Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Murkowski says she opposes Kavanaugh's nomination, but will vote 'present'
The Hill ^ | 10/05/18 | JORDAIN CARNEY

Posted on 10/05/2018 5:38:59 PM PDT by yesthatjallen

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) said Friday evening that she opposed Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination, becoming the only Republican senator to come out against President Trump's nominee.

"I will be a no tomorrow," Murkowski said in a speech on the Senate floor after describing how she had come to lean against voting to confirm Trump's second nominee to the high court in a final vote on Saturday.

But Murkowski said that in the final tally she would ask that her vote be recorded as "present," saying she was doing it as a courtesy to Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.), who is slated to attend his daughter's wedding back home on Saturday.

"I do this because a friend, a colleague of ours is in Montana this evening and ... he's going to be walking his daughter down the aisle and he won't be present to vote," Murkowski said. "I have extended this as a courtesy to my friend. It will not change the outcome of the vote."

Murkowski, who voted against ending debate on Kavanaugh earlier in the day Friday, said during her speech on the Senate floor that she "was leaning toward supporting Judge Kavanaugh in his nomination."

"But we know that in our role of advice and consent, it is not just the record itself. There is more that is attached to it," she added, mentioning "matters of temperament" and "demeanor."

Murkowski announced her decision hours after it became clear that Kavanaugh had enough votes to be confirmed.

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) announced during her own speech on the Senate floor earlier Friday that she would back his nomination ahead of a final vote set for Saturday afternoon.

Collins's support gave Republicans the necessary 50 votes to allow Vice President Pence to cast a tie-breaking vote if necessary. Collins was soon joined by Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), who said he would vote for Kavanaugh, giving him the support of 51 senators.

Murkowski said Friday night that she agreed with many of Collins's comments defending Kavanaugh, saying she didn't think he would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade or represented a threat to protections for people with preexisting conditions.

But she indicated that her confidence in his nomination was not high enough to bring herself to voting for him, given controversy swirling around allegations of sexual assault leveled against the nominee.

The Alaska senator acknowledged that it appeared that Kavanaugh would be seated on the Supreme Court "without my vote."

Murkowski pointed to Kavanaugh's combative testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week, saying "that appearance of impropriety has become unavoidable."

She called the bitter nomination process for Kavanaugh "horrible" and "gut-wrenching," saying it had left "good people ... needlessly hurt."


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: brettkavanaugh; daines; kavanaug; kavanaugh; lisamurkowski; murkowski; murky; murlowski; palin; pos; repealthe19th; scotus; senate; slimypieceofcrud; stevedaines; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 301-309 next last
To: rhinohunter

Then Mitch could hold the vote open, bring Daines back and have Pence break the tie.
But it’s not likely Murk will change. She made a deal and has to keep her end to collect.

The idea is to elect Kav by two votes so he won’t be the firat Justice approved by just one vote since 1881!
The media would love to run that story.


81 posted on 10/05/2018 6:16:27 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: edie1960

That f’n Daines better be there—I don’t trust any one of the f-tards!!


82 posted on 10/05/2018 6:16:54 PM PDT by bantam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

83 posted on 10/05/2018 6:16:54 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pride in the USA

Senator McConnell needs to remove her as the Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman asap. It’s the right thing to do.


84 posted on 10/05/2018 6:17:22 PM PDT by lonevoice (diagonally parked in a parallel universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Real courageous of you, Senator Switzerland. [/sarc]


85 posted on 10/05/2018 6:17:56 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker24; All

If I understand it correctly, it is intended to be a courtesy to Daines to let Daines stay longer at his daughter’s wedding. The margin of winning will remain the same (one vote). It would be something like 50 to 48 instead of 51 to 49.

I think the winning margin could still grow between now and the approval vote since everyone is now committed and senators still have time to switch sides so long as the approval outcome is not changed. I don’t think Daines coming back and voting once Murkowski votes present would be a good idea since it would to some degree decrease institutional trust in McConnell along with any Republican successor. However Murkowski’s reasoning seems weak enough that it seems to me conceivable that her mindset could be swayed in the direction of Kavanaugh in the final vote. This could be some kind of low grade kabuki. Another way Murkowski could be swayed is if Trump intervened with a carrot or a stick. If so someone ought to make sure Murkowski understands what is going on since she seems as dumb as a rock.

As far as Feinstein strongarming her, my own thinking of the publicized photos of their discussion should not be over-analyzed. In some videos Feinstein seems to sway from one side to another. This makes me wonder if Feinstein has a problem with her legs— specifically her hips. Anyone know more details of her physical condition? I did not watch the entire bombast body language video but imho the possibility of an ambulatory-related physical ailment should be taken into consideration when trying to analyze Feinstein’s body language. Hip arthritis, knee problems, plantar fascitis, etc.


86 posted on 10/05/2018 6:18:06 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Yes I know. I live 13 miles from Maine.

It cracks me up when people here demand she be replaced by a “real conservative”. If she gets replaced, it will be by a communist.


87 posted on 10/05/2018 6:19:06 PM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ETCS

That picture of ChiDiFi dressing down a cowering Murk is a career ender.


88 posted on 10/05/2018 6:19:22 PM PDT by JusPasenThru (Progressives need to get over their love affair with abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
Every single senator who votes no should be pillard with the question: Why have you done nothing for these things you let SCOTUS legislate? Why aren't you doing your job as a legislator and putting forward these things?

If you're worried about Kavanaugh voting against something you hold dear and overturning legislation from SCOTUS, do what your job is and put in the enabling legislation or amendments.

89 posted on 10/05/2018 6:19:23 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I know your works. You are neither cold with apathy nor hot with passion. It would be better if you were one or the other, but you are neither. So because you are lukewarm, neither cold nor hot, I will vomit you out of My mouth.
— Rev. 3:15-16


90 posted on 10/05/2018 6:20:10 PM PDT by HKMk23 (You ask how to fight an idea? Well, I'll tell you how: with another idea!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

this !!!!!!!!!!! remove her from any committee!


91 posted on 10/05/2018 6:20:29 PM PDT by bantam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Professional
Dudette. Took the place of Father.

Are you sure you're a professional, and if so, a professional what? The poster was referring to Daines as evidenced by the comment....

The dude gets paid to do one thing: vote.

And he's out when needed the most.

If it were Murkowski that the poster was referring to, why say that he/she would be out during the vote when it's clear that Murkowski will vote present.

The article mentions Murkowski's rationale for voting present, hence the comment by the poster you felt needed correcting.

92 posted on 10/05/2018 6:20:58 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

“collect” what?


93 posted on 10/05/2018 6:21:32 PM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Litmus test on how people will vote on a specific issue is an horrible way to perform this constitutional role


94 posted on 10/05/2018 6:22:36 PM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HKMk23

Well put.


95 posted on 10/05/2018 6:23:37 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Yes, and you watch John’s Testicles will now run ads saying “see, this is what you get when you vote for a Republican.” Daines should be ashamed! Mandatory weekend work is part of the job description.


96 posted on 10/05/2018 6:26:59 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: glennaro
Whatever she was promised. A bridge to sowhere maybe.

Also, Murk "pairing" her vote assures that there will be a Quorum. 51 Senators.

Paul Kane‏Verified account @pkcapitol
“When less than a quorum votes, but the addition of names of Senators present and paired and announcing votes made a quorum, the vote is valid.” Riddick’s Senate Procedure, p. 1431."

Otherwise the Dems and Murk could walk out and there wouldn't be a quorum to vote. (Unless my math is off.)

97 posted on 10/05/2018 6:27:06 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.), who is slated to attend his daughter's wedding back home on Saturday".

The man won't vote on possibly the most important vote of his lifetime because of his daughter's wedding. ARE YOU KIDDING ME ?!?!

Sen. Steve Daines - charter a private jet to get you to and from DC - or better yet - change your daughter's wedding date. Your daughter can get married on any day. Move the wedding date. There are bigger fish to fry here brother !!! The Kavanaugh vote is SATURDAY! Do what you were elected to do man!

98 posted on 10/05/2018 6:27:15 PM PDT by JesusIsLord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
No, No, No... The Dems will throw procedural roadblocks as they have done throughout these hearings. Don't give her the chance to recoverveven a minuscule thread of decency.

Murkowski made her choice, let her stand by herself and take the slings and arrows from public. She's corrupt, shameless, power hungry, and a fool.

The GOP should shun her and after the mid-terms, strip her of her unearned seniority and committee posts, and move her office into the hallway. And if the merest taint of collusion with Feinstein touches her, publish for the world to see.

99 posted on 10/05/2018 6:27:30 PM PDT by Covenantor (Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern. " Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

FOFL!!


100 posted on 10/05/2018 6:28:24 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Don't be afraid to see what you see. -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 301-309 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson