We don’t know if the rape ever occurred. Sexual encounters, sure, we know about those unfortunately, but this is the first we’ve gotten about the rapes, as not even the FBI/CIA files for both MLK and JFK that were released a little while back covered the rape elements (and personally, based on how some posts indicated that there’s no audio posted, I have suspicions as to it being false. Don’t you think if they had the audio, they’d make sure to post it?). Besides, I’m pretty sure being against abortion is a surefire sign of moral character (since it essentially means he is against killing babies in the womb), and I’m pretty sure he would not condemn Communism for its atheist ideology in that paper and indicate that it and Christianity are irreconcilable if he truly was a communist. They don’t generally do that. I know Manning Johnson, a Communist agent who was single-handedly responsible for subverting clergy to Communism, most certainly didn’t, and neither did Vladimir Putin. And until you actually address that essay I linked a little while back that he wrote, and how he can be a communist and still make that statement, or heck, even be friends with Richard Nixon, whom the far-left utterly despised for busting Alger Hiss, you still aren’t making any convincing statements. Besides, by your logic, Horace Greeley’s open support of Karl Marx, his ties to the Republican party, and even Abraham Lincoln interacting with Marx via letters condemns Lincoln and the Republican Party as Marxists.
Are you Catholic?
Suspect all you want, it’s really kind of a minor or isolated issue given the rest of King’s ugly past. Do you really think that every woman that attended all of his orgies expected or wanted to perform whatevers as directed? The paid prostitutes would not care. I would venture that some of the church ladies or speech attendees were coerced as is documented in another transcript published in 2013....
Just as men should not be masquerading as Catholic Priests, they shouldn’t be masquerading as a Baptist Preacher.
The Baptist faith has certain distinguishing characteristics and you don’t just become a preacher. Doctrinally, King would be defined as a false prophet since he professed few if any tents of the Baptist faith and denied the fundamentals of the faith. As he wrote about his complete confusion about God, it seems like he was not accepting or believing his chosen field of study, but saw it as an opportunity for his agenda. So he used the church and it’s faithful flock. And he used their women (Shades of Joseph Smith.)
What kind of a “Christian” attends a seminary school only to steal other people’s works to fraudulently acquire a theological degree? What kind of person does this? ... a fraudster...a thief....a con-man
Did he ever truly really believe in God, or was the reality that he had a hidden agenda. Why was he unable to come up with his own original, genuine work and present that to earn a theological degree rather than through fraud and deception?
The first public sermon that King ever gave, in 1947 at the Ebenezer Baptist Church, was plagiarized almost in its entirety from a homily by Protestant clergyman Harry Emerson Fosdick. It was entitled, “Life is What You Make It.” And this one personally bugs me, because it was his chance to start a new life in the house of God and speak pleasingly to God’s ears.
MLK’s book “Stride Toward Freedom”, has been determined to have been plagiarized from multiple different separate sources. (Levinson included)
King plagiarized all of his papers at Boston University and Crozer Theological Seminary, and most extensively, his essay “The Place and Reason and Experience in Finding, his thesis “Contemporary Continental Theology”, his doctoral dissertation “A Comparison of the Conceptions of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Harry Nelson Wieman”, and various other documented works.
“King’s plagiarisms are easy to detect because their style rises above the level of his pedestrian student prose. In general, if the sentences are eloquent, witty, insightful, or pithy, or contain allusions, analogies, metaphors, or similes, it is safe to assume that the section has been purloined.” In one case, 20 out of a total of 24 paragraphs show “verbatim theft.”-— Wow, that’s 80%!!
https://www.amren.com/news/2018/01/martin-luther-king-jr-plagiarism/
So now we have a veteran and habitual plagiarist who is a deviant serial fornicator posing as a Baptist Preacher, and bought and paid for by CPUSA. And we have a holiday honoring his name, and statues and more streets than Washington, Lincoln, Adams, and Jefferson combined.