Q - TRUST Adm R. He played the game to remain in control.

https://qcodefag.github.io/ ^ | Q

[RoosterRedux]

This entire shutdown exercise was Schumers attempt to put Trump in his place. He failed spectacularly.

Jan 22 2018 14:16:08 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: f2d4bd 127256

>>127246

Thank you for visiting the WH. FEAR.

Q

580

Jan 22 2018 14:13:04

Q

!UW.yye1fxo ID: f2d4bd 127218

Private exchange [last].

Q

381

Jan 22 2018 14:05:49

Q

!UW.yye1fxo ID: f2d4bd

127154

:stay at home<

[-7]

DR_noon_clear_sky^

Safe comms_SAT-re_Bz985300^00

Q

Jan 21 2018

578

Jan 21 2018 22:32:11

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: fe774d

121147

Every [3] letter is here.

You are in the middle of some

thing historic. Q

577

Jan 21 2018 22:20:15

Anonymous ID: c4d817

120926

GUYS- email was sent out by NSA before election with some plausible deniability attached to it so people could say "FAKE"! HOWEVER, the main audience wasn't normies, it was the black hats, a shot across the bow to say "WE HAVE IT ALL, YOUR'E RIGGING WON'T WORK". Q just brought it back up to speak directly to "THEM" again to show they are going to dump it all.

[KittenClaws]

I came to believe that President Trump, or someone close to him was posting as Q in the same way that I decided to Support Donald Trump as President (I voted for Cruz in the primary) - an outsider beholding to no one just “rang true” to me.

Once I became aware of Q and got on the ping list, the more I read, the more it “rang true”.

There was no assurance or factual evidence that proved Donald Trump would be a great President - Yet he is. There is no assurance or solid evidence that, no matter who Q is, his posts are based on fact - but I believe they are.

Considering how half of the Country and plenty of foreign states and people have been stark raving mad since Donald Trump was elected, most of Q’s posts are more than likely true. Or else the worlds reaction to a Trump presidency makes no sense at all after a full year.

In my tag line I question myself and others.

[greeneyes]

Point well taken. I find the research that people find to be very interesting, and informative. Facts speak.

Divide and conquer - oldest strategy in the books. Time will tell.

[Fantasywriter]

I used the term cult bc those who express honest doubts and who ask reasonable questions are labeled trolls, fools, dumb, stupid, and other unsavory things. In a non-cult environment civil discussion is permitted. When ‘believers,’ go to unseemly lengths to silence and/or personally attack questioners, the rubric of cult is warranted.

[bagster]

"I am a fully reformed liberal."

Fantasywriter

[grey_whiskers]

He has quite a following on Twitter among those who have been watching Q, and turned quite suddenly against the authenticity of Q.
I thought you might be interested in his arguments.

[bagster]

FRiends, please ignore the trolls!

Sage advice, MN. At some point, it is just too much energy to argue with them. Our energy should be spent convincing the willing and getting the word out.

The trolls are not here with an open mind, seeking information, or open to being convinced. The bulk of them have their minds made up and close for business, and just seeking to virtue signal their superiority to us "koo koo birds"

And yet, it is so tempting. I am a famous troll fighter from ages past and I do so love a battle.

What to do, what to do....

[grey_whiskers]

I knew a co-worker at a former job who gave bone marrow.

Apparently you can't give it willy-nilly: the immune system of the donor must closely match that of the receiver, or the bone marrow thinks *it* is the immune system, and starts attacking the patient.

And that is part of the reason it is so expensive -- a LOT of work has to be done to make sure you can use it.

[Fantasywriter]

Ad hominem.

Par for the course.

[Fantasywriter]

I’m not in the least interested, but thanks anyway.

[bagster]

Meaningless doubletalk—exactly as predicted.

Are you Q?

[bagster]

PEOPLE ARE SICK OF YOUR STUPIDITY ? IGNORANCE ? OR ARE YOU A TROLLLLLLLL ??????/

Haha. This one made me chuckle. Not sure why.

[nanetteclaret]

***not in the least interested***

You just outed yourself as a troll.

[bagster]

If Q had made any significant predictions, etc., you wouldn’t have to write so many words to say nothing.

Well there it is there. Using geometric logic, you have disproven the existence of Q.

You may leave now after a job well done, goodman.

[bagster]

Again with the insults. It’s a counterproductive approach.

Said the raven to the crow.

[bagster]

In the words of Mr. Miyagi: Patience, grasshoppa

Master Po, actually.

Kwai Chang Bagster

North Shao Lin temple

[bagster]

Yet there is time and energy for a seemingly limitless number of content-free and fact-free posts.

Exhibit A.

[bagster]

there goal is to disrupt every time you answer them they win.

Q nation has begun to sort itself out. Some are information disseminators, the ;scholars and the researchers. Some are soldiers, and have been tasked with defending the scholar/ priests. There are rare warrior/priests who can multitask. Grey Whiskers and Jocko come to mind.

The information scholars will keep us informed, and the soldiers will keep the sidewinders, tenderfoots, and bushwackers at bay.

Thus as it has always been, and thus it shall ever be.

And as far as them winning? When they win? They still lose.

They are dealing from a crooked deck.

[Fantasywriter]

https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/Anyone-following-QAnon-on-4Chan-/5-2062886/

[bagster]

You have no idea how much research I have done.

I don't either. But check this.

I'm probably at least as smart as you. Probably as cynical as you. As patriotic, if in fact you are. And I have done probably half as much research on this as the REALLY sharp freepers here.

And yet you and I have reached the exact opposite conclusions.

All those things being equal (or thereabouts) how do you explain this? It's an honest question, goodman.

[bagster]

Just look at the way the true believers try to destroy, slander and silence the “deniers.” That alone tells you global warming is a fraud.

No, no a thousand times no. The manner in which an argument is made is no evidence of the truth or non truth of that argument. Only facts can prove a truth. Not feelings. Not emotion. Not stridency. Not a loud voice. Not a whap upside the head. None of those are evidence. Do not try to make them so.

Science