Posted on 05/17/2018 10:55:26 AM PDT by Para-Ord.45
BREAKING NEWS.
Inspector General Horowitz found “reasonable grounds” for believing there has been a violation of federal criminal law in the FBI’s handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation. Horowitz has referred his findings of potential criminal misconduct to Huber for possible criminal prosecution, says investigative reporter, Paul Sperry. Buckle up because IG Horowitz’s report is going to light DC up.
Investigative reporter, Paul Sperry dropped this gem Thursday afternoon:
Sperry tweeted: BREAKING: IG Horowitz has found “reasonable grounds” for believing there has been a violation of federal criminal law in the FBI/DOJ’s handling of the Clinton investigation/s and has referred his findings of potential criminal misconduct to Huber for possible criminal prosecution.
Sperry also dropped this:
BREAKING: Comey/Yates targeted Gen. Flynn in C.I. investigation a yr BEFORE he communicated w Russian ambassador in Dec 2016 as a transition official–and the trigger was Flynn sitting at same table w Putin at Dec 2015 Moscow event, even tho Green Party’s Jill Stein also at table
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Do this. Have a Moderator contact me and explain that the site rules do not apply to you, alittleelboegrease. Have the Moderator explain that you have received a special dispensation to stalk me from thread to thread for weeks on end, pathologically pursuing your unprovoked personal vendetta. Particularly have the Moderator explain that you have been given the green light to go all personal attacks all the time. Perhaps the justification will be that you are just a Very Special Person, and the rules that apply to everyone else don’t apply to you.
I gotta go clean the pool soon and do some laps. You keep doing laps here.
See post 341.
_______________
You see, FW.
You continually call people rude, ignorant, immature,creepy, etc., etc., etc.
Save your venom for the liberals that you say you were before you heard Rush.
If I may add, you waste too much of your energy against the wrong people.
********
Stalkers gonna stalk.
I hear the gallows march is pretty rough on a mans soul. I'd like to see that theory tested in a real world environment.
Since General Flynn was promptly indicted for making a false statement,
It is not illogical to question why McCabe has not been promptly
indicted for making 3 false statements under oath.
Especially since McCabe should be held to a higher standard
as a law enforcement agent.
What is illogical is why McCabe has not been indicted yet.
Lying under oath is not a complex case. Indict him and let a
jury decide his fate.
They all know if the truth comes out the country would fall, the economy is a shell game world wide..a facade at best...least of evils is America, God allows us to exist to protect Israel and spread Christianity..when we turn from that we will fall..
His body language - indeed, the mere fact that he authorized and agreed to such a flippant quick vid - should tell any astute observer everything they wish to know. (Which is probably why it was created and posted in the first place.)
I've long said Trump holds all the cards. His problem isn't fighting for conviction(s), his challenge is a literal overabundance of targets. So, faced with wins any which way he chooses, how do you maximize the betting to claim the entire pot?
My guess is Trump has the next 6 months story boarded to the day (week at a minimum). The entire exercise is to sweep Nov 2018. As any good entertainer knows, you save the best for last. You certainly don't open big, with nothing to follow. People have short attention spans - the 'net isn't helping matters either. So, you have to work & mold the clay you're given.
By the first week of November, treason should be the common term used generally by people in everyday conversation. The American public should be sufficiently inured to the shock, and have come to the matter of fact terms and reality, thus leading to their own conclusion(s) about punishment.
Trump is pulling a massive psyops campaign on hundreds of millions of people, using existing media infrastructure to deliver the message. If he can successfully defeat the deep state and restore the republic, then the books that will be written about this guy, the science of what he was able to accomplish, will dominate academics and historians for generations.
Especially since McCabe should be held to a higher standard as a law enforcement agent.
What is illogical is why McCabe has not been indicted yet. Lying under oath is not a complex case. Indict him and let a jury decide his fate."
________________
You make good points.
However, I'm pretty sure Flynn will walk and be soon "made whole" as much as is possible. He has paid a nasty price for being a good man.
And McCabe will get what he richly deserves in due time ....... soon.
I've long said Trump holds all the cards. His problem isn't fighting for conviction(s), his challenge is a literal overabundance of targets. So, faced with wins any which way he chooses, how do you maximize the betting to claim the entire pot?
My guess is Trump has the next 6 months story boarded to the day (week at a minimum). The entire exercise is to sweep Nov 2018. As any good entertainer knows, you save the best for last. You certainly don't open big, with nothing to follow. People have short attention spans - the 'net isn't helping matters either. So, you have to work & mold the clay you're given.
By the first week of November, treason should be the common term used generally by people in everyday conversation. The American public should be sufficiently inured to the shock, and have come to the matter of fact terms and reality, thus leading to their own conclusion(s) about punishment.
Trump is pulling a massive psyops campaign on hundreds of millions of people, using existing media infrastructure to deliver the message. If he can successfully defeat the deep state and restore the republic, then the books that will be written about this guy, the science of what he was able to accomplish, will dominate academics and historians for generations.
_______________________________
BRAVO
From your post here to the history books!
-—treason should be the common term -—
In my view, you are on the right track but wrong word and charge.
The common term for discussion and talk will be “conspiracy”
Conspiracy is very broad and includes mere typing of documents written and approved by thoseconspirators at the top. Conspiracy can go down many levels in an organization to sweep up lots of folks.
Treason is a very narrow and I believe hard to prove charge.
I'm scratching my head over this one.
Flynn's indictment was dated December 1, 2017. The events described in the indictment date back to late 2016 and early 2017. I don't know how you would call this "promptly indicted" under any definition of the term.
___________
I didn't mean to mislead, but the substance of that great post was from semantic.
Perhaps a comparison between Flynn and Clapper would be more apt:
‘Via JonathanTurley.org,
Today is an important anniversary for former intelligence chief James Clapper. No it is not his marriage anniversary or conventional milestone. Clapper can celebrate the running out of the statute of limitations on his alleged perjury before Congress — five years and Clapper is now beyond the reach of the law.’
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-12/happy-perjury-anniversay-james-clapper
Your style of writing is a lot like another Freeper.
His name LS.
Are u LS hiding behind this screen name?
Sorry for the confusion.
********
Let the Dems/Liberals/Globalists/MSM/Deep State Thugs, and especially .... HILARRHEA ROTTEN VON PANTSUIT ..... vaporize into nonexistence.
Regarding McCabe.
In the original interview with McCabe, FBI agents did not believe
Flynn lied. So, even though the case goes back for some time,
he was not indicted for lying then because as we now know
FBI agents did not believe Flynn lied.
That changed. And when that changed, he was promptly
indicted for making a false statement.
A correction. I said In the original interview with McCabe.
I meant to say in the original interview with Flynn.
In my recent post to you, I said in the original interview with McCabe.
I meant to say in the original interview with Flynn.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.