged unanimously unqualified by right wing groups? And would Durbin have cared?

16 posted on 10/11/2020 9:32:40 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (In 2016 Obama ended America's 220 year tradition of peaceful transfer of power after an election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

They only drag Durbin out when they are on the ropes.


17 posted on 10/11/2020 9:38:00 AM PDT by mylife (Opinions: $1, Today's Special: Half Baked, 50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

All other lies have failed, release the Durbin!


18 posted on 10/11/2020 9:38:51 AM PDT by mylife (Opinions: $1, Today's Special: Half Baked, 50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

Yeah, and doing their mandated Constitutional role concerning the Judiciary is packing, i.e., political, too.


19 posted on 10/11/2020 9:42:53 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (The only thing worse than COVID-19 is Biden-20!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

And of course, Chuck Todd never corrected Durbin by mentioning that what Trump did was NOT “packing.”


20 posted on 10/11/2020 9:50:57 AM PDT by FroggyTheGremlim (I'll be good, I will, I will!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson