Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Impy
Eh, forget "soft Republicanism", I don't see the point of replacing a useless, taxpayer funded, ceremonial Queen with a useless, useless, taxpayer funded, ceremonial "Regent". And given the current political climate of the UK, those goofballs in the House of Commons would probably elect an openly gay man or a Muslim as "Regent" so he can represent how "forward thinking' their country is to the rest of Europe and get the mainstream media to gush over it. The UK has some kind of weird fetish for doing that sort of thing, and you can't fix stupid.

I'd say abolish the monarchy outright and have a full Republic like they had in the 1600s after they beheaded Charles I, minus the whole "Lord Protector" Cromwell type figure. Most European countries have successfully switched from kingdom to republic. The exception is France, we could reverse the situation there and crown the Duke of Anjou as King Louis XX ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Alphonse,_Duke_of_Anjou ) it would be worth it if it meant getting rid of the awful French Presidents forever.

100 posted on 04/01/2019 5:06:52 PM PDT by BillyBoy (States rights is NOT a suicide pact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: BillyBoy; grania; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj

There needs to be a head of state. The Regent would be no different that the Presidents of Ireland, Germany, or Italy.

My plan would call for only a modest budget and small honorarium.

Avoids having to change the structure of the government, a divisive debate on republicanism (that unlike Australia, almost no one on the right over there supports, so it would never be on the table unless the government was hard-left), and millions in administrative costs in changing the name of the country.

Franco technically restored the Spanish Monarchy and made himself regent for life.

Crowmell was King (and was even followed by his son! Though he refused the crown ala Caesar) but in name so I’d dispute they were ever “really” a republic.

Re Grania’s point, I don’t see why, given the nature of the position, there would be a problem getting someone approved. Canada and OZ don’t see to have any trouble picking Governors-General. If need be ditch my supermaj requirement.

The alternative would be what, have the PM directly elected by the Commons and having them be Head of State ala the President of South Africa?


110 posted on 04/02/2019 6:53:05 AM PDT by Impy (I have no virtue to signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson