Posted on 06/29/2020 7:59:59 AM PDT by stars & stripes forever
WASHINGTON The Supreme Court ruled Monday that Louisiana's tough restriction on abortion violates the Constitution, a surprising victory for abortion rights advocates from an increasingly conservative court.
The 5-4 decision, in which Chief Justice John Roberts joined with the court's four more liberal justices, struck down a law passed by Louisiana's legislature in 2014 that required any doctor offering abortion services to have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles. Its enforcement had been blocked by a protracted legal battle.
(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...
The same people controlling BLM, Russia gate, coronavirus shutdowns, etc?
How was Epstein able to run his gig as long as he did in the internet age?
Yes, he’s using his LOSS in that case as an excuse for “stare decisis” in which he must now back the side that won in that earlier case. It’s asinine logic. The left doesn’t give 2 sh-ts about stare decisis... they can lose repeatedly on everything (sodomy, gay marriage, gun control, campaign finance) yet they stick to their guns and keep plugging away and they win.
Roberts is a bum and a chump and I truly think he’s been blackmailed.
So abortion is safe when Drs dont have admitting privileges when some dentist do. Such a farce. This is the same as woman in back alley, just better looking facility and guy who calls himself a docto
I wish FReepers who sould know what Treason is and isn't would look up the definition before posting utter nonsense.
Main BodyMortgager Care conspirator.
Part of the Yoke and Shackle Clan.
Contact tracing has started by cashless transaction
yes. I never believed he was being blackmailed, anyhow. No one could show what he was being blackmailed for.
But he’s Bushie’s appointee, so there we go.
I wish Bader would retire but wish her no ill, I wish Roberts would just drop dead, struck down by the God he claims to believe in.
LOL. To paraphrase another FReeper: I’d rather have a Democrat in front of me than a Republican behind me.
It was not a restrictive abortion law. It was a law designed to save the women’s lives.
Pregnant women’s lives don’t matter with the Supreme Court. Only promoting baby killing matters with the Court.
This is the same as woman in back alley,
**********************************************************************************
Exactly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.