It's been 30 days, Mr President. Whenever you're ready.
Posted on 06/03/2019 11:14:53 PM PDT by bitt
On Monday night Sean Hannity invited Judicial Watch founder and president Tom Fitton and investigative reporter Sara Carter on to discuss the double standards of the unethical Obama DOJ and FBI.
Towards the end of the segment Sean Hannity dropped a bomb on the deep state.
According to Sean Hannity and what he is hearing from his sources Inspector General Horowitz has turned over his report to Attorney General Bill Barr and the report may be released this week
see video
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
It's been 30 days, Mr President. Whenever you're ready.
There’s no “BOOM”, there’s nothing period unless there indictments and prison terms.
Until them it’s a big nothing.
Lots depends on the reaction to the report. Lat report had Strzok and Page texts in it. FBI Director Wray's reaction was "there is no evidence of bias." Same report, same contents, AG Barr says "appalling level of bias."
The rot runs deep and wide. Nothing in the government should be presumed honest. It is a complete and total FAIL.
Howdy from fly-over land. Personally I have no faith in Barr, just a bland cynical outlook. If and if indictments stem from this attempted deep state coup, it will be low level sacrificial lambs to appease the masses. The big names and majority of those involved will walk unscathed.
My understanding is that treason is a wartime offense, whereas sedition is a peacetime one.
Perhaps a constitutional scholar would view it differently, though.
I stopped reading right there
“Horowitz appointed by Obama, no indictments.”
Horowitz has no authority to indict. He only reports.
I wish everyone would just calm down. It is what it is and we may have indictments from Barr or not. But, if nothing else there will be public exposure of the rats and that may have to be good enough.
Interesting read here. Muller report a FRAUD
If it is released then no charges can be expected. They wouldn’t release info they were going to use in a prosecution....
In some respects I don’t mind Hannity, but find him unlistenable because he talks in massive run-on sentences. He starts speaking on one thing and then, with barely a breath in between, ping pongs from one semi-related and unrelated topic after another until the original point he was trying to make is lost. He invites guests in his shows and then barely gives them time to speak while he rattles on and on in his run-on sentence style. I find that very frustrating.
He has great guest on his show and runs them over endlessly. It is not enough to have a 30 minute monologue to start every show - you bring in someone with actual (and often new) information and don’t let them talk. It is very hard to watch and follow.
May be not a good idea to “shoot for the moon” (treason). Better to get an easier “conviction” on something else like obstruction or destroying evidence, or whatever charges they can make stick.
Hannity's a cheerleader. I never watch him because it's always a rehash of what Rush has said, and Hannity does it much less effectively. He's a waste of time and is a terrible interviewer. He loves hearing his voice too much.
Barr has massive power...
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
imo, to not go for max charges & max penalties, would make the prosecution look like & be defended as political harassment
Bookmark
Bookmark
“the Interview”
yup. If that is the way it goes, Comey, Mueller, etc are toast. Then we move on to Susan Rice, ValJar and Brennan , etc.
Well, iffin’ ya axe me, that WAS the way it went.
Drop 2776
Booms are usually pops.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.