Posted on 10/02/2020 12:50:37 PM PDT by KeyLargo
* August Lindsay
Fox News Cuts Off Dr. Oz After He Admits The Flu Shot Increases Chances of Getting COVID-19
Fox News has been cutting off recent guests as they try to comment on riots and Covid-19. During an interview earlier in the week with Newt Gingrich, Fox News host, Harris Faulkner cuts off her guest and tells him they cannot speak of Democratic Supporter and Hungary native, George Soros.
Yet again, the Fox News host is seen below cutting off Dr. Oz as he tries to warn people of the connections between the flu shot and COVID-19.
(Excerpt) Read more at firstamericannewsinsider.com ...
LOL.
I heard Robert Plant when I read that.
Good point.
Then, I was successful! LOL.
I’ll tell you why: stupid and gimmicky—a guy guest surrounded by babes who actually agree with him on most things, so where’s the conflict, or even interest? The ONLY one on FOX who recognizes the real issues out there and addresses them exclusively and with passion and humor is TUCKER. without him FOX would start drifting into the waters of CNN and MSNBC.
I blame us. When PBS fired him 10 years ago for having a cogent thought about muslims, we raised a ruckus and Fox hired him.
Then we found out it was just a brain fart.
My supermarket chain (Publix) is even giving out a $10 store gift certificate with each free shot as a nice little bonus !
Leni
Is this true? I thought the opposite--that they have adjuvants in addition to the immunizing antigen to raise the immune sensitivity.
The concern only lasts a couple of days as your body fights the flu shot.
People who received the trivalent influenza vaccine during the 2008-2009 flu season were between 1.4 and 2.5 times more likely to get infected with pandemic H1N1 in the spring and summer of 2009 than those who did not get the seasonal flu vaccine
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study on ferrets confirmed the results, showing the seasonal influenza vaccine did worsen symptoms after subsequent exposure to the H1N1 virus
A 2011 study found the seasonal flu vaccine may weaken children’s immune systems and increase their chances of getting sick from influenza viruses not included in the vaccine
In a 2012 study, children receiving inactivated influenza vaccines had a 4.4 times higher relative risk of contracting noninfluenza respiratory virus infections in the nine months following their inoculation
A 2020 study found people were 36% more likely to get some form of coronavirus infection if they had been vaccinated against influenza
In a June 12, 2020, Science editorial, Michael Osterholm, virologist and director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, and Edward Belongia, director of the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Population Health at the Marshfield Clinic Research Institute in Marshfield, Wisconsin write:1
“There are important differences in the epidemiology of COVID-19 and seasonal influenza, but symptoms overlap … The prospect of a second COVID-19 wave requires planning to ensure optimal delivery of influenza vaccines starting in the early fall …
The optimal timing of influenza vaccination in patients with confirmed COVID-19 is uncertain. There are no clinical studies on the effects of influenza vaccination in patients with COVID-19, but it may be prudent to delay vaccine administration until after the acute illness has resolved …
Will there be a perfect storm of COVID-19 and influenza during the 2020–2021 season? We do not yet know, but we must start preparing in the coming months.”
‘False Claim’ Is Based on Published Science
Osterholm and Belongia stress there is a “false claim that influenza vaccination increases the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection” promoted by Judy Mikovits and circulating online, and that “Scientists, health care providers, and public health leaders must counter these claims with clear, evidence-based information on the importance of influenza vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
But this so-called “false claim” is not a rumor pulled out of thin air. As is so often the case, Osterholm and Belongia are actually insulting fellow virologists and researchers when slapping a hoax label on such claims, seeing how there is published research showing that, yes, influenza vaccination appears to worsen outcomes during viral pandemics.
If Osterholm and Belongia wanted to be factual and clear, they should dissect the actual studies using scientific methods and reasoning, and not just dismiss them as made-up internet hoaxes.
The fact that peer-reviewed studies have come to the conclusion that previous flu vaccination seems to increase patients’ risk of contracting more severe pandemic illness at least worthy of consideration and review.
I’m not surprised though, seeing how Osterholm appears to routinely ignore the reality of published science. In a March 10, 2020, interview with Joe Rogan,2 in which the question of SARS-CoV-2’s origin came up, Osterholm stated that “we could not have crafted a virus like this to do what it’s doing; I mean we don’t have the creative imagination or the skill set.”
This simply does not line up with reality. Again, published research shows we clearly have the technology, know-how and “creative imagination” to create SARS-CoV-2.
Flu Vaccine Increased Risk of Pandemic H1N1
So, what is the basis for these claims? Research raising serious questions about flu vaccinations and their impact on pandemic viral illnesses include a 2010 review3,4 in PLOS Medicine, led by Dr. Danuta Skowronski, a Canadian influenza expert with the Centre for Disease Control in British Columbia, which found the seasonal flu vaccine increased people’s risk of getting sick with pandemic H1N1 swine flu and resulted in more serious bouts of illness.
People who received the trivalent influenza vaccine during the 2008-2009 flu season were between 1.4 and 2.5 times more likely to get infected with pandemic H1N1 in the spring and summer of 2009 than those who did not get the seasonal flu vaccine.
In all, five observational studies conducted across several Canadian provinces found identical results. These findings also confirmed preliminary data from Canada and Hong Kong. As Australian infectious disease expert professor Peter Collignon told ABC News at the time:5
“Some interesting data has become available which suggests that if you get immunized with the seasonal vaccine, you get less broad protection than if you get a natural infection …
We may be perversely setting ourselves up that if something really new and nasty comes along, that people who have been vaccinated may in fact be more susceptible compared to getting this natural infection.”
Click here to read more. https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/09/08/will-the-flu-shot-help-with-coronavirus.aspx
In my research, some level of immunosuppressant is used in Vaccines to allow the contents to get past our natural immunities. Otherwise our immune systems would render the vaccine useless
Oh very clearly. That’s why I don’t believe conspiracy theory nonsense.
In In my research, some level of immunosuppressant is used in Vaccines to allow the contents to get past our natural immunities. Otherwise our immune systems would render the vaccine useless
In my research, some level of immunosuppressant is used in Vaccines to allow the contents to get past our natural immunities. Otherwise our immune systems would render the vaccine useless
The whole “conspiracy theory” insult was invented by the CIA as a means to throw people off the truth about what they actually are doing or have done.
No. It comes from morons who think everything is some giant conspiracy and wave around stupid labels like “big pharma”.
He looked at me like I was insane, but I don't care. I probably am.
... and I'm sure people like Brennan get cheap thrills in seeing how far away from reality they can steer people with the CIA's spin on the facts. It's a sick power trip.
Concur. Exactly.
The veteran site article summarizes a Elsevier paper, which says if you take the flu vaccine, it might indirectly suppress your reaction to coronavirus, because when you fight off the real flu, it upregulates your nonspecific ( intrinsic and innate ) immune responses.
Children have good innate and intrinsic immune systems and rarely get covid19, which shows a good innate and intrinsic immune system is sufficient to fight it off. Old people have good adapative immunity, which protects you against pathogens you have been attacked by before, and much weaker intrinsic and innate immunity. Since sars-cov2 is novel, you havent had it before. Old people are at risk.
To have an effective vaccine, ideally you want to: 1 get it to the same tissue, 2 have inflammation at the site to get a good immune reaction to a vaccine. Thats why they use the forked needles to make a raw wound on the skin for the smallpox vaccine.
There may be a few vaccines that use weak live virus vectors such as adenovirus, with which using an immunosuppressant would make sense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.