Posted on 09/22/2018 9:40:56 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
1) More big breaking news, which further undercuts the Ford accusation, as well as media handling of it. A source has given me the email that WaPo reporter Emma Brown sent to Mark Judge, one person Ford claims was at the party. This email is dated Sunday, Sept. 16, 2018....
7) So first, huge problem: This was just a week ago, and we have Ford giving two different accounts of who was present. Four boys. No, three boys, one girl. Either way, therapist notes from 2012 definitively say four boys, which Ford didn't dispute. But now... a girl!
8) Other problem: WaPo's reporting. Reporter has for a week had the names of those Ford listed as present. One is a woman. Yet it writes a story saying FOUR BOYS. Why? Maybe a mistake. But if so, why did WaPo never correct that narrative?
(Excerpt) Read more at threadreaderapp.com ...
Because he's a man and doesn't have the 'emotional intelligence' needed to decode the sophisticated female nuances written between the lines in the parts of the letter which otherwise might seem hysterical or contradictory.
I kid you not, I read this as ...
I hope Ford knows there will be a server waiting for her with notification of a big fat pantsuit.
Read it 3 times to understand what I actually read.
He needs to sue her and get a judgement and an apology otherwise the commies will tag him as a rapist for the rest of his life.
Because of this, what other sane, rational human being will ever accept a nomination for the SC from Trump.
How do we know that the letter was from the THERAPIST???
You're missing a few marbles if you think any of this matters to any US Senator who will be voting on the nomination.
Wrong. Every single one of them know she's lying.
But they do think that women who vote and who are Democrats, 85% of whom get all of their news from Facebook, will find her credible because they watch Law and Order SVU.
THAT'S all that counts.
Do you think they though Judge Kavanaugh would just step down?
It’s completely believable. Leftards often leave friends in dire straits. Ask Mary Jo Kopechne.
You and I might know they are of their father, the Devil, but many don’t. Asking questions like this is an effective way of exposing them. Calling them out directly closes up people. Shouldn’t, but it does.
That ship has already sailed.
The only way you'll ever expunge that belief from the "minds" of the Left is with a trench and a bulldozer.
If you don't believe me, go look on Twitter.
Some Lefty tweeted that we need to hear testimony under oath from Ford, Kavanaugh and Mark Judge.
I pointed out that Leland Keyser, who Ford said was at the party, had not witnessed Kavanaugh at a 5-person party, and had never in fact met Brett Kavanaugh.
The Lefty tweeted back that we need to get Ford, Kavanaugh and Mark Judge under oath.
I don't think he was kidding, and he appears to be just a medium Democrat partisan, not an insane Resister.
This is serious brain damage stuff. The News Misleadia has caused actual serious incurable brain damage in these people.
Sorry, was going to add more as that sounds like I’m lecturing you. I was going to add...
But I’m sure you know that. I think you were just making a point against WashPo and I do the same. So I’m not jabbing at you, just adding to the conversation. You and I correctly loathe these vile scum.
The last count seems to be 3 in the upstairs bedroom and a guy and a girl downstairs.
$8.4 million in that case, and the colonel's accuser didn't have as deep pockets as the Washington Post (Bezos' pockets).
(Kavanaugh's hiring of an attorney who specializes in defamation lawsuits made sense before. It makes even more sense now.)
I would assume the reason story was not corrected was it helps make her look more like a “victim” being against 4 boys.......
Credit for News Misleadia goes to another Freeper.😵
“It’s the seriousness of the charge”
Which is precisely what Feinstein was counting on, just the charge itself. I do not think she or anyone was wanting this to go this far, don’t even think she wanted Fords name to come out. Then when the initial information came out, Feinstein looked ridiculous, and obvious, so much so that she had to make a statement “I don’t know if she is telling the truth”. Much of this is the result of saving Diane Feinstein.
I am team Strassel and have been for years. I subscribe to the Wall Street Journal mainly to have easy access to her Friday column. She is the best.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.