Posted on 09/29/2018 12:54:47 PM PDT by Drew68
1. I don't know Christine Blasey-Ford, but I do know what Democrat political operations look like when I see them.
2. I also know what Democrat "handlers" do when they are working their political instructions. In this case the visible handlers are: Debra Katz and Michael Bromwich.
3. The reason Ms. Ford's airline travel was an issue, was because Katz and Bromwich constructed that *false narrative* as a delay tactic.
4. Likely the socially awkward Ms. Ford was a useful tool by Katz Inc. on behalf of the Democrats and their media allies. This is how they roll.
5. Hence Ms. Ford has no idea who is the financier behind the entire operation; and all of her subsequent expenses. The script was written around her, with an intended purpose. Likely the first narrative was reliant on never actually appearing before congress.
6. The airport hotel lie-detector narrative, part of the constructed evidence through Katz inc. A familiar testing resource, only two questions, a carefully written script to follow etc. Purchased via legal counsel (Katz Inc.)
7. As the loose narrative became more evident it was going to end with a congressional appearance, Katz needed more specific support from a Capitol Hill legal insider. Enter Bromwich's contracted assistance.
8. Loose origination details lead to conflicts. During narrative engineering the most important part of creating falsehood is to avoid specificity.
9. Specific claims can be hazards because if they are refuted, the gig is up. So everything needs to be vague, ambiguous and easier to shape.
10. The narrative engineers cannot specify the *house* where the event took place, because that would lead to specific ownership trouble. If the owner of the residence refutes the false claim, the lie cannot advance. Hence, the "where" must be generally ambiguous.
11. The "when" can also be a problem. It would suck to give a specific "WHEN" only to find out the accused wasn't in town, or was elsewhere. Hence any specific "when" must be avoided to retain the false assertion.
12. As noted, the "who" in this narrative *had to* be a part of the story. But as with this story under scrutiny those four "who's" actually refuted the accusation and aligned with the accused. Thus the problem with specific "who's".
13. The use of a validating "counselor" or "therapist" is a common part of a false narrative. The reason is HIPPA protection. Regardless of what the accuser claims, the Dr. is bound to silence unless released.
14. Now we see more of the origination details falling apart
15. Keep pulling these threads, and there's likely to be many more aspects of the false narrative that will fall apart. [fear of flying, document origination and process issues]
16. One can easily imagine a person being exploited, who was promised their need to testify would likely be negligible, beginning to freak out as it appeared testimony was going to be required. Imagine the stress.
17. Which would explain the emails to the committee backing out.... trying to find an exit.... not realizing it was going to go THIS FAR. I would doubt strongly the "hacked work email" is even remotely accurate. Occam's Razor = Panic.
18. Under questioning, the Ms. Ford doesn't even know the committee volunteered to go to her, because the *handlers* (Katz Inc, then Bromwich) controlled everything. She was originally clueless to the airline travel excuse which needed to be constructed rapidly.
19. The handlers can't change history, the frequency of Ms. Ford's airline travel negated the original excuse; and needed to be shaped. Thus she needed to support the excuse in testimony, yet historic reality refutes it.
20. This is how modern Democrats roll. Fabrication and the false framework of accusation is their skillset. The lie only needs to hold up long enough to get them to the objective. [ex. Romney's taxes and Harry Reid]
21. The end justifies the means; any means. Nothing is out of bounds. This is how the modern political left operate now. Leaks, lies and intentional falsehoods. This is what Lindsey Graham was angry about during the Kavanaugh hearing.
They don't care.
/END
I enjoyed reading it and I know a lot of FReepers don't go to Twitter so I thought I'd post it here.
I did not write it. I did correct a couple of minor typos.
If this is a background investigation and Ford indicates a relationship with the subject, the FBI must interview Chistine Ford. They must repro the truthfulness of her claims. At least that is how every other BI is done.
So why didn’t our side say they were going after her for a fraudulent statement regarding flying? She clearly lied. I remember her saying it’s not much of a trauma when it’s for a vacation.
I do remember one of our senators saying wow, we would have flown out there not knowing that Ms Ford was on the east coast.
That was it. No other mention. If one lies about one thing, everything else is a lie. Someone should have mentioned that regarding the flying statement.
I concur. This is a political op, and criminal conspiracy to defame, top to bottom.
Yeah, they’re like that aren’t they? They’ll also have you gunned down in the street like a dog. Just ask Seth Rich... Oh, that’s right, we can’t.
I just read that tweet. Everyone should go to that link and read this guy’s Twitter account...some good information.
I hope the FBI does interview her, but only if isn’t a leftist.
I hate the word falsehood..lie lie lie...
“If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed”
“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it”
translations from:
http://www.searchquotes.com/Adolf_Hitler/Lies/quotes/#ixzz5SWVXEGNs
Christine Ford is clearly an emotionally unstable and fragile woman who is being manipulated by her skilled Democratic operative handlers. Something happened in her life and now she is being taken advantage by liberal activists who do not have her best interests at heart.
I think our side correctly deduced that bringing that hammer down on her would not play out very well. We'd look bad. And it worked. It gave Judge Kavanaugh the opportunity to paint her as a victim of this circus as much as he is and ultimately allowed him to seize the narrative.
How could any rational, sane person believe otherwise?
“the socially awkward Ms. Ford was a useful tool”
Sorry, Sundance, not buying this at all.
IMO she is a conniving liar who conceived the entire idea of the phony hit on Kavanaugh and has carefully practiced putting forth a false presentation of herself as a child-like ingenue in order to make the hit more effective.
Her baby talk manner is how she has manipulated people all her life. No one should be fooled by it.
I want to see Fords college records. No way does a dingbat like this have degrees. If she does then our universities are worse off than I thought. This woman doesn’t know if she’s coming or going. Either that or she’s on drugs, I suspect heroin judging by the extreme vocal fry in her voice which is a big give away.
For example here’s a heroin addict talking....
https://youtu.be/Hgvzm9hm5DU?t=135
Sound familiar?
I want to see Fords college records. No way does a dingbat like this have degrees. If she does then our universities are worse off than I thought. This woman doesn’t know if she’s coming or going. Either that or she’s on drugs, I suspect heroin judging by the extreme vocal fry in her voice which is a big give away.
For example here’s a heroin addict talking....
https://youtu.be/Hgvzm9hm5DU?t=135
Sound familiar?
The little girl act seems so unbelievable.
This is an accomplished professional woman, with multiple degrees including a PhD. Her entire demeanor is really odd.
Not sure why anyone would’nt follow certain Twitter feeds in this day and age.
ford is a big fat liar and I can say I despise her.....
If the FBI interviews her, she is required to tell the
truth or face significant penalty. This will get
interesting.
Collusion. Corruption. That is the lefts playbook. Fusion GPS is one of their operatives. There are others who “compose” opposition research for democrats.
Grassley should Subpoena Sen. Feinstein and her staff for ALL communications regarding Ms Ford and judge Kav’s confirmation.
I’ve known women who were attacked and worse. To hear them tell their account of their horror, your heart would break. Biggest part of their trauma is that they do remember every detail, but wish they could forget.
To me Ford’s testimony had all of the sincerity and emotion of a politician reading a phone book out loud during a filibusterer. She was well coached. I think some of her prep had to be watching tapes of Anita Hill. They practiced her so much that even she bought the BS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.