Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

To Put It Charitably, California’s Tax Idea Is Nuts
The American Spectator ^ | January 4, 2018 | Steven Greenhut

Posted on 01/04/2018 7:00:39 PM PST by Cheerio

The latest notion by the Trump Resistance: Turn state tax bill into a charitable contribution to get around Republican tax law.

Sacramento

I’ve routinely slammed California’s Democratic leaders for their plodding lack of creativity in dealing with the state’s many crises. Pick a problem (infrastructure, poverty, housing, etc.) and they have the same basic solution: Raise taxes, expand a bureaucracy, and give the government more power and money to “do something.” It would never dawn on them that the biggest problems are in the areas where they’ve intervened the most.

But it’s time to give credit where it’s due. Their latest ploy to derail the recently passed Republican tax law may be indicative of the leadership’s unhealthy obsession with the Trump administration, but it does display a remarkable level of creative policymaking. It’s bad news, but it must have taken some real thought to concoct the scheme. The idea is to rename state tax payments as “charitable contributions” to get around new limits on state tax deductions.

Spectator readers know about the many advantages of the GOP tax bill, which lowers tax rates and is likely to give the economy a boost. They also know about its disadvantages. Namely, it will increase the federal deficit given that no one — from either party — ever tries to cut federal spending. For those of us living in high-tax states, it also has the disadvantage of capping our state and local tax deduction at $10,000 rather than an unlimited amount. The average deduction was $22,000, reflective of the highly progressive nature of the state’s tax system.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: ca; california; irs; tax; taxes; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
'Essentially, they would be “donating” money to the state as a charity rather than paying their taxes to the state government. The whole switcheroo is undermined by one little thing: If you don’t make this “charitable contribution,” you will be forced to pay it anyway.'

Will the FED IRS allow this for California 2018 Individual 1040-Sched A returns? Or is this another of California nullification schemes thumbing their nose at the District of Corruption?
1 posted on 01/04/2018 7:00:39 PM PST by Cheerio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

The IRS just rules that mandatory charitable deductions are taxes, and ignore what California calls them. Should be a simple agency ruling and any court would back them.


2 posted on 01/04/2018 7:05:38 PM PST by Mr Rogers (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio; LS; SunkenCiv; Kaslin

Welllll, it seems that these CA bureaucrat-extremist-socialist-communists forgot the minor fact that NO CA government agency or city or county is a 501C4 organizations with a 501 Federal Tax permit.

No IRS permit from Washington, no charitable deduction from the IRS for 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 .....


3 posted on 01/04/2018 7:08:24 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

I can’t imagine any sane person seeing it any differently than you stated there.


4 posted on 01/04/2018 7:11:09 PM PST by DoughtyOne (McConnell, Ryan, and the whole GOPe are dead to me. Are Alabamans tired of winning?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

If you’re compelled by government to donate it’s not a “charity”.


5 posted on 01/04/2018 7:12:39 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Remember: All Cultures Are Equal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

These bastards want to add tax fraud to their many crimes. For how long can we survive with state governments based on illegality?


6 posted on 01/04/2018 7:13:23 PM PST by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Yes, I would expect they would get crushed immediately on a substance over form ruling.


7 posted on 01/04/2018 7:15:05 PM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

If it’s truly voluntary they might have an argument. Otherwise no chance.


8 posted on 01/04/2018 7:20:31 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A Cook PE

Exactly, beat me to it.

Was thinking State deduction?, but then that would make no sense giving a portion of the money back, then spending the remaining on a new tax office expansion.

But then again....it is California


9 posted on 01/04/2018 7:21:55 PM PST by DanielRedfoot (Po Dunk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

It appears to me that the IRS will just announce that the money “given” to citizens by California in trade for mandatory “charity” will merely be declared additional income same as state refunds are now.


10 posted on 01/04/2018 7:26:15 PM PST by Smedley (It's a sad day for American capitalism when a man can't fly a midget on a kite over Central Park)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

> Will the FED IRS allow this for California 2018 Individual 1040-Sched A returns?

Exactly the problem...it only qualifies for charitable deduction if the Feds grant 501(c)(3) status to the organization. Do we really expect the IRS to do so for California tax payments? Not a prayer.


11 posted on 01/04/2018 7:31:33 PM PST by XEHRpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

If California really cared about its citizens, they could lower their taxes...but they don’t care about them and only care about illegals.


12 posted on 01/04/2018 7:38:00 PM PST by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Of course their tax ideas are nuts, so are their spending ideas, that’s why they have to tax so much.


13 posted on 01/04/2018 7:39:04 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents-Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
If you’re compelled by government to donate it’s not a “charity”.

That's a pretty easy concept for those on FreeRepublic, but for others, even Supreme Court Justices, can't seem to figure it out.

14 posted on 01/04/2018 7:41:00 PM PST by libertylover (Kurt Schlicter: "They wonder why they got Trump. They are why they got Trump")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Tax fraud is an arrestable offense, and encouraging others to engage in tax fraud is also arrestable. If the politicians pass a law that designates taxes as charitable deductions, and then urge their citizens to tell the IRS that they are charitable deductions, they need to be jailed.


15 posted on 01/04/2018 7:45:54 PM PST by Enterprise (Do away with all symbols of past slavery. Start with the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Works just like obozocare penalties are not a tax.


16 posted on 01/04/2018 7:53:59 PM PST by oldasrocks (rump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Williams; SkyPilot; Mariner; Rome2000
These bastards want to add tax fraud to their many crimes.

The REAL tax fraud was perpetrated by limiting the SALT deduction which had been unchanged for 105 years.

I expect a successful SCOTUS challenge and millions being paid/refunded to defrauded taxpayers.

Now THAT will be a deficit-booster and a half.

17 posted on 01/04/2018 7:55:24 PM PST by lightman (ANTIFA is full of Bolshevik.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: XEHRpa
Exactly the problem...it only qualifies for charitable deduction if the Feds grant 501(c)(3) status to the organization. Do we really expect the IRS to do so for California tax payments? Not a prayer

The IRS has always considered non-tax or fee, pure donations/contributions to State and Local governments to be charitable contributions.

18 posted on 01/04/2018 7:57:39 PM PST by lightman (ANTIFA is full of Bolshevik.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

I’ve never heard of a ‘mandatory’ charity. Renaming taxes a charity would make them volunary.


19 posted on 01/04/2018 8:02:42 PM PST by DaxtonBrown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

The state and lenders issue tax statements at the end of the year showing property taxes paid. If they make the amount over 10,000 a charitable deduction they will be puting their fraud in writing. The property tax bills are public information and required or you lose your house.

Property taxes are impounded with many people’s house payments. So now the bank impound “charitable deductions. I think they may violate federal lending laws. This is going to be popcorn worthy.


20 posted on 01/04/2018 8:09:39 PM PST by morphing libertarian (Build Kate's Wall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson