I'm scratching my head over this one.
Flynn's indictment was dated December 1, 2017. The events described in the indictment date back to late 2016 and early 2017. I don't know how you would call this "promptly indicted" under any definition of the term.
Perhaps a comparison between Flynn and Clapper would be more apt:
‘Via JonathanTurley.org,
Today is an important anniversary for former intelligence chief James Clapper. No it is not his marriage anniversary or conventional milestone. Clapper can celebrate the running out of the statute of limitations on his alleged perjury before Congress — five years and Clapper is now beyond the reach of the law.’
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-12/happy-perjury-anniversay-james-clapper
Your style of writing is a lot like another Freeper.
His name LS.
Are u LS hiding behind this screen name?
Regarding McCabe.
In the original interview with McCabe, FBI agents did not believe
Flynn lied. So, even though the case goes back for some time,
he was not indicted for lying then because as we now know
FBI agents did not believe Flynn lied.
That changed. And when that changed, he was promptly
indicted for making a false statement.
In my recent post to you, I said in the original interview with McCabe.
I meant to say in the original interview with Flynn.