Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EXCLUSIVE: Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 86, leans on U.S. Marshall after leaving NYC hospital...
daily mail ^ | 8/23/2019 | CHEYENNE ROUNDTREE FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

Posted on 08/23/2019 10:28:34 AM PDT by RummyChick

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was seen leaning on a U.S. Marshall after leaving a New York City hospital for tests, DailyMail.com exclusive photos show.

The 86-year-old's hand was held by the Marshall as she walked up the stairs into a private residence on the Upper East Side after her appointment at the Howard Laboratory at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Hospital on Thursday.

Ginsburg is a three-time cancer survivor, beating colon cancer in 1999, pancreatic cancer in 2009 and, most recently, lung cancer in 2018.

Ginsburg is the oldest sitting U.S. Supreme Court Justice and said it is her 'dream' to be on the Supreme Court for as long as former Justice John Paul Stevens, who served for 35 years. Ginsburg has served for 26 years so far.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chat; ginsburg; rbg; rbghealth; rbgmedicaltreatment; rbgpancreaticcancer; rbgradiationtherapy; ruthbaderginsburg; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: RummyChick
...said it is her 'dream' to be on the Supreme Court for as long as former Justice John Paul Stevens, who served for 35 years.

Yea, because THAT is what is important. Not sitting on the bench as long as you are physically/mentally competent to adhering to strict interpretation of the constitution.....

no further comment..

41 posted on 08/23/2019 10:44:20 AM PDT by Envisioning (Carry safe, always carry, everyday, everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Another reason why Trump must Win Biggly Yugely in 2019!


42 posted on 08/23/2019 10:45:47 AM PDT by Harpotoo (Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

tick tock . . .


43 posted on 08/23/2019 10:45:59 AM PDT by MrNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
I'm not buying that it was RBG's "dream" to be on the Supreme Court for 35 years. It was more likely her dream to be replaced by the first woman president. That's why she held off retirement during the Obama years. She thought there was NO WAY Hillary was going to lose this.

Conservatives don't realize the bullet we dodged. Had Hillary won, she would have had two Supreme Court picks right off the bat. The Scalia seat AND the Ginsberg seat. Assuming that Kennedy would have retired when he did, Hillary would have had THREE SC picks already.

44 posted on 08/23/2019 10:46:02 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Nice! Stoled yours!


45 posted on 08/23/2019 10:46:30 AM PDT by KitJ (Shall not be infringed...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Soon, our tax dollars will be used to clean up her piss and vomit on the supreme court floor, if it hasn’t already.


46 posted on 08/23/2019 10:47:21 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

Week-end at Ruthies.


47 posted on 08/23/2019 10:48:35 AM PDT by sleepwalker (The future is so bright, I gotta wear shades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick


48 posted on 08/23/2019 10:49:53 AM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

What??? You couldn’t afford a US Marshall??


49 posted on 08/23/2019 10:50:06 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

https://www.allanfavish.com/index.php/affirmative-actionracial-preferences/88-ginsburg-quota-queen

After her nomination in 1993 by Clinton, but before her confirmation hearings, I had this article published in the Los Angeles Daily Journal. Not a single Senator raised this issue during her confirmation.

Ginsburg: Quota Queen

Written by Allan J. Favish

Supreme Court nominee Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg supported a racial quota plan that allowed for the possible promotion of less qualified individuals over more qualified individuals, when the less qualified individuals were black and the more qualified individuals were white.

While sitting as a judge on the United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, Ginsburg was one of three judges who decided the appeal in the case of McKenzie v. Sawyer, 684 F.2d 62 (1982).

The appellate opinion sets forth the facts. The case arose when black employees of the Offset Press Section (OPS) of the U.S. Government Printing Office brought a class action under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 alleging they were victims of racial discrimination and that they had been denied promotion opportunities to which they were otherwise entitled.

At the time of the lawsuit, OPS employed five categories of workers relevant to the suit. Supervisors included foremen, assistant foremen, and group chiefs. Journeymen included qualified craft workers in apprenticeable trades who were responsible for operating most of the machinery in OPS. Craft uprates operated some of the more complicated machines such as the two-color or the web press and sometimes performed supervisory duties. Offset press assistants were participants in a training program for journeyman positions, eligible for promotion to journeyman vacancies after successful completion of the training program. Finally, printing plant workers were unskilled helpers who performed such tasks as loading and cleaning.

The district court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and ordered relief.

The relief ordered by the district court included the following promotion plan. For each uprate or supervisory vacancy, OPS was to create a five-member selection panel, with at least three members of each panel being black. For each vacancy, the panel was to select a group of “best qualified” employees, drawn from employees at the next lowest level. Selection was to be based on validated, job-related performance standards.

From the “best qualified” group, the panel was then to select five applicants, based on an evaluation and selection guide. The names and records of the five were then to be forwarded to the superintendent of OPS, who was allowed to select any one of the five to fill the vacancy. There was no requirement that the superintendent choose the best qualified individual.

Additionally, OPS also was required to promote black individuals so as to have a specific percentage of specified positions filled by blacks within four years. For uprate, group chief, and assistant foreman positions, 60% of the employees would have to be black. For foreman positions, 50% of the employees would have to be black.

Ginsburg did not write the opinion, but she concurred with the appellate court’s affirmation of this racial quota plan.

Given the failure of the district court to require that the OPS superintendent choose the best qualified individual from among the five finalists for each vacancy, and the court’s requirement that 50-60% of the positions be filled by blacks, it is clear that both the district and appellate courts condoned the possible promotion of less qualified individuals because they were black over more qualified individuals who happened to be white.

Of course, we cannot assess the qualifications of those who were actually promoted. It is possible that each vacancy was filled by the best qualified candidate and the 50-60% racial quota was still met. It is also possible that the best qualified candidate for each vacancy was always black and that when the 50-60% quota was met, the superintendent unjustly and illegally discriminated against black individuals and chose less qualified individuals because they were white.

Nevertheless, the important point is that the 50-60% quota put pressure on the superintendent to promote a black individual even if that person was less qualified than another person who happened to be white. If the best qualified candidate among the five competing for a promotion happened to be white, it was okay with the district and appellate courts if the superintendent promoted a less qualified individual who was black in order to meet the 50-60% quota.

There should not have been any pressure to promote a less qualified individual who happened to be black or a less qualified individual who happened to be white. There only should have been pressure to promote the best qualified individuals without regard for their race.

If the district and appellate court’s primary goal was to have the best qualified person promoted to fill each vacancy, then the OPS superintendent would have been ordered to select the best qualified candidate from among the five finalists and there would not have been a requirement that 50-60% of the positions had to be filled by blacks within four years.

The district court’s order created the following situation. Given the Civil Rights Act’s prohibition against racial discrimination, it would have been illegal for the OPS superintendent to select on the basis of race, a less qualified individual who was white over a more qualified individual who was black. However, the district court made it mandatory for the superintendent to select a less qualified individual who was black over a more qualified individual who was white if that’s what it took to meet the quota.

The intent of those who enacted the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was to encourage hiring and promotion of the best qualified individuals without regard to race. They shared Martin Luther King’s belief that a person should be judged by the content of one’s character, not by the color of one’s skin.

By her conduct, Ginsburg joined a long list of bureaucrats and judges who have continued to view people as members of racial groups first, and as individuals second. Ginsburg’s perversion of the Civil Rights Act has helped keep King’s dream from becoming reality.

Los Angeles Daily Journal, July 13, 1993, p. 6. The Los Angeles Daily Journal is the city’s primary newspaper for the legal community.


50 posted on 08/23/2019 10:50:15 AM PDT by AJFavish (www.allanfavish.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Too soon?

Too late. She died four years ago but kept on going so Hillary could name her replacement.

She's also starring in the new AMC/Court TV crossover series: The Judging Dead.

51 posted on 08/23/2019 10:52:27 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Who's the leader of the club that feeds on dead babies? M-O-L... O-C-H... M-O-U-S-E.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: \/\/ayne

LOLOL way to go to link my two threads together.


52 posted on 08/23/2019 10:52:45 AM PDT by RummyChick ("Pills, money .. this city is wicked. Your best friend will kill you here." Smoove about Baltimore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: alternatives?

She needs the UppaWalker.


53 posted on 08/23/2019 10:55:08 AM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings f)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Nope, she’s dead inside- as we have all long suspected.

CC


54 posted on 08/23/2019 10:55:09 AM PDT by Celtic Conservative (My cats are more amusing than 200 channels worth of TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

I like Ruth’s backpack. Is it a Barbie, or My Little Pony?


55 posted on 08/23/2019 10:55:12 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob ("Other People's Money" = The life blood of Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

The liberal media will still call her a warrior and boast about her workout routine - even though it doesn’t exist anymore.


56 posted on 08/23/2019 10:55:12 AM PDT by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Just getting ready for her vigorous morning workout . . .


57 posted on 08/23/2019 10:57:03 AM PDT by Charlemagne on the Fox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

if he doesn’t pay back the money she lent him, it is her right to pressure him to pay up...

afterall, she is the notorious RBG.

dope


58 posted on 08/23/2019 10:57:08 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

This is news?


59 posted on 08/23/2019 10:58:19 AM PDT by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
She’s been looking frail like this for many years

Before I reached your post, I was looking at the pic of her with the men helping her stand; and, I thought to myself, when was the last time you saw her stand up straight? It's been years. Why oh why can't she just retire? Yeah, yeah, I know, politics.

60 posted on 08/23/2019 10:59:15 AM PDT by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson