Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prince Charles Snubs President Trump—But Visits Cuba and Proudly Poses with Che Guevara Backdrop
Townhall.com ^ | March 30, 2019 | Humberto Fontova

Posted on 03/30/2019 5:02:06 AM PDT by Kaslin

“Royal family snub President Trump during UK visit: Prince Charles and Prince William were unwilling to meet Donald Trump on his visit to Britain, leaving the Queen to greet the US president alone.” (London Times, July 18, 2018.)

Well, what could be more fitting than British royals snubbing the upstart leader of an upstart former British colony—and one who was elected by “deplorables” to boot? 

On the other hand, Prince Charles and Duchess Camilla, not only rank as the first British Royals to grace Bolshevik Cuba with a visit—but this week (aping President Obama three years ago) posed for a photo in front of the image of mass-murderer and faithful Bolshevik protégé Che Guevara.

The phrase “faithful Bolshevik protégé” is not flippant. The Bolsheviks, lest we forget, sadistically murdered an entire family of Prince Charles’ royal relatives (the Romanovs) in cold-blood, including the women and children, as they screamed in terror and pleaded for mercy. 

In case Prince Charles somehow “forgot” that terrifying historical datum, perhaps a famous song by a famous subject of Prince Charles (Mick Jagger) can remind him of the famous atrocity:

 “I stuck around St. Petersburg, when I saw it was a time for a change, killed the czar and his ministers, Anastasia screamed in vain.” (Sympathy for the Devil, 1968.)

Nonetheless, according to Britain’s ambassador to Cuba Anthony Stokes, the royal visit to Bolshevik Cuba was a jolly-good show: “I think it’s been a wonderful visit and the first official royal visit to Cuba – I think that’s highly significant.”

“The solution to the world’s problems lie behind the Iron Curtain,” wrote Che Guevara who often signed his correspondence “Stalin II!” In fact, so fanatical was Prince Charles and Duchess Camilla’s photo prop’s devotion to the Bolsheviks that he even applauded the Soviet slaughter of Hungarian freedom-fighters in 1957. All through the horrifying Soviet massacre, Che dutifully parroted the Soviet script that the workers, peasants and college kids battling Russian tanks in Budapest with small arms and Molotov cocktails were all “Fascists and CIA agents!" who all deserved prompt execution.

Throughout the royal visit Duchess Camilla, a world-renown “women’s rights activist,” seemed enchanted to be photographed graciously meeting the KGB-trained apparatchiks and admiring the handiwork of a regime which ranks as the Western Hemisphere’s top jailer, torturer and murderer of (genuine) women’s rights activists. 

In fact, the regime that so enchanted Duchess Camilla jailed and tortured 35,150 Cuban women (and girls) for political crimes. This ranks as a totalitarian horror utterly unknown—not only in Cuba, under those unspeakable “right-wing dictators!” you always hear about in the Fake News Media--—but in the Western Hemisphere. Some of these Cuban ladies suffered twice as long in Castro’s Gulag as Alexander Solzhenitsyn suffered in Stalin’s.

“Chirri was just a kid,” recalled one former Cuban prisoner named Ana Lazaro Rodriguez about one of her cellmates, “Barely 18. Tiny blonde and beautiful, she should have been going to high school dances. Instead because her father had been involved in a plot against Castro, she was squatting in a dark filthy cell, wallowing in menstrual blood and excrement.”

Jailing, torturing and murdering people (particularly females) for the crime of being related to “enemies of the Revolution,” by the way, comes straight from the Bolshevik playbook. The practice was started by the Soviet Cheka and greatly expanded upon by Stalin during the Great Terror. Naturally the Castros and Che Guevara adopted the practice with their own brand of gusto.

Not that at 18 Chirri was among the youngest female victims of Prince Charles and Duchess Camilla’s gracious hosts. “Mommy—MOMMY?—HAY!—NO!”  Ana Rodriguez recalls the shrieks of pain and horror coming from a nearby torture chamber.

The victim had been a 13-year-old girl raised in a Havana Catholic orphanage founded in 1705. Castroite commissars, perfectly mimicking their Bolshevik mentors, had taken over the orphanage and began hectoring the girls on how the nuns who had been raising them were actually witches preparing to sell them into prostitution. Many of the barely pubescent girls broke a blackboard and some desks in protest against the Bolshevik insults against the only home and mothers they’d ever known.

So the Soviet-mentored Castroite police yanked the little girls from the orphanage, hauled them down to the women’s prison and threw them into the cells with common prisoners.

Can someone out there puh-leeze inform all those tourists to Cuba and all those visiting dignitaries-- from Obama to Prince Charles and Duchess Camilla-- that the building with Che the mass-murderer’s mural they love to pose with as a backdrop is the headquarters for Cuba’s KGB-founded and mentored ministry of the interior (i.e. secret police)?

“Always interrogate your prisoners at night,” Che Guevara ordered his torturers during the early days of the revolution, “a man’s resistance is always lower at night.” That today the world’s largest Che mural adorns Cuba’s Ministry of the Interior, the headquarters for Cuba’s KGB- and STASI-trained secret police strikes many of us as perfectly fitting.

The prisoners in these KGB-designed chambers of horrors considered “waterboarding” a rest period, compared to the other tortures they were put through by the gracious hosts of the perpetually smiling Prince Charles and Duchess Camilla.


TOPICS: Cuba; Culture/Society; Editorial; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: che; cuba; princecharles; royals; snub; trumpuk; usefulidiots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last
To: Kaslin

Just like his Great Uncle David


81 posted on 03/30/2019 10:11:22 AM PDT by joshua c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

Princess Anne is a strong woman.


82 posted on 03/30/2019 10:58:31 AM PDT by GuavaCheesePuff (I want to thank the Good Lord for making me a Yankee-Old Yankee Stadium (1923-2008))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

Go to Townhall.com. All of his writings can be found there


83 posted on 03/30/2019 11:27:36 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (California: knowingly give someone aids: misdemeanor. Give them a straw, go to jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Thanks Kaslin. Prince Jughead acts once again like the a-hole that he is.

84 posted on 03/30/2019 11:44:46 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Those are great pics.


85 posted on 03/30/2019 12:04:52 PM PDT by AAABEST (NY/DC/LA media/political industrial complex DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

Thx


86 posted on 03/30/2019 12:07:19 PM PDT by goodnesswins (White Privilege EQUALS Self Control & working 50-80 hrs/wk for 40 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: allendale

>>the British people would have abolished the monarchy.
********************************************************
I’m thinking about this. Many people think the monarchy is just ceremonial. But the Queen actually has a lot of power. It just goes under the radar to most of their subjects who don’t really pay too much attention.

All their government forces, judiciary, legislative, military, etc., have to swear their loyalties FIRST to the Queen AND her heirs. There is no justice system for their subjects, the laws are written and the verdicts are rendered with the approval and for the benefit of the Crown. People think they are citizens, when in reality, they are subjects. Talk about a huge hoax perpetrated upon the British people....

If the People wanted to disband the monarchy, how would they go about doing it? A referendum would have to have the approval of the government, which I can’t imagine them ever doing, since they all swore oaths to the Crown.

Yes, they did “flub up” and held a referendum on leaving the EU, (They never thought they would lose, lol), and we have observed them wriggling out of that for the past two years.

Years ago, when once asked which system of government she supported, socialism, communism, etc., the Queen responded that she was part of an oligarchy, which was above government systems.

I suspect if their Subjects really wanted to end the Monarchy, just as they want to leave the EU, they would have to do it by force.


87 posted on 03/30/2019 12:19:23 PM PDT by Kalamata (Pt 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXF4ySJ7Xyc&list=PLrCQerz2L0If_VT4tw73RjhG5tBjdZfZy&index)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: HighSierra5

Some have been quite good actually but any man trade Diana Spenser for Camilla Bowles is daft and blind


88 posted on 03/30/2019 12:29:37 PM PDT by wardaddy (If we donÂ’t get some high ranking convictions from this failed coup....then they still won)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lucky2

So true. And now they have to support Harry’s new wife.
The people have named them: “Cringe & Ginge”.


89 posted on 03/30/2019 12:33:50 PM PDT by Kalamata (Pt 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXF4ySJ7Xyc&list=PLrCQerz2L0If_VT4tw73RjhG5tBjdZfZy&index)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

I saw a good documentary about her on Netflix last year
..Diana in Her Own Words. He was a prick to her from the get go.


90 posted on 03/31/2019 6:21:20 AM PDT by beaversmom (Trump is a bionic, 1-man band. Time for all Repubs to jump on his band-wagon & circle the wagons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

I got to know the azzhole pretty good while stationed there in the early 70’s....I knew from the start with Diana it was doomed...


91 posted on 03/31/2019 6:39:16 AM PDT by Doogle (( USAF.68-73....8th TFW Ubon Thailand....never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

Poor young woman. Understandably naive like so many of us have been at that age. She was smitten. And he had disdain for her because of it. He thought he was so much better than her. She would have been better off had her older sister taken to him. She was picked out by the royal establishment for her genes, virginity, and to be a brood mare. Now they’ve gone the other extreme and have Meghan Markle as part of the royal clan. They are all screwed up.


92 posted on 03/31/2019 10:44:22 AM PDT by beaversmom (Trump is a bionic, 1-man band. Time for all Repubs to jump on his band-wagon & circle the wagons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Gritty

I wish I could find a copy of that picture with the “Dou” superimposed on the upper-left.


93 posted on 03/31/2019 7:02:11 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: magua

What was that?


94 posted on 04/01/2019 10:07:15 AM PDT by Impy (I have no virtue to signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: grania; AuH2ORepublican; BillyBoy; UKrepublican; OpusatFR; mewzilla; HighSierra5; ...

I get why peeps in the UK like the Queen, but Chuckie is a joke, and who knows about the next generation.

My plan for the UK, “soft Republicanism”, dethrone the Windors and replace them with a “Regent”, lets say a non-political person chosen by the Commons (pointless Lords go bye bye) for a term of 10 years or so.

Gets rids of the hereditary monarchy without having to change the constitutional structure or name of the country. The Regent would function much as the Governors-General of the former colonies do.


95 posted on 04/01/2019 10:22:24 AM PDT by Impy (I have no virtue to signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Look at England and the mess being escaping from the EU. Can you imagine them choosing n new regent every ten years?? One can’t help but suspect Great Britain is permanently not so great anymore. Their accomplishments in the arts and sciences in the Victorian Era have no equal. Unfortunately, the Empire it created and its inbred aristocracy are its undoing.


96 posted on 04/01/2019 12:01:41 PM PDT by grania ("We're all just pawns in their game")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

Old wrinkles probably never criticised him for his rectal dalliances. It was just pragmatic.


97 posted on 04/01/2019 12:08:03 PM PDT by VietVet876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Pathetic—absolutely pathetic—and an implicit betrayal of all Magna Carta stood for, philosophically!


98 posted on 04/01/2019 12:10:10 PM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy; LS; NFHale; GOPsterinMA; BillyBoy

Used to be that a monarch would have to defend their throne, especially when they became lazy and corrupt. We need a figure, someone actually willing to stand up to the Windsors while they stand by as England falls to the Mohammadan and alien anti-Christ hordes.


99 posted on 04/01/2019 3:56:25 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj ("It's Slappin' Time !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Impy
Eh, forget "soft Republicanism", I don't see the point of replacing a useless, taxpayer funded, ceremonial Queen with a useless, useless, taxpayer funded, ceremonial "Regent". And given the current political climate of the UK, those goofballs in the House of Commons would probably elect an openly gay man or a Muslim as "Regent" so he can represent how "forward thinking' their country is to the rest of Europe and get the mainstream media to gush over it. The UK has some kind of weird fetish for doing that sort of thing, and you can't fix stupid.

I'd say abolish the monarchy outright and have a full Republic like they had in the 1600s after they beheaded Charles I, minus the whole "Lord Protector" Cromwell type figure. Most European countries have successfully switched from kingdom to republic. The exception is France, we could reverse the situation there and crown the Duke of Anjou as King Louis XX ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Alphonse,_Duke_of_Anjou ) it would be worth it if it meant getting rid of the awful French Presidents forever.

100 posted on 04/01/2019 5:06:52 PM PDT by BillyBoy (States rights is NOT a suicide pact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson