Posted on 05/26/2019 6:26:43 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Secret FBI tapes that accuse Martin Luther King Jr of having extramarital affairs with '40 to 45 women' and even claim he 'looked on and laughed' as a pastor friend raped a parishioner, exist an author has claimed. The civil rights hero was also heard allegedly joking he was the founder of the 'International Association for the Advancement of P***y-Eaters'.
The shocking files could lead to a 'painful historical reckoning' for the man who is celebrated across the world for his campaign against racial injustice, according to one biographer. The FBI surveillance tapes detailing his indiscretions are being held in a vault at the U.S. National Archives and are not due for release until 2027. But David Garrow, a biographer of King who won a Pulitzer Prize for his 1987 book Bearing the Cross about the Baptist minister, has unearthed the FBI summaries of the various incidents.
In an article to be published in Standpoint, Garrow tells how the FBI planted transmitters in two lamps in hotel rooms booked by King in January 1964, according to The Sunday Times.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
As for MLK and his “content of character” speech; his assassination allowed the Left and the MSM to bury the man, and rewrite his narrative by creating a ‘martyred saint’ of mythological proportions, who has been sanitized and glorified beyond recognition, and then designated untouchable and beyond reproach.. All his Communist connections; massive plagiarisms; blatant blasphemy (”I’m F****** for God!”), woman beating, and all the deviancy and depravity he displayed while on the road, and away from his wife, needed to be locked away from public view, because as his widow said, “...its release would destroy his reputation!”. It is because of the content of HIS character, that he is the only person in which the MSM and Hollywood will not allow to be judged by the “content of his character”.
I would say that he repented and grew out of that behavior. He was also much more discriminate in his choices and was highly selective, narrowing the dating pool.
During these times, he was not a duplicitous tool, preaching morality to all others, like MLK, in the name of God. He was a civilian businessman, not a leader.
Nor were the good people of NY or Arkansas paying his salary like Slick’s as he’s preoccupied soliciting women in the Governor’s mansion, demanding to be serviced. Nor was he using the state Highway Patrol to solicit women for him to bang in the back of the limo, the bushes, or where ever else he could, like trailer-trash. Rest assured there are more women that have never stepped forward.
Nor has the US taxpayer been stuck with a President soliciting sex on the grounds of the White House. Kennedy deflowered girls in the WH pool and used his marital bed for his escapades which is all so sordid considering his lovely wife and young children.
Slick stuck to disgracing the Oval Office, as far as we know. And he engaged in acts while discussing international and security issues by phone. I’m guessing those conversations were above Ms. Lewinsky security clearance pay-grade. Thank goodness Slick was not into Russian women. LOL.
Our POTUS is not in the same class as these other fallen leaders. While no one condones PDJT’s mistakes, he sure has taken amazing care of his entire extended family and has produced some pretty wonderful children.
LOL You don’t even know his name. You’re a real expert.
LOL!! You sound like a talking head from CNN or MSNBC :)
LOL indeed. You still refuse to state your “Need to Know”?
History relies on truth. It’s that simple.
Still not an answer. How would YOU Jon Preston be using this information?
This all sounds fairly specific.
JFK FILE: FBI MONITORED MARTIN LUTHER KING’S ‘ABNORMAL’ SEX LIFE OF ORGIES, HOOKERS AND JOAN BAEZ
BY TOM PORTER ON 11/4/17
The Trump administration released an FBI document containing allegations about the sexual misconduct of Martin Luther King as part of its declassification of information relating to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
The 1968 document alleges financial improprieties by King’s civil rights organization, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, attempts to tie King to communist organizations and details a series of claims about King’s multiple alleged affairs.
It is not clear if any of the information in the dossier was verified. It makes no mention of JFK, and the FBI has not disclosed why it was held as part of a cache of documents relating to the Kennedy assassination.
Former FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover’s antipathy to King is well documented, and he went to extreme lengths, including authorising breaking into and bugging King’s home and offices, to destroy his reputation. The zeal of the FBI’s campaign against King has been outlined in tens of thousands of declassified FBI memos from the 1960s, and Congressional hearings on the FBI’s harrassment of King in the 1970s.
The declassified file is not the first time FBI information about King’s infidelity has been made public. The wiretaps that recorded information about King’s affairs—which the FBI tried to use against King—first emerged via congressional hearings in the 1970s.
Trump has ordered the National Archive to release all documents relating to the assassination, with the FBI file one of 646 documents from the Kennedy investigation released Friday.
The 20-page file profiles King when he was engaged in his historic campaign for civil rights, and is dated three weeks before his April 4, 1968 assassination.
“The course King chooses to follow at this critical time could have momentous impact on the future of race relations in the United States,” the document’s introduction reads. “And for that reason this paper has been prepared to give some insight into the nature of the man himself as well as the nature of his views, goals, objectives, tactics and the reasons therefor.”
A section of the document entitled “King’s Personal Conduct” contains a series of claims about King’s extramarital affairs, including a relationship with folk singer Joan Baez.
The document describes the alleged sex acts King engaged in as “unnatural” and “abnormal,” and details an orgy that took place during workshops King held in Miami, Florida, in February 1968 with funds from the Ford Foundation to train black ministers in leadership.
“Several Negro and white prostitutes were brought in from the Miami area. An all night-sex orgy was held with these prostitutes and some of the delegates in attendance.”
“One room had a large table in it which was filled with whiskey. The two Negro prostitutes were paid $50.00 to put on a sex show for the entertainment of the guests. A variety of sex acts deviating from the normal were observed.”
It goes on to label the African-American civil rights organization King led as a “tax dodge” and describes the alleged communist ties of King’s associates.
The document was authored while Hoover was director of the FBI. Then Attorney Geberal Robert F. Kennedy had authorized phone tapping surveillance of King as part of the FBI’s controversial domestic intelligence program.
I’d also say the same about DJT, that he repented and grew out of that behavior, so we’re in agreement there. But while he may have repented, that still doesn’t change that he did it. And quite frankly, I’d also say that MLK also raised his extended family very well if Aleida Scott King is of any indication.
MLK’s still a better man than Slick Willie by any stretch. Of course, even JFK, himself a reprobate by any standard, was still a better man than Slick Willie ever was. At least JFK didn’t sell missile technology to the Soviets for Campaign Cash and firmly against communism, while Clinton if anything was so for Communism he helmed anti-American protests supporting the Vietcong during the heyday of Vietnam.
You are aware that King is personal friends with Richard Nixon, right? As in, the same Richard Nixon who successfully busted Alger Hiss during the McCarthy hearings, right? That alone would make his being a Commie-anything, let alone a commie republican, extremely unlikely.
And besides, if he were a communist, please explain why he explicitly stated Communism and Christianity can never go together and implicitly condemned Communism in this essay here: http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/can-a-christian-be-a-communist/
So now we believe the FBI, but when it goes back about trump we do not, I do wonder which is it?
It's called intellectual curiosity and a quest for historical accuracy, both of which are lost on you.
Does this mean that MLK Blvd will be removed from all the street signs across America and be renamed?
Oh, well, gee golly...I thought not. /s
Should happen, shouldn't it?
Lost on me! Wow aren’t you the self righteous one. No it is not intellectual curiosity or historical accuracy. You are just a fake intellectual.
Again you have not answered the question. How are you going to use this information?
You have nothing to gain and this isn’t going to help anyone except to stoke the fires of hate.
Honestly, you heard of rape? Of MLK laughing and present at a rape? At least that must be news to you.
Stoke the fires of hate??
LOL!!!
It's racial deniers like you who mocked Ralph Abernathy when he made similar rapist claims about your hero as these FBI tapes do. Are you familiar with Rev Abernathy? I didn't think so.
Nope. But I actually do know someone who was a close friend of Reverend King.
What do you mean “Race Denier”? What does that make you? A race enforcer?
Now answer the question. What are you Jon Peterson going to do with this information?
This is a first step for the left to be able to contend that this country was “never great” and that American bedrock principles and heroes are entitled to no respect.
Their argument goes like this: All of the fundamental ideals that we think “define” America, such as freedom of speech, religion, RTKBA, freedom from unreasonable searches, judging by content of character not by race, were created by terrible and flawed people. Thomas Jefferson owned slaves! What kind or moral beacon is he?
We are more socially enlightened these days, and we must use current standards, such as those enunciated by MSNBC and the New York Times, to re-evaluate the past. People from the past who did things that we find to be unacceptable today were BAD people. BAD, BAD, BAD! Their moral precepts are tainted by and nay even actually derive from their moral failings [CNN contributors will explain exactly how the historical error or slavery caused the authors of the First Amendment to get Freedom of the Press or Freedom of Religion wrong].
For example, today's citizens should not feel any sense of revulsion at revelations that the government conducts mass spying on its citizens. There are lots of dangerous people spouting ideas whose actions are contrary to the common good, as correctly understood. They must be identified and located before they can cause more societal problems. How else can we limit the potential damage to our CITIES from posting disapproved ideas on the internet? That could “trigger” “some people” “to do something”.
The American public should not fear, and in fact should welcome, a fundamental reworking of our societal principles. As stated above (but it bears repeating frequently), they came from BAD, old, dead people, who were most certainly BAD. There should be no guilt or second thoughts uprooting and trashing their ideas. After all, they had no idea of the critical issues of today, as identified by the last 24 hour news cycle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.