Posted on 01/22/2018 3:59:44 PM PST by RoosterRedux
This entire shutdown exercise was Schumers attempt to put Trump in his place. He failed spectacularly.
Jan 22 2018 14:16:08 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: f2d4bd 127256
>>127246
Thank you for visiting the WH. FEAR.
Q
580
Jan 22 2018 14:13:04
Q
!UW.yye1fxo ID: f2d4bd 127218
Private exchange [last].
Q
381
Jan 22 2018 14:05:49
Q
!UW.yye1fxo ID: f2d4bd
127154
:stay at home<
[-7]
DR_noon_clear_sky^
Safe comms_SAT-re_Bz985300^00
Q
Jan 21 2018
578
Jan 21 2018 22:32:11
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: fe774d
121147
Every [3] letter is here.
You are in the middle of some
thing historic. Q
577
Jan 21 2018 22:20:15
Anonymous ID: c4d817
120926
GUYS- email was sent out by NSA before election with some plausible deniability attached to it so people could say "FAKE"! HOWEVER, the main audience wasn't normies, it was the black hats, a shot across the bow to say "WE HAVE IT ALL, YOUR'E RIGGING WON'T WORK". Q just brought it back up to speak directly to "THEM" again to show they are going to dump it all.
Can you please elaborate?
Verified.
Must be a browser thing -- my screen shows your Podesta text immediately to the left of the Delaware.
I had to read it three times but yes, you are correct. Q did predict on 10/31 Podesta’s arrest for 11/3 and Huma’s for 11/6. Well done and thank you for reading the text. My confusion was with the issue that the prediction was made on 11/3, but nevertheless I admit when I am wrong.
You referred to a complexity of motivation as determinative of action. I agree. I have long believed that motivation mounts up to critical mass thereby forcing a given action. Never is an action derived from a paucity of causes. It is always necessitated absolutely by a preponderance of influences. We do what we do because we have no option to do otherwise.
Freepmail!
Thank you for that reply.
*Indictment..not arrest.
Thanks. Maybe But are we really surprised
Exactly, it all needs to be exposed so we can bury the commie left for good. I do understand why he says it could put many cases in jeopardy so who knows. He does mentions worse things to come so I guess if all this leads to cleaning up the law agencies, that’s a good start. Then there’s the horrible stuff to come, to bring them down for a long time.
CGato
Fantasywriter demands proof for the existence of God. As a believer I cannot give him that. I am only capable of witnessing to my own condition.
Q makes sense to me because it fits my reality. It does not fit his. Fine.
The fact that he is derisive of my reality, however, whether willfully or not, is insulting and worthy of my derision.
Don’t know that I would say “no” option ... but the influences can be very powerful.
That is precisely what you are doing. And, yes, I am in fact entitled to my own facts.
It was my intention to add you to post #350. My apologies.
There's really no helping fantasywriter, many have tried on these threads and they continue to be combative for some reason.
What fantasywriter fails to see, if they did any research like they claimed, is Q early on claimed that 80% of what is going on behind the scenes, we would not hear about. He has since said it is 60% or more. So those indictments could have happened on those dates and have not been made public. We do know the indictments are there. There have been some reports a few corruptocrats are wearing law enforcement ankle bracelets so it's still quite possible, these things have happened.
CGato
.
I have never demanded proof of God. Why would you post such a false claim?
I haven’t insulted anyone on this thread, or tried to get anyone banned. You are making unsubstantiated claims.
We speak entirely different languages from entirely different worlds.
That’s no answer. You outright lied about me when you said I demanded proof of God. That’s indefensible.
At the close of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, Franklin was queried as he left Independence Hall on the final day of deliberation. In the notes of Dr. James McHenry, one of Marylands delegates to the Convention, a lady asked Dr. Franklin Well Doctor what have we got, a republic or a monarchy. Franklin replied, A republic . . . if you can keep it.
Our Constitution created a limited representative republic. A republic is different from a democracy. In a democracy, the majority can directly make laws, while in a republic, elected representatives make laws. Basically, in a pure democracy, the majority has unlimited power, whereas in a republic, a written constitution limits the majority and provides safeguards for the individual and minorities.
You might find this interesting: Thomas Wictor over on Twitter has come down *hard* against Q based on tonight’s postings.
https://twitter.com/ThomasWictor/status/955661474952654848
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.