This is bull####!
Posted on 02/06/2020 6:26:15 PM PST by Trump20162020
Pete Buttigieg: 564 (26.2%)
Bernie Sanders: 562 (26.1%)
Elizabeth Warren: 387 (18.0%)
Joe Biden: 341 (15.8%)
Amy Klobuchar: 264 (12.3%)
Andrew Yang: 22 (1.0%)
Tom Steyer: 7 (0.3%)
Michael Bloomberg: 0 (0.0%)
Tulsi Gabbard: 0 (0.0%)
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Gee...
It only took most of THE WEEK ... to count.
Democrats can f*** up a wet dream.
What a clown-car show.
Mayor Cheat was one of those those who paid for the app. Of course he knew he’d squeak out a “W”.
Thank you!
Nobody is publishing those numbers!
so, do these totals include the revisions necessary to fix the hundreds of errors NYT found?
Do they have any straight candidates in multiple photo kissing embraces? Even Al and Tipper gave it a rest in public after a while!
“As some might say AYFKM? They needed an app to count 2,147 votes? Great Caeser’s Ghost! HOW INCOMPETENT CAN PEOPLE GET?
“
those 2,147 county assembly delegates are NOT the count in question, but are the RESULT of tabulating nearly 200,000 votes in almost 1,700 cacus precincts,and involve complex tabulations that involve shifts from “first choices” to “final choices” in each of those caucus precincts, and it’s all of those tabulations that are in question due to precinct-level tabulation errors and precinct-level reporting to Dem headquarters in Iowa ...
“Is it in yet?”
LOL! Pretty much says it all, doesn't it?
I fully expect Breadline Bernie to win New Hampshire. Then what? ;-)
What are odds that that was the order of the polling they withheld, but not the same percentages?
With the “failure” of the App, I have a theory. The app was designed to show a “successful” report or the results to the precinct captain. At the end if the night, the app was supposed to take the total number of votes received and add/subtract from various candidates as necessary to give Pete the “win” but make it seem plausible.
Some bad coding later and it went to hell, causing this mess.
Landslide 2020. No wonder Pelosi is totally losing her mind.
The democrat primary is going to turn into a huge mess when they start with the Southern states as neither Pete nor Bernie will do well. Warren is not likely to make inroads there, but it is slim pickings.
Biden will likely do much better on the Southern Wall increasing the chances of a brokered convention. Furthermore, many of the national delegates are lukewarm to the current field except for Biden.
I have no clue at this point what will happen in this process other than chaos.
Geez, to watch these two weenies and their campaign ads here in California, you would think they were leading the pack. Not sure what's worse, Steyer the hedge fund hack referring to Mr. Trump as "the criminal in the White House" or Mini-Mike telling us how he intends to bring back Obamacare on his first day in office, with 0blamer singing his praises.
What a couple of putzes!
If you believe those results are legitimate, you’re dumber than a Millennial Leftist.
If you use the latest PravdaNews to look for the Iowa Caucus results, it will show Buttigieg leading slightly over Sanders, like this...
SDE's
564 26.2% Buttigieg
562 26.1% Sanders
387 18.0% Warren
341 15.8% Biden
264 12.3% Klobuchar
Reference: www.nytimes.com/.../results-iowa-caucus.html
The DNC refuses to list the "Popular Vote" any longer, because Bernie was getting too much traction from that data. So they spent days recalculating how to come up with some OTHER statistic that would favor MayorCheat and Biden. The new (and ONLY) "result" they flaunt now is SDE's, (state delegates) which they jiggered to make it favor their "good guys"
But ALL the raw data from ALL precincts (100% reporting) is available here...
results.thecaucuses.org
(you'd better save that page quickly, because the DNC will hide it soon)
In a half-dozen precincts, I checked that table versus what had originally been reported on social media, and it looks legit. If you select ALL the raw data, from all the precincts and crunch just the Final votes (the popular vote), you will get this...
Popular-Vote
45826 26.6% Sanders
43195 25.0% Buttigieg
34771 20.2% Warren
23691 13.7% Biden
21181 12.3% Klobuchar
Sanders has beaten MayorCheat by 2631 votes in Iowa, which is 1.6 percentage points, and outside the margin of error for automatic recounts in normal elections
Boy that’s great information. Thanks
That’s possible. They did so before.
I watched butt pete tonight on Late night for the first time by accident...he really does look like Howdy Doody! .....even without that factor he looks like a kid. I don’t understand Iowans falling for this guy but then Dems are so screwed up now their decision making is of the map.
Have the Broward county ballots been found yet?
Pete Buttigieg: 564 (26.2%) Bernie Sanders: 562 (26.1%) Elizabeth Warren: 387 (18.0%) Joe Biden: 3 41 (15.8%) Amy Klobuchar: 264 (12.3%) Andrew Yang: 22 (1.0%) Tom Steyer: 7 (0.3%) Michael Bloomberg: 0 (0.0%) Tulsi Gabbard: 0 ( 0.0%)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.