Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Robert Mueller — “If We Had Confidence President Did Not Commit a Crime We Would Have Said So”
GP ^ | May 29,2019 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 05/29/2019 8:30:10 AM PDT by Hojczyk

“If we had confidence the president DID NOT commit a crime we would have said so. We did not however make a determination if the president did commit a crime.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dueprocess; ipeedalittle; jamescomey; lisapage; mueller; muellerpresser; muellerreport; peterstrzok; presumption; robertmueller; trumprussia; trusttheplan; whaaat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-239 next last
To: null and void

Good line


41 posted on 05/29/2019 8:37:56 AM PDT by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
If We Had Confidence President Did Not Commit a Crime We Would Have Said So”

If We Had any evidence at all the President Did Commit a Crime We Would Have leaked it and I would be taking questions instead of running for cover.
42 posted on 05/29/2019 8:38:10 AM PDT by Kid Shelleen (Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Some people are getting very scared. Nothing about this is normal.

It is getting weird.

I'm hoping that with this latest from Mueller, the declassified documents will show up soon.

43 posted on 05/29/2019 8:38:19 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

It wasn’t his job to prove President Trump didn’t obstruct anything. It was his job to prove he did and Mulehead the pussy punted on that.


44 posted on 05/29/2019 8:38:40 AM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Trying to wrest offensive action and press attention away from Trump/Barr/Durham progress.


45 posted on 05/29/2019 8:38:43 AM PDT by griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Bull$hit! The fact is that you had no evidence to charge him, and it tells me you didn’t move ahead with obstruction, because you knew you’d never be able to prove it in a court of law. It’s just all smoke and mirrors.


46 posted on 05/29/2019 8:38:55 AM PDT by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Ha! The cart before the horse. It was his job to find criminal conduct. Or not. Saying he couldn’t find any chargeable conduct 🤔after two excruciating years of trying — says it all!!! No amount of prevarication or obfuscation now can produce any chargeable evidence of any wrongdoing. He’s exonerated pdjt completely and now he’s only making an ass of himself
47 posted on 05/29/2019 8:38:56 AM PDT by faithhopecharity ( “Politicians are not born; they are excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Maybe now people will realize what we are really up against.

Just kidding. “Trust the plan”


48 posted on 05/29/2019 8:39:14 AM PDT by Stravinsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

High time to DECLASSIFY ALL DOCUMENTS!!!

EXPOSE THE REAL TRUTHS!!

I just pray that President Trump’s trust in AG Bill Barr has not been misplaced.
Remember how Barr and Mule Face have been friends for many, many years.
Hoping and praying that PDJT won’t be burned/betrayed by a second AG.

DRAIN THE SWAMP NOW!!!


49 posted on 05/29/2019 8:39:44 AM PDT by edie1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Not for nothing, but those statements seem to cancel each other out.

Yep, nothing new. He has no evidence to support obstruction and even if he did it would be unconstitutional to prosecute - It OVER.

50 posted on 05/29/2019 8:40:09 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

“Democrats will impeach him after this..”

No they won’t. They will continue doing just what they’ve been doing.


51 posted on 05/29/2019 8:40:16 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (The internet has driven the world mad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

I know we are all tired of arguing this stupid point and Muller did nothing but muddy the waters.
It’s time to declassify some information right now and change the headlines.


52 posted on 05/29/2019 8:40:27 AM PDT by JerseyDvl ("If you're going through hell, keep going.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

Got to love the hubris of Mueller dictating to Congress he won’t testify after a $35 million investigation.


53 posted on 05/29/2019 8:40:36 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Democrats will need to start impeachment hearings. This way, they can characterize any investigation of the Deep State as “obstruction of justice”.


54 posted on 05/29/2019 8:40:38 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

The swamp has spoken..


55 posted on 05/29/2019 8:40:39 AM PDT by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
I'm still trying to figure out what the hell I just listened to. 🤔

My best guess at this point: Mueller tried to provide his own "summary" to contrast to Barr's summary. (Which, BTW, Mueller participated in putting together.)

56 posted on 05/29/2019 8:40:40 AM PDT by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edie1960

A slimy rat to the very end..


57 posted on 05/29/2019 8:41:01 AM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

That’s great and all Bob, but your job is not to exonerate. Any person is presumed innocent. The state must prove otherwise to convict. You found no such evidence.

But of course you went to law school and you know that as well as I. You’re just trying to weasel hoping nobody notices your attempt to shift the burden from the state to prove guilt to Donald Trump to prove innocence. Well, we noticed. Your little ploy has failed.


58 posted on 05/29/2019 8:41:14 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
“If we had confidence the president DID NOT commit a crime we would have said so. We did not however make a determination if the president did commit a crime.”

So not saying he did and not saying he didn't. That gives ammunition to both sides.

59 posted on 05/29/2019 8:41:16 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

MUELLER IS A SNAKE!


60 posted on 05/29/2019 8:41:18 AM PDT by Stayfree (Liberalism is a mental disease caused by stupidity and elitism!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-239 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson