Posted on 05/26/2019 6:26:43 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Secret FBI tapes that accuse Martin Luther King Jr of having extramarital affairs with '40 to 45 women' and even claim he 'looked on and laughed' as a pastor friend raped a parishioner, exist an author has claimed. The civil rights hero was also heard allegedly joking he was the founder of the 'International Association for the Advancement of P***y-Eaters'.
The shocking files could lead to a 'painful historical reckoning' for the man who is celebrated across the world for his campaign against racial injustice, according to one biographer. The FBI surveillance tapes detailing his indiscretions are being held in a vault at the U.S. National Archives and are not due for release until 2027. But David Garrow, a biographer of King who won a Pulitzer Prize for his 1987 book Bearing the Cross about the Baptist minister, has unearthed the FBI summaries of the various incidents.
In an article to be published in Standpoint, Garrow tells how the FBI planted transmitters in two lamps in hotel rooms booked by King in January 1964, according to The Sunday Times.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Guess what? If it looks, smells, walks, and quacks like a duck, it’s a Duck!
King’s director was Stanley David Levinson, a Communist Party USA member and KGB asset.
He was his attorney, fund-raiser, speech-writer, organizer, PR officer, treasurer and financier.
Levinson, known as the Assistant Chief, did ALL of the following for MLK:
1. He was his principal advisor and legal counsel
2. He conducted fund raisers for King and the SCLC
3. He researched, wrote and presented speech material for King
4. He scheduled and rejected public appearances for King
5. He was the Asst. Treasurer of the SCLC
6. He was financing the SCLC through the CPUSA
7. He hired other CPUSA members as organizers and secretaries for King
8. He directed what King was to say or and was not say in public
9. He both edited and wrote articles and sections of books that King presented as his own
Nearly all of King’s top advisors, speech writers, organizers, and personal assistants, were specifically recruited from within the ranks of the CPUSA, often by Levison himself.
Many of King’s loyal supporters were either Communist Party USA members or supporters at various times of their careers: Wyatt T. Walker, Ralph D. Abernathy who later defected from the Soviet KGB front, the World Peace Council, Stoney Cook (limited contacts), Rev. Willie Barrows and the Rev. Jesse Jackson.
Beyond the most involved KGB asset- Stanley Levison, there’s also Jack O’Dell, aka Jack Vesey, aka Hunter Pitts O’Dell
Analogies pertaining to George Lucas, Nixon, Jefferson, Pete Butt... are all moot here. Same for slippery-slope, straw-man logic and false dichotomies.
The topic IS Mike King, Jr. aka Martin Luther King, Jr.
Sorry, that should be Horace Greeley, not Horace Greenley, but still, my point stands. If Abraham Lincoln and Richard Nixon can be considered anti-Communist despite either working with a Communist dictator under bad advice during the 1970s or having a very radical, near-Marxist like Greeley, I’m doubtful MLK could qualify, especially not after he wrote “Can a Christian be a Communist” or his friendship with Nixon. At worst, he’s a useful idiot to Communists.
Yeah, and if he smelled, walked, and quacked like a duck, he would not have allied himself and spoke fondly of Richard Nixon, and if anything gone out of his way to condemn Nixon for jailing Alger Hiss, and he most certainly would not have wrote “Can a Christian be a Communist”, and if anything pull the same stuff Vladimir Putin, Angela Merkel, Pope Francis, and that Red Priest guy during the Cold War. I know I wouldn’t have in his shoes if I were a full-fledged Communist, even a stealth one, and if anything, regarding the latter bit, I’d shoot anyone who DARED claim they were irreconcilable precisely because it destroys any propaganda objectives.
Besides, by that exact same logic of if it looks, smells, and quacks like a duck, Richard Nixon’s a communist as is Abraham Lincoln precisely because they’ve cozied up with Mao Zedong and even Karl Marx himself by giving correspondences as well as his association with Horace Greeley, who is a Marxist in all but name, even when Nixon was responsible for sending Alger Hiss to jail.
Returning to the topic of this thread- MLK
MLK’s staff-
African American, Bayard Rustin is a former organizer for the Young Communist League. He spent 60 days in a California jail on a 1953 conviction for performing lewd homosexual acts in public. He also served 28 months in prison later. He was King’s secretary and advisor from 1956 to 1960. During this period Rustin attended the National Convention of the Communist Party in 1957 as an “honored observer.” King called him a “a brilliant, efficient, and dedicated organizer.” It was Rustin who introduced King to a Soviet spy named Stanley D. Levison.
Levison was a NY Lawyer and VP of the N.Y. Council of the American Jewish Congress. Levison’s job was to launder the $1million subsidy Soviet Russia gave to finance the U.S. Communist Party. Levison proved important financial, organizational and public relations services for King.
The money which the Soviet Union funneled to Levison came from Isidore G. Needleman. He was a KGB secret police agent who fronted as an officer of AMTORG, the trading company in New York City which buys U.S. goods for shipment to Russia. There are so many Jews in the Communist Party the FBI hired two Jewish brothers, Morris Childs and Jack Childs as spies planned inside the Communist Party. For 30 years, Morris Childs was formerly a member of the National Committee of the Communist party and once served as editor of the Daily Worker. Childs reported that after the death of William Weiner, who was treasurer of the Communist Party, it was Stanley Levison who took over this vital post.
quack-quack
The only thing that proves is that MLK is a dupe and a useful idiot. It does NOT prove he is a Communist, closeted or otherwise. Even Harry Truman and Eisenhower interacted with Communists, yet they’re not Communists, and the latter’s a conservative.
And I’m pretty sure a closeted communist/communist agent would NOT even DARE try to publish an essay explicitly condemning Communism for its adherence to atheism and even state outright that it and Christianity are irreconcilable. If anything, that’s a good way for a Communist agent to be killed by his party heads for destroying any propaganda value. You still haven’t addressed THAT essay, which conflicts with the idea that he is a communist.
African Americans in the deep south prior to the late 60s were not democrats. It would be like joining the Klan.
Yeah, agreed. Probably the closest to a black democrat at the time was WEB Du Bois, and that guy is a Communist and closer to a member of the Socialist party than a Democrat. Now, WEB Du Bois, unlike MLK, actually IS confirmed to be a Soviet agent, openly rooting for the Soviets every single dang time.
King archives reveal him with the couple - Carl and Ann Branden - Communist Party activists and ring-leaders in the SCEF out of Louisville, KY. Carl was convicted of criminal sedition in 1954, sentenced to 15 years in prison. These charming comrades purchased a home for blacks in a white neighborhood to incite racial violence and then blew it up garner sympathy and raise money. Not so peaceful, these friends of King.
King archives picture him seated at a Communist training school surrounded by his Communist comrades: Sept. 2, 1957 - King attending the Highlander Folk School which the Communist Party operated at Monteagle, Tennessee.
Here are his fellow comrades identified sitting beside him: Abner Berry, member of the Central Committee of the Communist Party and writer for the “Daily Worker,:. Aubrey Williams, Communist Party agent and president of the Southern Conference Educational Fund (SCEF) a red front organizing blacks in Southern states. No. 4, Miles Horton, head of the Highlander Folk School King was listed on the schools’ letterhead as a “sponsor.”
The Highlander school was financed by the Julius Rosenwald Fund. At one time Rosenwald headed Sears Roebuck Co. He spent $22 million financing civil rights groups. His daughter Edith Stern continued to give money to the SCEF and Highlander Folk School after her father’s death. Her husband, Alfred Stern of New Orleans, fled to Russia just before he was to be arrested on spying for the Soviet Union and subversive anti-American activities.
“quack-quack”
Also, the original topic is tapes regarding MLK being involved in a rape, not whether or not he was a communist (which I still doubt, as much as I think he’s got far too many flaws as it is). In any case, given that he served as the inspiration for Aleida Scott King’s pro-life views and he was extremely pro-life or at the very least strongly anti-abortion in life, I find it extremely unlikely he would have supported rape, or laughed about it. Actually, if anything, if he loved rapes, he would have supported abortions as a way of “cleaning up evidence”. Besides, that would paint the FBI in a bad light as well and goes at odds with history regarding Hoover’s views on King (knowing how anti-King Hoover was, do you REALLY think he’d just sit on a potential goldmine to discredit MLK? He played a massive role in the McCarthy hearings trying and convicting Communists. I seriously doubt he’d just sit on something that would expose someone he didn’t like as a would-be rapist.).
You still haven’t addressed this essay he wrote which outright denounced communism and any chance of it infiltrating Christianity among his parish, which is tactical and strategic suicide for communist agitators: http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/can-a-christian-be-a-communist/ Until you actually address that essay, and explain how the author can be a communist and still write it, and in a satisfactory and convincing manner, do not repeat those statements.
For that matter, you still haven’t addressed Martin Luther King’s personal friendship with anti-Communist warrior Richard Nixon, which is also another conflicting evidence against his being a communist. Or even his support of second amendment rights of being pro-life (Communists support widescale abortions, and they certainly don’t support a citizen’s right to bear arms).
Well my dear, the rape and sordid sexual encounters are truly disgusting and plastered all over the web and are very distasteful and so enlightening as to King’s true character.
If King was not a ‘real’ Comrade, he is completely devoid of character as he knowingly and willingly accepted their education, strategical support, staffing support, financial support, and complete direction on how to conduct his Civil Rights cause. The only thing that CPUSA seemed not to be supporting or dictating was King’s nightly Orgies! (so far no Russian babes)
Anyway, King’s roots and organization are probably more significant to Conservatives.
The Communist Party USA Promoted King:
Black Communists were ordered to do all within their power to support King’s activities.
Julia Brown, was a Communist in Cleveland for nine years. “We were told to promote King, to unite Negroes and Whites behind him, and to turn him into a sort of national hero . We were to look to King as the leader in this struggle, the Communists said, because he was on our side. While in the party I learned that King attended a communist training school, that several of his aides were communists and that he received funds from Communists and took directions from them. He was one of their biggest heroes.”
Karl Prussian, an FBI counterspy inside the Communist Party swore before Congress: “At all of these (Communist Party) meetings Rev. Martin Luther King was always set forth as the individual to whom Communists should rally around. King has either been a member of, or willingly accepted support from over 60 Communist fronts. King accepted support from multiple communist fronts, individuals and organizations which espouse communist causes.”
The U. S. Congressional Record of March 30, 1965
“quack-quack”
We don’t know if the rape ever occurred. Sexual encounters, sure, we know about those unfortunately, but this is the first we’ve gotten about the rapes, as not even the FBI/CIA files for both MLK and JFK that were released a little while back covered the rape elements (and personally, based on how some posts indicated that there’s no audio posted, I have suspicions as to it being false. Don’t you think if they had the audio, they’d make sure to post it?). Besides, I’m pretty sure being against abortion is a surefire sign of moral character (since it essentially means he is against killing babies in the womb), and I’m pretty sure he would not condemn Communism for its atheist ideology in that paper and indicate that it and Christianity are irreconcilable if he truly was a communist. They don’t generally do that. I know Manning Johnson, a Communist agent who was single-handedly responsible for subverting clergy to Communism, most certainly didn’t, and neither did Vladimir Putin. And until you actually address that essay I linked a little while back that he wrote, and how he can be a communist and still make that statement, or heck, even be friends with Richard Nixon, whom the far-left utterly despised for busting Alger Hiss, you still aren’t making any convincing statements. Besides, by your logic, Horace Greeley’s open support of Karl Marx, his ties to the Republican party, and even Abraham Lincoln interacting with Marx via letters condemns Lincoln and the Republican Party as Marxists.
Are you Catholic?
Yep, and a pretty serious one as well. I don’t take the charge that someone who infiltrated the church, whether it be Catholic or Protestant, to promote Marxism lightly, so when I see someone indicate MLK is a Communist plant, I get irritated especially when I’ve seen evidence to point against him being an adherent to Communism (I can give a lot more evidence pinning WEB Du Bois or even Thomas Jefferson as apostates and Communists than I can MLK, evidence that’s actually consistent with how communist sympathizers generally operate).
And what did King say about Christianity?
At Crozer Theological Seminary he wrote: “An Autobiography of Religious Development,”
King details a religious experience, where he didn’t actually find Jesus since he emerged to deny the Bodily Resurrection, Virgin Birth, and Deity of Jesus Christ. Most believe that King was committed to the “Christian religion,” but he denies the tenets of the faith, particularly the N.T..
King asserted that the early Christians created a mythological story to account for the moral uniqueness of Jesus of Nazareth. He gave credit to the Virgin Birth as a deity developed due to Greek philosophical influence of Jesus being the highest, brightest and the best.
He basically scorned Christian Theological Fundamentalism. And since many of his writings are stolen from other’s texts, it is hard to decipher retroactively what this man really believed.
Besides, his conduct was morally bankrupt and in direct conflict with the Scripture and teachings he so earnestly professed to believe.
Others have critiqued his paper (assuming it’s his actual ideas), “The Sources of Fundamentalism and Liberalism Considered Historically and Psychologically,” and stated that King was beginning to identify himself with classical theological liberalism and rejecting the doctrines of fundamentalism.
And the man did praise theological liberalism as he also had no belief in Scriptural inerrancy or the Doctrine of the Fall and that’s in addition to the denial of divine Sonship, the virgin birth, and the resurrection. There is really not much left at this point.
It’s beginning to look like King recognized his talents as a speaker and recognized the pulpit would be his launch-pad by which he could gain a following and begin a career in social justice protest or civil rights.
So what do you think about Rome getting US taxpayers to fund Catholic charities to flood this nation with illegals?
I’m not fond of Pope Francis for doing that, and I didn’t make it any secret how much I hold him in contempt. I even explicitly indicated that he was a stealth Communist who is doing everything in his power to outright sabotage the church. So, yeah, I’m NOT fond of Francis forcing us taxpayers to allow for unrestrained illegal immigration.
Suspect all you want, it’s really kind of a minor or isolated issue given the rest of King’s ugly past. Do you really think that every woman that attended all of his orgies expected or wanted to perform whatevers as directed? The paid prostitutes would not care. I would venture that some of the church ladies or speech attendees were coerced as is documented in another transcript published in 2013....
Just as men should not be masquerading as Catholic Priests, they shouldn’t be masquerading as a Baptist Preacher.
The Baptist faith has certain distinguishing characteristics and you don’t just become a preacher. Doctrinally, King would be defined as a false prophet since he professed few if any tents of the Baptist faith and denied the fundamentals of the faith. As he wrote about his complete confusion about God, it seems like he was not accepting or believing his chosen field of study, but saw it as an opportunity for his agenda. So he used the church and it’s faithful flock. And he used their women (Shades of Joseph Smith.)
What kind of a “Christian” attends a seminary school only to steal other people’s works to fraudulently acquire a theological degree? What kind of person does this? ... a fraudster...a thief....a con-man
Did he ever truly really believe in God, or was the reality that he had a hidden agenda. Why was he unable to come up with his own original, genuine work and present that to earn a theological degree rather than through fraud and deception?
The first public sermon that King ever gave, in 1947 at the Ebenezer Baptist Church, was plagiarized almost in its entirety from a homily by Protestant clergyman Harry Emerson Fosdick. It was entitled, “Life is What You Make It.” And this one personally bugs me, because it was his chance to start a new life in the house of God and speak pleasingly to God’s ears.
MLK’s book “Stride Toward Freedom”, has been determined to have been plagiarized from multiple different separate sources. (Levinson included)
King plagiarized all of his papers at Boston University and Crozer Theological Seminary, and most extensively, his essay “The Place and Reason and Experience in Finding, his thesis “Contemporary Continental Theology”, his doctoral dissertation “A Comparison of the Conceptions of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Harry Nelson Wieman”, and various other documented works.
“King’s plagiarisms are easy to detect because their style rises above the level of his pedestrian student prose. In general, if the sentences are eloquent, witty, insightful, or pithy, or contain allusions, analogies, metaphors, or similes, it is safe to assume that the section has been purloined.” In one case, 20 out of a total of 24 paragraphs show “verbatim theft.”-— Wow, that’s 80%!!
https://www.amren.com/news/2018/01/martin-luther-king-jr-plagiarism/
So now we have a veteran and habitual plagiarist who is a deviant serial fornicator posing as a Baptist Preacher, and bought and paid for by CPUSA. And we have a holiday honoring his name, and statues and more streets than Washington, Lincoln, Adams, and Jefferson combined.
Your post is completely off topic and does not belong on this thread. Defending MLK by shredding TJ is absurd and pathetic.
Stop filling the thread with lengthy TJ stuff. Jefferson was not parading as a Baptist Preacher.
Nor was he screwing half the female congregation til the following Monday morning.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.