Posted on 07/24/2019 5:39:29 AM PDT by nikos1121
Need a master class on the Mueller report before Robert Mueller testifies before Congress? Join PBS NewsHour correspondent and producer William Brangham, senior broadcast producer Mike Melia and digital politics editor and senior writer Daniel Bush on July 24 as they answer questions and walk viewers through the Russia investigation and Mueller's findings. The livestream kicks off at 7:40 a.m. EDT with a breakdown of the major findings and moments from Mueller's report. Between deep dives on parts of the report, your hosts will answer select questions from the live chat and social media.
To ask a question, use our live chat window to the right or tweet us @NewsHour.
Stay tuned for PBS NewsHour’s ongoing coverage of Mueller's testimony, which begins at 8:30 a.m. in a House Judiciary Committee hearing, and continues at noon with a House Intelligence committee hearing.
There is only one acceptable answer, and that is if there is an ongoing CRIMINAL investigation into the Clintons.
Yielding to Nunes. Good. Get ‘em Devin.
Two words for this pathetic display by Mueller: TOTAL TRAINWRECK!
The reason Mueller didn't investigate Clinton, is hopefully because she is the subject of a criminal investigation. It would be the only plausible and acceptable answer.
Radical Left-wing Twitter is all in for the Democrats.
Celebrating Victories for the Trump indictments by that horrid Representative Ted Leui, (sp) CA, and Mueller himself!
It’s clear that he’s refusing to answer any questions that ask him to back up statements he made in the report.
First time I have ever heard that! I always thought & was taught that impeachment was solely in the hands of the Congress. House delivers voted on bill, Senate holds trial. No place for USSC other then CJ presides over trial.
What Dershowitz was alluding to is the equivalent of a motion to dismiss a lawsuit for failure to state a claim upon which the court can grant relief. In other words, Roberts as the presiding justice, can dismiss the articles of impeachment if, after accepting the allegations as true, they fail to allege "high crimes and misdemeanor" within the meaning of the constitution.
Nunes asking a bunch of questions Mueller won’t answer instead of just hammering away at his bias.
He was lucid for about the first 20 minutes. He had some sort of boost over the lunch hour...
Mueller running out of gas. He just might end up face down on that table.
However Dershowitz said something intriguing. He said that the USSC could weigh in and block the delivery of the bill of impeachment - declare it unconstitutional!. If it determined that there were no “high crimes & misdemeanors” broken in the bill.
First time I have ever heard that! I always thought & was taught that impeachment was solely in the hands of the Congress. House delivers voted on bill, Senate holds trial. No place for USSC other then CJ presides over trial.
What Dershowitz was alluding to is the equivalent of a motion to dismiss a lawsuit for failure to state a claim upon which the court can grant relief. In other words, Roberts as the presiding justice, can dismiss the articles of impeachment if, after accepting the allegations as true, they fail to allege “high crimes and misdemeanor” within the meaning of the constitution.
I believe Mueller has signs of early Alzheimers.
One IS in his purview and the other not ‘cuz....reasons??
—
He was asked this and refused to answer.
Thanks for clarifying!
Nunes is unimpressive. comes across like an ass kisser
He couldn’t come up with word ‘conspiracy’
I believe Mueller has signs of early Alzheimers.
There was a very long and intense article in Forbes describing the extreme detail of the examination of Trump company dealings in Russia to establish a new Moscow hotel. The efforts went on all during the time when they were trying to get him. All or most of the info in the article was extracted from the Mueller report. They throughly investigated the Trump business dealings with the Russians. There apparently was actual fire but not the criminal kind.
There are lots of names and dates and places. In the end, Cohen I believe said the reason it eventually fell through was because Donald Trump was elected President.
Cohen was also quoted as saying there was no ploitical collusion to influence the election but there was a lot of collusion to make money..... or words to that effect.
For reference, see the last issue of Forbes/Russia Trump Hotel
There has not been a single word about the extensive mueller reportes business investigation
Nunes is off today. He’s usually better than this. Not sure why.
He is still lucid enough to always say “correct” if the person asking is a Dem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.