Posted on 06/04/2018 7:17:18 AM PDT by CFW
"Whatever the confluence of speech and free exercise principles might be in some cases, the Colorado Civil Rights Commission's consideration of this case was inconsistent with the State's obligation of religious neutrality. The reason and motive for the baker's refusal were based on his sincere religious beliefs and convictions."
link to decision
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-111_j4el.pdf
You’re probably thinking of Sweet Cakes in Oregon. This opinion will bolster their case immensely.
This is great news, sad that it took five years.
Kagan???
...
Kagan isn’t as bad as the other two. She’s the third worst on the court.
Cue the mods via the "Abuse" key and they may move it. By doing so you are not abusing the "Abuse" key when a decision of such importance needs greater distribution.
It’s a pretty narrow decision based in large part on a perceived bias in the Colorado commission towards Phillps’ religious beliefs and the fact that gay marriage was illegal in Colorado at the time the cake was ordered. It’d be nice to think that this is the end of things but I expect that this is only the first time this gets taken to the Supreme Court and not the last.
Yeah, but it is a heck of a lot better than being ruled the other way by 7-2. We take what wins we can get.
Kudos to Kagan
Kennedy did everything that he could to make this as pro-sodomite as possible without ruling for the sodomites, such much so, that even the lesbo Kagan and demented Breyer joined the opinion. The Obama judges on the various Court of Appeals will twist this as a pro-sodomite ruling. Kennedy HAS got to go. I firmly believe that this would have been a home-run victory for people of faith if he weren’t on the court.
BTW, Anyone who was worried about Gorsuch on homosexual issues needs to read Thomas’ concurring opinion that GORSUCH joined. Gorsuch rightly sees that the narrow holding of the Court here ignored the Free Speech and Association aspects of this case. Gorsuch and Thomas clearly would hold for people of faith. I am certain that Alito would too. We need Kennedy to go and Trump to appoint another Gorsuch before we have a court that actually respects people of faith.
Good. Maybe they’ll do the opposite to muzzie cab drivers who refuse seeing eye dogs or someone with groceries that have alcohol in the bag or whatever stupid reason they use to deny service.
You can’t make this up. USA story headline:
“Supreme Court rules narrowly for baker who refused to create same-sex couple’s wedding cake”
NARROWLY? 7-2 is NARROWLY?????
Dang, fake news is getting pretty brazen in their lies.
I remember folks touting well at least Sottomayor is Catholic ....so much for that optimism
Ginsburg has always been a lost cause
Yes. But just think how ticked off the left is going to be on seeing the the headlines that it has been reversed. Their heads are going to explode!
With Kennedy as the swing vote, the conservative justices probably decided that a broad religious-liberty decision would not get the needed support.
Proof the old bitch needs to just die off so we can get someone that can read into the position.
Kagan in the majority?
God bless her . . . shocking
LOL, roflmao,
u r very creative
Suppose got a wedding invitation to a "gay" wedding.....and responded...."I will not attend your so called wedding because I do not believe it's what God had in mind."
Can they sue me?? Of course not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.