Skip to comments.
Robert Mueller — “If We Had Confidence President Did Not Commit a Crime We Would Have Said So”
GP ^
| May 29,2019
| Jim Hoft
Posted on 05/29/2019 8:30:10 AM PDT by Hojczyk
If we had confidence the president DID NOT commit a crime we would have said so. We did not however make a determination if the president did commit a crime.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dueprocess; ipeedalittle; jamescomey; lisapage; mueller; muellerpresser; muellerreport; peterstrzok; presumption; robertmueller; trumprussia; trusttheplan; whaaat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-239 next last
To: null and void
41
posted on
05/29/2019 8:37:56 AM PDT
by
genghis
To: Hojczyk
If We Had Confidence President Did Not Commit a Crime We Would Have Said So
If We Had any evidence at all the President Did Commit a Crime We Would Have leaked it and I would be taking questions instead of running for cover.
42
posted on
05/29/2019 8:38:10 AM PDT
by
Kid Shelleen
(Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
To: servo1969
Some people are getting very scared. Nothing about this is normal. It is getting weird.
I'm hoping that with this latest from Mueller, the declassified documents will show up soon.
43
posted on
05/29/2019 8:38:19 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
To: Hojczyk
It wasnt his job to prove President Trump didnt obstruct anything. It was his job to prove he did and Mulehead the pussy punted on that.
To: Hojczyk
Trying to wrest offensive action and press attention away from Trump/Barr/Durham progress.
45
posted on
05/29/2019 8:38:43 AM PDT
by
griffin
To: Hojczyk
Bull$hit! The fact is that you had no evidence to charge him, and it tells me you didn’t move ahead with obstruction, because you knew you’d never be able to prove it in a court of law. It’s just all smoke and mirrors.
46
posted on
05/29/2019 8:38:55 AM PDT
by
mass55th
("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne)
To: Hojczyk
Ha! The cart before the horse. It was his job to find criminal conduct. Or not. Saying he couldnt find any chargeable conduct 🤔after two excruciating years of trying says it all!!! No amount of prevarication or obfuscation now can produce any chargeable evidence of any wrongdoing. Hes exonerated pdjt completely and now hes only making an ass of himself
47
posted on
05/29/2019 8:38:56 AM PDT
by
faithhopecharity
( “Politicians are not born; they are excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
To: Hojczyk
Maybe now people will realize what we are really up against.
Just kidding. Trust the plan
To: Hojczyk
High time to DECLASSIFY ALL DOCUMENTS!!!
EXPOSE THE REAL TRUTHS!!
I just pray that President Trump’s trust in AG Bill Barr has not been misplaced.
Remember how Barr and Mule Face have been friends for many, many years.
Hoping and praying that PDJT won’t be burned/betrayed by a second AG.
DRAIN THE SWAMP NOW!!!
49
posted on
05/29/2019 8:39:44 AM PDT
by
edie1960
To: Sacajaweau
Not for nothing, but those statements seem to cancel each other out.Yep, nothing new. He has no evidence to support obstruction and even if he did it would be unconstitutional to prosecute - It OVER.
50
posted on
05/29/2019 8:40:09 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: Hojczyk
“Democrats will impeach him after this..”
No they won’t. They will continue doing just what they’ve been doing.
51
posted on
05/29/2019 8:40:16 AM PDT
by
SaxxonWoods
(The internet has driven the world mad.)
To: Hojczyk
I know we are all tired of arguing this stupid point and Muller did nothing but muddy the waters.
It’s time to declassify some information right now and change the headlines.
52
posted on
05/29/2019 8:40:27 AM PDT
by
JerseyDvl
("If you're going through hell, keep going.")
To: unixfox
Got to love the hubris of Mueller dictating to Congress he won’t testify after a $35 million investigation.
53
posted on
05/29/2019 8:40:36 AM PDT
by
lodi90
To: Hojczyk
Democrats will need to start impeachment hearings. This way, they can characterize any investigation of the Deep State as “obstruction of justice”.
54
posted on
05/29/2019 8:40:38 AM PDT
by
SauronOfMordor
(Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
To: Hojczyk
To: Hojczyk
I'm still trying to figure out what the hell I just listened to. 🤔
My best guess at this point: Mueller tried to provide his own "summary" to contrast to Barr's summary. (Which, BTW, Mueller participated in putting together.)
56
posted on
05/29/2019 8:40:40 AM PDT
by
NewJerseyJoe
(Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
To: edie1960
A slimy rat to the very end..
To: Hojczyk
Thats great and all Bob, but your job is not to exonerate. Any person is presumed innocent. The state must prove otherwise to convict. You found no such evidence.
But of course you went to law school and you know that as well as I. Youre just trying to weasel hoping nobody notices your attempt to shift the burden from the state to prove guilt to Donald Trump to prove innocence. Well, we noticed. Your little ploy has failed.
58
posted on
05/29/2019 8:41:14 AM PDT
by
FLT-bird
To: Hojczyk
If we had confidence the president DID NOT commit a crime we would have said so. We did not however make a determination if the president did commit a crime. So not saying he did and not saying he didn't. That gives ammunition to both sides.
To: Hojczyk
MUELLER IS A SNAKE!
60
posted on
05/29/2019 8:41:18 AM PDT
by
Stayfree
(Liberalism is a mental disease caused by stupidity and elitism!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-239 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson